The Right Wing had better be right about this "Deep State" stuff.

[M14 Shooter]

Quote the full post and think again

No need - your "are you kidding me" and "there are no other reasons" response indicates, prima facie, you know you cannot show how your example is a concrete illustration that Trump acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty.

But then, Mueller couldn't do it, so its no surprise you can't

See, Mueller, himself, stated that other motives must be considered -- that is, Trump may have had a motive other than to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty.

Still waiting for your answer: How is he wrong and you are right?

 

[jc456]

You brainwashed functional morons will accept any reason except the obvious... The Russians were screwing with our election, the Trump campaign was meeting with them and it needed to be investigated- for Christ's sake you're goddamn idiots....

So, you -do- understand the need for an investigation into the Obama administration fraudulently using the apparatus of state as a means to further the election of one Hillary Clinton.
Thanks!

As with all your ridiculous propaganda phony scandals, all you idiots are missing is evidence intelligence and any connection to the real world....

how did mueller miss it then? fk dude, he spent fking 30 million to miss what you know. amazing I must say. you are in the now bubba!!!!

 

[AntonToo]

That's right, even though there was no underlying crime, the perjury was still chargable.

Because perjury, itself, is a crime

Yes, just as Obstruction, itself, is a crime.

Get it dummy?

 

[M14 Shooter]

cause he is a whacked out lunatic from the left with assburn? And Mueller had to follow the law?

He only serves to further prove the left is desperate to hang on to The Narrative for as long as it possibly can.

 

[AntonToo]

Quote the full post and think again

No need - your "are you kidding me" and "there are no other reasons"

Well then GO AHEAD - tell us what proper reason there could possibly be for Trump to interfere in the investigation of Flynn, who Trump knew damn well lied to VP and the FBI.

 

[Faun]

???? Where the fuck do you see "government was spying on the Trump campaign" in the report?

Where the hell do you see Trump being cleared of Obstruction in the report?


Barr did not state facts. He lied and mislead the American public.

Mueller even went so far as to send him a letter of concern - a document he knew will be a historic rebuke of Barr's handling of the report.

You can't release transcripts of private Conversations between The President and The Leaders of Mexico, Australia, and Thailand without Government Spying on The President.

Also The Illegal Unmasking is also proof of The Government Spying on The Trump Campaign.

Remember Obama Bin Sucking Deek spied on Merkel?
or did you forget he spied on Journalists too?

Obama Bin Spying was a Stone Cold Criminal.

Worst President in US History.

LOL

Dumbfuck, those transcripts were released by the White House. Are you claiming trump was spying on himself??

Yeah, sure, uh-huh..... the WH was spying on Trump, not Obama holdovers.

Dumbfuck, those transcripts were released by the White House. Are you claiming trump was spying on himself??

Transcripts of Trump's calls with Mexican, Australian leaders reveal president worried about the politics of immigration

President Trump told Mexico's president that a proposed border wall between the two countries was "the least important thing we are talking about," according to a transcript of the January call published by the Washington Post on Thursday.

The Post said it obtained the transcripts of Trump’s talks with President Enrique Peña Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull from White House staff.​

... I know, I know, it sucks having a Liberal blow up your nonsensical conspiracies. Too bad.

Speaking of conspiracies... why do you refuse to post a link the that conspiracy you posted to me earlier? Exactly how disreputable is your source??

Your first mistake is quoting the Washington Compost.
Your second mistake is buying this story that Trump’s staff leaked it.

LOL

Great, let's see your evidence the transcripts didn't come from White House staff.....

 

[M14 Shooter]

That's right, even though there was no underlying crime, the perjury was still chargable.

Because perjury, itself, is a crime

Yes, just as Obstruction, itself, is a crime.

Yes.
When the obstructive actions are taken with a provable corrupt intent.
Get it dummy?

 

[The Original Tree]

That's right, even though there was no underlying crime, the perjury was still chargable.

Because perjury, itself, is a crime

Yes, just as Obstruction, itself, is a crime.

Get it dummy?

Not when there is No Crime to Obstruct.

Mueller was charged with making such determinations and he punted and left it up to Barr.

Now you can return to your regularly scheduled fantasies of riding bare back with Broke Back Putin.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Court ordered surveillance. Properly adjudicated.
Obviously then the warrant was not " illegally gotten".

based on a bogus unverified document, makes it illegal. and those who presented it in trouble.

You don't know what it was "based on", dope.
What you do know is that it was approved. Four separate times.
Approval means the supporting documentation was obviously acceptable to the judge.

If that crap was acceptable to The Judge, then The Judge was crooked too.

Abolish FISA.

DemNazis Hate them Some Guantanamo Bay, but Love THE FISA COURT that put those people there.

Explain that one Lib Tards?

LOL...
There it is. The judge is now crooked too.
And the conspiracy grows.

Well, how else to you explain a FISA Warrant based on Russian Propaganda, that was never verified, and that everyone knew was paid for by The Clinton Obama Political Operations?

