Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 27,104
- 12,746
- 973
If there's evidence they're lying, then you might have a point. Maybe you need to consider that not everyone is like you.
Do you have another solution?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If there's evidence they're lying, then you might have a point. Maybe you need to consider that not everyone is like you.
Good lord, this is so brain dead.It's true, both Reagan and Trump were very transparent admins.....unlike the Stalinist regimes of the Obama and Xiden regimes that did everything in secret.
No, I do understand, our system is based upon the presumption of innocence until proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Our system is built to let the guilty walk to protect the innocent. Are you wanting it to change for Trump?You don’t understand juries
It takes all jurors to gain a conviction
Only one to hang a jury
Any normal President, who cared about the Nation and didnt want to see the Nation even more divided, would take a plea deal, lowering their charges, with no jail time, but some other form of punishment.Republicans in Congress have already shown a willingness to ignore Trumps transgressions no matter how egregious
Is it possible to form a Jury without at least one member who is willing to accept whatever lie Trump is telling?
I think the poster I was a agreeing with is quite bright sometimes.Good lord, this is so brain dead.
a plea deal on what? The dembots haven't been able to find a crime....Any normal President, who cared about the Nation and didnt want to see the Nation even more divided, would take a plea deal, lowering their charges, with no jail time, but some other form of punishment.
Like Clinton did for his "process crime" of perjury..., right before leaving office, with the justice department..... A fine, losing the ability to ever argue a case in the Supreme Court, his law license for 5 years.....
That kind of punishment....
If there's evidence they're lying, then you might have a point. Maybe you need to consider that not everyone is like you.
Do you have another solution?
Should we talk about Oliver North shredding documents now?I think the poster I was a agreeing with is quite bright sometimes.
We can. The fact we are shows just how transparent the admin wasShould we talk about Oliver North shredding documents now?
If you don't have a better idea, we will go with the way the system works for everyone else.Nope. It's a real problem with the system as it exists. And Trump is the worst example so far, but not hte only one.
Shredding documents to hide their culpability from Congress isn't as transparent as you think it is.We can. The fact we are shows just how transparent the admin was
"this time around" - hahaIf you don't have a better idea, we will go with the way the system works for everyone else.
It feels like you guys are building your narrative extra early this time around. It's like when Trump declared before the election that the only way he'd lose was through fraud. Now it's the only way Trump is convicted is with an unfair jury.
If you want to see a show trial, check out Durham's unethical prosecution of Danchenko."this time around" - haha
Yes....that's why most folks don't believe the demaklan is able to give anyone anything other then a Stalinist show trial
The fact you know about it, shows just how transparent the admin wasShredding documents to hide their culpability from Congress isn't as transparent as you think it is.
Is that why the conservative SCOTUS allowed a man to be executed despite critical flaws in his prosecution?No, I do understand, our system is based upon the presumption of innocence until proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Our system is built to let the guilty walk to protect the innocent. Are you wanting it to change for Trump?
If you don't have a better idea, we will go with the way the system works for everyone else.
It feels like you guys are building your narrative extra early this time around. It's like when Trump declared before the election that the only way he'd lose was through fraud. Now it's the only way Trump is convicted is with an unfair jury.
I have a suspicion that you say it CAN'T work here because you don't want it to work.No narrative here. I'm discussing the OP. I see a big problem with our system.
It CAN'T work, as it is supposed to. In at least some cases.
what's unethical about it? What was unethical was the Clinton campaign and Obama Admin hiring the Russian spy to spy on the Trump campaign and later be used to undermine the new admin.If you want to see a show trial, check out Durham's unethical prosecution of Danchenko.
You only have narratives. Not facts.