4 out of 50 most dangerous cities are in the U.S., guess which party runs them?

I saw this on thegunfeed.com...and followed the link.....of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world, 4 are in the United States....and all 4 of them have been run by democrats for decades....

World's 50 most violent cities revealed, and 21 of them are in Brazil

But the list doesn't just include Latin America, with U.S. cities St Louis, Baltimore, Detroit and New Orleans also featuring.

Yes most cities are run by Dems. Dem or repub are pretty much the same on a city level.


This is your excuse? The democrats buy votes from the minority make that city broke as hell and you say it is the same?

God damn a city like chicago has not had a republican mayor since the 1930s.

Stupid as pogo.

And what is the difference between a dem and repub at a city level? What great big cities have a repub?


New York had Rudy Guilliani after decades of democrats....and he cleaned up the city. Bloomberg followed his model...and now debalsio is ignoring it and following left wing beliefs on law enforcement......and we are going to see a big change.

Sure we are. So small gov repubs are for big gov law enforcement?
 
I saw this on thegunfeed.com...and followed the link.....of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world, 4 are in the United States....and all 4 of them have been run by democrats for decades....

World's 50 most violent cities revealed, and 21 of them are in Brazil

But the list doesn't just include Latin America, with U.S. cities St Louis, Baltimore, Detroit and New Orleans also featuring.

Yes most cities are run by Dems. Dem or repub are pretty much the same on a city level.


This is your excuse? The democrats buy votes from the minority make that city broke as hell and you say it is the same?

God damn a city like chicago has not had a republican mayor since the 1930s.

Stupid as pogo.

And what is the difference between a dem and repub at a city level? What great big cities have a repub?

Without looking it up I think there are like .... two. I'm thinking Cincinnati and San Diego.

It's like twelve thousand seven hundred eleventy seventeen and three-quarters..... to two.

And from that he wants to play like there's a "pattern".

Like saying "most plumbers are righthanded -- that means we'd never have any plumbing fuckups if plumbers were lefthanded".


And there is....democrats hate the police, and are easy on criminals. It is their left wing thinking getting in the way of common sense.......New York will be a nice laboratory to show how this is going to work out....

What Reduced Crime in New York City

The police measure that most consistently reduces crime is the arrest rate of those involved in crime, the study finds. Felony arrest rates (except for motor vehicle thefts) rose 50 to 70 percent in the 1990s. When arrests of burglars increased 10 percent, the number of burglaries fell 2.7 to 3.2 percent. When the arrest rate of robbers rose 10 percent, the number of robberies fell 5.7 to 5.9 percent. In the case of murder, the decline was 3.9 to 4 percent; in the case of assault, 2 to 2.4 percent; and for motor vehicle theft, 5 to 5.1 percent.

The contribution of such deterrence measures (the "stick") offers more explanation for the decline in New York City crime than the improvement in the economy, the authors conclude.

Between 1990 and 1999, homicide dropped 73 percent, burglary 66 percent, assault 40 percent, robbery 67 percent, and vehicle hoists 73 percent. The authors' model manages to explain between 33 and 86 percent of those declines.

Now we have the Ferguson effect...with democrats across the country attacking their own police forces and the murder rate going up.....

Ferguson's run by Republicans. Not that it matters, but there it is.

And I'm preeeeeeeetty sure Cincinnati and San Diego have crime just as any other city does (and no doubt you can go look up those histories and find a Democrat DA in 1976 to continue your favorite lameass fallacy)...

Matter of fact I remember from a previous thread that Cincinnati is the bedbug capital of the United States.

Conclusion: Republicans are pro-bedbug.

Be proud.
rofl.gif
 
I saw this on thegunfeed.com...and followed the link.....of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world, 4 are in the United States....and all 4 of them have been run by democrats for decades....

World's 50 most violent cities revealed, and 21 of them are in Brazil

But the list doesn't just include Latin America, with U.S. cities St Louis, Baltimore, Detroit and New Orleans also featuring.

Yes most cities are run by Dems. Dem or repub are pretty much the same on a city level.


This is your excuse? The democrats buy votes from the minority make that city broke as hell and you say it is the same?

God damn a city like chicago has not had a republican mayor since the 1930s.

Stupid as pogo.

And what is the difference between a dem and repub at a city level? What great big cities have a repub?