Since it's obvious and was proven there was No Russian Collusion, then either The FISA Court is Corrupt, or the People Submitting False Affidavits are Corrupt.

So which is it?

Was it crooked Obama FISA Judges?

Or was it a crooked Obama FBI and DOJ Leadership that was committed Treason?

OR WERE THEY WORKING TOGETHER TO OVERTHROW OUR ELECTIONS?

Someone is going to go to jail from The Obama-Clinton Cabal.

So why don't you get out in front of this, and tell us who you think is going to hang from your favorite political party?

Well, how else to you explain a FISA Warrant based on Russian Propaganda, that was never verified, and that everyone knew was paid for by The Clinton Obama Political Operations?

LOL....that's easy.
Because that shit isn't real.

Don't you ever question why your conspiracy is forced to expand every time you hit a brick wall?

You believe that warrant proves something. What?
What information was gleaned from it and how has it been used agaist Trump?

You keep harping on "spying" but have yet to show how anyone was harmed by it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Quote the full post and think again

No need - your "are you kidding me" and "there are no other reasons"

Well then GO AHEAD - tell what proper reason....

Oh, no no no.
It's your claim, and thus, burden of proof is on you.
And you can't meet it,
And you know it.

Still waiting for your answer: How is Mueller wrong and you are right?

 

[AntonToo]

That's right, even though there was no underlying crime, the perjury was still chargable.

Because perjury, itself, is a crime

Yes, just as Obstruction, itself, is a crime.

Yes.
When the obstructive actions are taken with a provable corrupt intent.
Get it dummy?

The conversation you butted into was about a poster trying to say that Obstruction needs an underlying crime.

Read the conversation before throwing in your two cents.

 

[Dick Foster]

Lol you don't know what youa re reading - Mueller is talking about a demanding standard, not that it's a standard that can't be met.

Mueller states specifically:
the absence of that evidence affects the analysis of the President’s intent and requires consideration of other possible motives for his conduct."

If other motives must be considered, how can there be a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others?

Where in the report does Mueller provide a concrete illustration that Trump acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others?

How is he wrong and how are you right?

wtf?...what is contradictory between CONSIDERING and finding a clear patern of corrupt actions that show intent?

Nothing is the answer. Just as there is no contradiction between what Mueller states in the report and what I told you.

Mueller DID NOT say that Obstruction is not provable based on the 10 episodes his report lays out.

Mueller says invest in more Anal Lube, because The Left just Fucked Themselves for 2020.

Plus they're gonna need a lot of the stuff when they're bunking with Bubba after the dust settles and the smoke clears.

 

[The Original Tree]

You can't release transcripts of private Conversations between The President and The Leaders of Mexico, Australia, and Thailand without Government Spying on The President.

Also The Illegal Unmasking is also proof of The Government Spying on The Trump Campaign.

Remember Obama Bin Sucking Deek spied on Merkel?
or did you forget he spied on Journalists too?

Obama Bin Spying was a Stone Cold Criminal.

Worst President in US History.

LOL

Dumbfuck, those transcripts were released by the White House. Are you claiming trump was spying on himself??

Yeah, sure, uh-huh..... the WH was spying on Trump, not Obama holdovers.

Dumbfuck, those transcripts were released by the White House. Are you claiming trump was spying on himself??

Transcripts of Trump's calls with Mexican, Australian leaders reveal president worried about the politics of immigration

President Trump told Mexico's president that a proposed border wall between the two countries was "the least important thing we are talking about," according to a transcript of the January call published by the Washington Post on Thursday.

The Post said it obtained the transcripts of Trump’s talks with President Enrique Peña Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull from White House staff.​

... I know, I know, it sucks having a Liberal blow up your nonsensical conspiracies. Too bad.

Speaking of conspiracies... why do you refuse to post a link the that conspiracy you posted to me earlier? Exactly how disreputable is your source??

Your first mistake is quoting the Washington Compost.
Your second mistake is buying this story that Trump’s staff leaked it.

LOL

Great, let's see your evidence the transcripts didn't come from White House staff.....

So let me get this straight..... Trump releases his own transcripts of his own conversations wth World Leaders to newspapers who regularly trash him to make himself look bad.......because?

And then he goes and Unmasks everyone Obama and Clinton targeted with their illegal surveillance......for what reason?????

Let's see your evidence to prove you aren't a Transgender Cross Dressing Failure in Life with No Job, and No Prospects to ever be anything but a drag queen dancing in a glass booth at an adult book store.

And while we are at it, we want to see your tax returns to prove you aren't getting paid by Putin McFaun.

And your birth certificate and immigration status to prove you are human and not a Russian Illegal Immigrant

 

[AntonToo]

That's right, even though there was no underlying crime, the perjury was still chargable.

Because perjury, itself, is a crime

Yes, just as Obstruction, itself, is a crime.

