I saw this on thegunfeed.com...and followed the link.....of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world, 4 are in the United States....and all 4 of them have been run by democrats for decades....
World's 50 most violent cities revealed, and 21 of them are in Brazil
But the list doesn't just include Latin America, with U.S. cities St Louis, Baltimore, Detroit and New Orleans also featuring.
The question is...Which came first, the abject poverty or the Democrats?
Detroit was a wealthy city then progressive Democrats took it over and after 50+ years of uninterrupted rule Detroit is collapsing, it is billions of dollars in debt (yes, a single city is billions of dollars in debt) and the people who can leave are doing so. It has lost 60% of its population since 1950. Progressives take other peoples money, give it to those who are not productive and when they run out of other peoples money they begin to eat their own. That is the phase they are in now.
If progressivism was so damned good Detroit should be a model of progress and culture. Instead it looks like this...
Nothing at all to do with Nixon allowing Japan to product dump cars in exchange for air bases in southern Japan, or the big three designing and engineering crap cars in the 70's and 80's. Detroit was a company town, when the company failed, so did the town.
Considering the Democrats had been in power for over two decades by then the answer is no. No matter how much you try and blame the repubs for everything the facts are these. In 1932 the wealthiest two percent of this country controlled 76% of the nations wealth. Democrats took control of both houses of Congress and ruled them with an iron fist for 40 continuous years. They also controlled the Presidency for a good portion of that reign as well. The net result after all of that control was the wealthiest 1 percent now control 90% of this nations wealth.
So, dumbass... who were the Democrats working for? Because it sure as hell doesn't look like they were working for the poor and middle class now does it.