New York had Rudy Guilliani after decades of democrats....and he cleaned up the city. Bloomberg followed his model...and now debalsio is ignoring it and following left wing beliefs on law enforcement......and we are going to see a big change.

Sure we are. So small gov repubs are for big gov law enforcement?


Wow....you don't understand anything do you.....conservatives and republicans think the primary job of government is to keep the people safe....and you do that by having effective law enforcement.....do you guys ever think before you post....

No where does any conservative say we want "No" government, just Constitutional, and effective government that is a small as possible to give the people the most freedom. Skimping on police is not where you make government small.....
 
Yes most cities are run by Dems. Dem or repub are pretty much the same on a city level.


This is your excuse? The democrats buy votes from the minority make that city broke as hell and you say it is the same?

God damn a city like chicago has not had a republican mayor since the 1930s.

Stupid as pogo.

And what is the difference between a dem and repub at a city level? What great big cities have a repub?


New York had Rudy Guilliani after decades of democrats....and he cleaned up the city. Bloomberg followed his model...and now debalsio is ignoring it and following left wing beliefs on law enforcement......and we are going to see a big change.

Sure we are. So small gov repubs are for big gov law enforcement?


Wow....you don't understand anything do you.....conservatives and republicans think the primary job of government is to keep the people safe....and you do that by having effective law enforcement.....do you guys ever think before you post....

No where does any conservative say we want "No" government, just Constitutional, and effective government that is a small as possible to give the people the most freedom. Skimping on police is not where you make government small.....

Dems don't say they are easy in crime either. Your claims are just crazy.
 
This is your excuse? The democrats buy votes from the minority make that city broke as hell and you say it is the same?

God damn a city like chicago has not had a republican mayor since the 1930s.

Stupid as pogo.

And what is the difference between a dem and repub at a city level? What great big cities have a repub?


New York had Rudy Guilliani after decades of democrats....and he cleaned up the city. Bloomberg followed his model...and now debalsio is ignoring it and following left wing beliefs on law enforcement......and we are going to see a big change.

Sure we are. So small gov repubs are for big gov law enforcement?


Wow....you don't understand anything do you.....conservatives and republicans think the primary job of government is to keep the people safe....and you do that by having effective law enforcement.....do you guys ever think before you post....

No where does any conservative say we want "No" government, just Constitutional, and effective government that is a small as possible to give the people the most freedom. Skimping on police is not where you make government small.....

Dems don't say they are easy in crime either. Your claims are just crazy.

They never say it...they just do it.......and the people in those cities suffer.
 
And what is the difference between a dem and repub at a city level? What great big cities have a repub?


New York had Rudy Guilliani after decades of democrats....and he cleaned up the city. Bloomberg followed his model...and now debalsio is ignoring it and following left wing beliefs on law enforcement......and we are going to see a big change.

Sure we are. So small gov repubs are for big gov law enforcement?


Wow....you don't understand anything do you.....conservatives and republicans think the primary job of government is to keep the people safe....and you do that by having effective law enforcement.....do you guys ever think before you post....

No where does any conservative say we want "No" government, just Constitutional, and effective government that is a small as possible to give the people the most freedom. Skimping on police is not where you make government small.....

Dems don't say they are easy in crime either. Your claims are just crazy.

They never say it...they just do it.......and the people in those cities suffer.

And your proof is what?
 
Latin America is home to 41 of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world

And meanwhile, we sit back and allow our borders to be overan with these same fucking people.

And when someone rises up like Trump, and calls for a wall, who are the ones to quickly silence him with calls of racism, hate, etc. ?

MOTHER FUCKING GODDAMN LIBERALS !!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Yes most cities are run by Dems. Dem or repub are pretty much the same on a city level.


Two example Cities: DET and STL. Way back (50 years) they were populous rich and growing. Maybe #1,2 in Nation. Dems took over, all Dems all the time and now you see what is left. Tax policy and other regulations killed off golden goose. There are papers written about both.
 
Ferguson's run by Republicans. Not that it matters, but there it is.


nice try. Come on. STL and all North suburbs have been Dem hellholes forever. Now you get a token R (phony?) to accept the job and you begin to spin.
 
Yes most cities are run by Dems. Dem or repub are pretty much the same on a city level.