Get it dummy?

Not when there is No Crime to Obstruct.

M14, here is your chance to explain to the Original Tree where he goes wrong.

I'm not holding my breath on that one

 

[francoHFW]

You brainwashed functional morons will accept any reason except the obvious... The Russians were screwing with our election, the Trump campaign was meeting with them and it needed to be investigated- for Christ's sake you're goddamn idiots....

So, you -do- understand the need for an investigation into the Obama administration fraudulently using the apparatus of state as a means to further the election of one Hillary Clinton.
Thanks!

As with all your ridiculous propaganda phony scandals, all you idiots are missing is evidence intelligence and any connection to the real world....

how did mueller miss it then? fk dude, he spent fking 30 million to miss what you know. amazing I must say. you are in the now bubba!!!!

Mueller simply put out the evidence and said that since a president can't be indicted he was done. Republican like barr also doesn't believe a president can be indicted. Now we are going to see whether they can be impeached- first we have to investigate, because we are not going to leave it up to a whole bunch of Republicans to decide. Despite your propaganda that is totally fos. Your GOP a****** Heroes had 5 investigations of the Foster murder LOL and 8 of Benghazi, so please shove your idiocy up your ass, brainwashed functional moron....

 

[MarcATL]

Remember this when Brennan is in Gitmo for treason

OK.

 

[The Original Tree]

That's right, even though there was no underlying crime, the perjury was still chargable.

Because perjury, itself, is a crime

Yes, just as Obstruction, itself, is a crime.

Yes.
When the obstructive actions are taken with a provable corrupt intent.
Get it dummy?

Dumbass, the conversation you butted into was about a poster trying to say that Obstruction needs an underlying crime.

Read the conversation before throwing in your two cents.

No it doesn't.

You are allowed to defend yourself against abuses of power, and abuses of law enforcement.

Ever hear of The Right To Privacy?

How about any of these?
The Right to an Attorney
The Right to organize and mount a defense against charges levied at you.
The Right to a trial by a jury of your peers.
The Right to Face Your Accusers and See Evidence that is against you.
The Right to Due Process
The Right to defend yourself against Libel & Slander
Probable Cause
The Right to Face Your Accusers & Cross Examine them
The Right to petition the courts for a redress of grievances
The Right to request a change of venue, or to claim a juror, judge, officer of the court, or investigator, prosecutor be removed from a case for a conflict of interest.
The RIght to have Exculpatory Evidence Entered as Evidence on Your Behalf.
The Right to be secure in your effects and possessions
The Right to Free Speech.
The Fifth Amendment.

You cannot charge a person with Obstruction of Justice for doing anything they can to put a halt an Injustice.

In fact it is entirely LEGAL to refuse to cooperate with anyone pursuing false charges against you.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That's right, even though there was no underlying crime, the perjury was still chargable.

Because perjury, itself, is a crime

Yes, just as Obstruction, itself, is a crime.

Yes.
When the obstructive actions are taken with a provable corrupt intent.
Get it dummy?

The conversation you butted into was about a poster trying to say that Obstruction needs an underlying crime.

It doesn't.
But, absent an underlying crime, motives other than corrupt intent must be considered.
Dumbass.

 

[AntonToo]

Quote the full post and think again

No need - your "are you kidding me" and "there are no other reasons"

Well then GO AHEAD - tell what proper reason....

Oh, no no no.
It's your claim, and thus, burden of proof is on you.
And you can't meet it,
And you know it.

Still waiting for your answer: How is Mueller wrong and you are right?

There is no proper reason. Thats why you can't think of one.

Any reasonable jury would find corrupt intent here and the only reason you don't want to admit the obvious is due to your emotional investment into Trump presidency.

 

[jc456]

Lol you don't know what youa re reading - Mueller is talking about a demanding standard, not that it's a standard that can't be met.

Mueller states specifically:
the absence of that evidence affects the analysis of the President’s intent and requires consideration of other possible motives for his conduct."

If other motives must be considered, how can there be a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others?

Where in the report does Mueller provide a concrete illustration that Trump acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others?

How is he wrong and how are you right?

wtf?...what is contradictory between CONSIDERING and finding a clear patern of corrupt actions that show intent?

You avoided the questions. I'll ask again:

If other motives must be considered, how can there be a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others?

Where in the report does Mueller provide a concrete illustration that Trump acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others?

How is he wrong and how are you right?

And you clearly denying the obvious - Mueller DID NOT say that intent cannot be reasonably established.


I gave you an exmaple of Trump pressuring Comey to drop investigation into a guilty man named Flynn.

Go ahead, consider the motives and tell us in what fucking world that is done without a corrupt intent.

dude, it's quite obvious you're going to stand on a sinking ship. there is no reason to discuss a subject with someone like you who has already made up his/ her mind that something happened that wasn't actually reported. there is no resolution to that. We all know that there was no intent because mueller stated so many times in his report. you can do a search on it.