Dante
simulacrum..facsimile..imitation..replica...copy
Name one time the republicans every asked to pack the courts? Name one time the republicans every threatened to fire an entire court for ruling against them.



Despite rhetoric, GOP has supported court packing in states like Arizona, Georgia
President Trump has seized on the issue in the final weeks of the race, arguing Joe Biden would push Congress to increase the number of Supreme Court seats.
Republican-controlled state governments have expanded supreme courts in states like Arizona, Georgia, and Utah to secure conservative majorities. While opposing federal court expansion, GOP legislators use this tactic at the state level to counteract rulings they oppose, with recent actions in 2026 focusing on securing political power. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key Examples of State-Level Court Expansion:
Context and Strategy:
- Arizona (2016): Governor Doug Ducey signed legislation expanding the state Supreme Court from five to seven seats.
- Georgia: Republican legislators expanded the state supreme court to ensure a more conservative leaning.
- Utah (2026): Lawmakers moved to expand the high court to prevent adverse rulings.
- Tennessee: Legislators redrew districts to break up Democratic power in Memphis and altered judicial structures. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
- Ideological Shift: Proponents, including researchers like Marin Levy of Duke Law School, note that Republican efforts to restructure state courts are often direct responses to unpopular rulings.
- Double Standard: While Republican lawmakers have labeled Democratic proposals to expand the U.S. Supreme Court as "dangerous" and "unprecedented", they have implemented similar, smaller-scale expansions in states where they hold total political power.
- 2026 Focus: In early 2026, these efforts continue, with critics arguing such moves undermine judicial independence to ensure partisan wins in state courts
Why some Republicans rediscovered their love of court packing
GOP officials fiercely oppose adding judicial seats to shift a court in an ideological direction — except when they don’t.