Two example Cities: DET and STL. Way back (50 years) they were populous rich and growing. Maybe #1,2 in Nation. Dems took over, all Dems all the time and now you see what is left. Tax policy and other regulations killed off golden goose. There are papers written about both.

Repubs are so great they can't get elected. Go figure.
 
Yes most cities are run by Dems. Dem or repub are pretty much the same on a city level.


Two example Cities: DET and STL. Way back (50 years) they were populous rich and growing. Maybe #1,2 in Nation. Dems took over, all Dems all the time and now you see what is left. Tax policy and other regulations killed off golden goose. There are papers written about both.

So with mostly dem mayors our crime rates are at the lowest in recorded history...
 
Repubs are so great they can't get elected. Go figure.

Brain, you make a good point. How did the Dems get into power for 50 straight years if Repubs were so great? I don't have an answer for why STL was going along good then........suddenly they all Dem all the time, high taxes, regulations, corruption. Jobs, rich, white all leave. Why did it start?
 
Repubs are so great they can't get elected. Go figure.

Brain, you make a good point. How did the Dems get into power for 50 straight years if Repubs were so great? I don't have an answer for why STL was going along good then........suddenly they all Dem all the time, high taxes, regulations, corruption. Jobs, rich, white all leave. Why did it start?

Repubs should figure out why that is for sure.
 
Ferguson's run by Republicans. Not that it matters, but there it is.


nice try. Come on. STL and all North suburbs have been Dem hellholes forever. Now you get a token R (phony?) to accept the job and you begin to spin.

Look --- the poster brought up Ferguson, and the same poster keeps trotting out the association fallacy. So I turned his own tables on him stating a fact.

It would be sitting in the above quote if you hadn't stripped it out to remove the context. That's dishonest on your part.

*DO NOT* edit the context out of my posts.
 
I saw this on thegunfeed.com...and followed the link.....of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world, 4 are in the United States....and all 4 of them have been run by democrats for decades....

World's 50 most violent cities revealed, and 21 of them are in Brazil

But the list doesn't just include Latin America, with U.S. cities St Louis, Baltimore, Detroit and New Orleans also featuring.

The question is...Which came first, the abject poverty or the Democrats?












Detroit was a wealthy city then progressive Democrats took it over and after 50+ years of uninterrupted rule Detroit is collapsing, it is billions of dollars in debt (yes, a single city is billions of dollars in debt) and the people who can leave are doing so. It has lost 60% of its population since 1950. Progressives take other peoples money, give it to those who are not productive and when they run out of other peoples money they begin to eat their own. That is the phase they are in now.

If progressivism was so damned good Detroit should be a model of progress and culture. Instead it looks like this...


ShockBlast_ruins-of-detroit-yves-marchand-romain-meffre-221.jpg
IMG_4842.jpg
slide_15629_218546_huge.jpg
original.jpg
 
So in your feeble mind if functionally illiterate negroes would be paid $15 an hour for flipping burgers everything would be fine? Check out the total fuck-up that is ongoing in Seattle asshole!

Name one business that can't afford $15.00/hr to flip burgers.
 
I saw this on thegunfeed.com...and followed the link.....of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world, 4 are in the United States....and all 4 of them have been run by democrats for decades....

World's 50 most violent cities revealed, and 21 of them are in Brazil

But the list doesn't just include Latin America, with U.S. cities St Louis, Baltimore, Detroit and New Orleans also featuring.

The question is...Which came first, the abject poverty or the Democrats?












Detroit was a wealthy city then progressive Democrats took it over and after 50+ years of uninterrupted rule Detroit is collapsing, it is billions of dollars in debt (yes, a single city is billions of dollars in debt) and the people who can leave are doing so. It has lost 60% of its population since 1950. Progressives take other peoples money, give it to those who are not productive and when they run out of other peoples money they begin to eat their own. That is the phase they are in now.

If progressivism was so damned good Detroit should be a model of progress and culture. Instead it looks like this...


ShockBlast_ruins-of-detroit-yves-marchand-romain-meffre-221.jpg
IMG_4842.jpg
slide_15629_218546_huge.jpg
original.jpg

Nothing at all to do with Nixon allowing Japan to product dump cars in exchange for air bases in southern Japan, or the big three designing and engineering crap cars in the 70's and 80's. Detroit was a company town, when the company failed, so did the town.
 

Forum List

Back
Top