Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I didn’t say the justice system was perfect did I? I don’t know what case you are referring to, so I can’t address it but the current jury system is built to favor the guilty so once you are proven guilty it is very difficult to over turn a conviction.Is that why the conservative SCOTUS allowed a man to be executed despite critical flaws in his prosecution?
hahah Comey is a disgraced cop.Comey on Trump asking 4 a pledge of loyalty "To my mind, the demand was like Sammy the Bull's Cosa Nostra induction ceremony - with Trump, in the role of the family boss, asking me if I have what it takes to be a 'made man'."
I have a suspicion that you say it CAN'T work here because you don't want it to work.
Durham doesn't have a case. The FBI agent who worked with Danchenko testified that he didn't think Danchenko lied. He also testified that Danchenko didn't even say what Durham is accusing him of saying. This is the prosecution's own witness. Durham isn't trying to get a conviction. He's just using the trial as a means to put out his crazy conspiracy theory about Clinton and Obama. It's extremely unethical to prosecute someone when you don't have a case.what's unethical about it? What was unethical was the Clinton campaign and Obama Admin hiring the Russian spy to spy on the Trump campaign and later be used to undermine the new admin.
Igor was indicted by a grand jury.....that's a fact.
Trump hasn't been indicted, thus, your show trial.
Do you think Trump committed any crimes?No, I'm well able to think about different issues, seperately.
My point stands. Trump cannot be given a fair trail.
a plea deal on what? The dembots haven't been able to find a crime....
The current system is built to favor the rich defendants. If you're poor, the state will annihilate you and your worthless lawyers won't say anything.I didn’t say the justice system was perfect did I? I don’t know what case you are referring to, so I can’t address it but the current jury system is built to favor the guilty so once you are proven guilty it is very difficult to over turn a conviction.
How do you want it to change? Do you want different rules? Should we change the rules if Trump goes to trial?
www.commondreams.org
Then the Agent can testify for the defense...that's not a show trial....that's a trial.Durham doesn't have a case. The FBI agent who worked with Danchenko testified that he didn't think Danchenko lied. He also testified that Danchenko didn't even say what Durham is accusing him of saying. This is the prosecution's own witness. Durham isn't trying to get a conviction. He's just using the trial as a means to put out his crazy conspiracy theory about Clinton and Obama. It's extremely unethical to prosecute someone when you don't have a case.
Well actually Congress makes laws, not a President.Trump made mishandling Classified Documents a Felony
Trump signed the law making mishandling classified documents a felonyWell actually Congress makes laws, not a President.
But regards,. so what? That doesn't change what I said
What does a justice system that doesn’t favor the rich look like?The current system is built to favor the rich defendants. If you're poor, the state will annihilate you and your worthless lawyers won't say anything.
For starters, we need a judicial system that doesn't take the opinion of Justice Thomas in Shinn v Martinez Ramirez. Thoms wrote that the finality of the judicial system is more important than accuracy.
'Perverse' Supreme Court Ruling 'Effectively Ensures That Innocent People Will Remain Imprisoned'
A new "absolutely atrocious" opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing majority, one critic warned, "effectively ensures that innocent people will remain imprisoned."
In DC? A jury in DC would convict Trump of murder, even if there was video proof of someone else doing it.Republicans in Congress have already shown a willingness to ignore Trumps transgressions no matter how egregious
Is it possible to form a Jury without at least one member who is willing to accept whatever lie Trump is telling?
The agent was the prosecution's witness.Then the Agent can testify for the defense...that's not a show trial....that's a trial.
Obvioiusly the Grand Jury felt there was enough to charge the man, if the Defense has witnesses like you claim they can testify.
The facts are the facts, he is a Russian spy that Clinton and Obama used to underrmine the Trump camapign and admin....
Yes. Nothing in that law applied to a president.Trump signed the law making mishandling classified documents a felony
Is he exempt from the law he signed?
One with legitimate public defenders for starters.What does a justice system that doesn’t favor the rich look like?
of course not.....but the fact it's a felony doesn't change the elements that have to be met to make it a crime. There is no intent (Clinton standard) therefore no charges, no reasonable prosecutor would bringTrump signed the law making mishandling classified documents a felony
Is he exempt from the law he signed?
You are way behind, try to catch up, and read up on it in the news.a plea deal on what? The dembots haven't been able to find a crime....
The prosecutor called them to the stand? When?The agent was the prosecution's witness.
That should tell you how strong the case is.
I agree with that but how do you recruit legitimate public defenders? The prosecution has unlimited funding, for you to defend yourself is limited, that to me is an issue. So how do we make it more even?One with legitimate public defenders for starters.
Yesterday.The prosecutor called them to the stand? When?
