Letterman Flings Slime at 14-Year-Old Willow Palin

[AllieBaba]

Not only can the admin not read PM's, the only people here who seems interested in "grooming" anyone are those with an obsessive focus on a 14 year old's sexual behavior, wouldn't you say? How is that different than Ted Haggard's condemnations of homosexuality?

The admin and the moderators can read pms.

Are you breaking a sweat?

no, generally we can't. we can only read them if they're reported/forwarded by a member.

GENERALLY....UNLESS.......

That's mods, as I said, who have authority as granted by admin. You can be authorized to access them, I'm sure.

Anyway, as I said. They can be accessed. Big diff between can't and won't...while you probably don't have the authority, del, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

The admin can access them.

 

[Agnapostate]

How strange, because a mod told me they could read pms, long before Agna started piddling around here.

And from my perusal of the rules, I don't see any indication they can't.

Having been the admin of my own message board, I KNOW they have that ability. You can't "opt out" of the ability to access PMs. It's part of being an admin, and depending on the level of authority allowed, a mod as well.

Maybe DEL doesn't have the authority to access PMs, but believe me, the admin does. They state they won't USE that authority...

But "won't" and "can't" are two wildly divergent things.

Honestly, you sound a little nervous. So I must have hit a nerve with the commentary on grooming. Good.

You've shown rather expansive ignorance of vBulletin in the past, if you recall. It's theoretically possible for someone with database access to read PM's (they're stored in plain text), and there is a plug-in to enable admins to simply read them normally, but that's not the default setting on vB boards, and the admin of this board has stated that that plug-in is not enabled on this board, nor will it be. So please try not to make up bullshit.

 

[Agnapostate]

Morality, as you should be aware given your own weird take on things, is completely subjective. You can't "prove" immorality unless you come to some sort of agreement what morality consists of.

So those of conservative values who think his comments were immoral have no obligation to "prove" they're immoral. Though we all know that sex between adults and children is ILLEGAL...as is child porn. That's a little different.

Is that right? You didn't strike me as a moral relativist, but I guess we all have our deficiencies. At any rate, my own moral perspective is a consequentialist one; I define moral rightness and wrongness according to happiness and suffering. At our meta-ethical core, I think we all retain that sort of perspective.

 

[AllieBaba]

Whatever.

 

[Agnapostate]

Whatever.

Stop your derailing bullshit anyway. I think you have an inquisition to lead against Newt Gingrich.

 

[AllieBaba]

No, I don't mind Newt.

 

[oreo]

I thought the children of political figures were off limits to the media? What a despicable display for a 6' foot man--in front of a laughing audiance--making remarks about Sarah Palins daughter. Unbelievable.

You know funny is funny. But when a comedian goes out of their way to take a shot at the children of political figures in a vial & hurtful manner--it really insults the intelligence of us all. Let alone a 6 foot man attacking two women. To me now--David Letterman is a JOKE OF A MAN.

Sarah Palin is not running for election--she just showed up in New York--& went to a Yankee's baseball game. Can the left wing media leave her & her family alone for crying out loud.

Every woman in this country regardless if you are a democrat or republican---regardless if you like Sarah Palin or not--should be outraged over this!

There is absolutely nothing funny about it--it's a disgusting attack on the female gender.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5g8kE_g-YA]YouTube - Letterman on Sarah Palin's Daughter[/ame]

 

[Agnapostate]

No, I don't mind Newt.

Then you're merely inconsistent. As I understand it, this is your argument.

Premise 1: Advocates of the abolition of adolescence and earlier integration of youth into adult society through drastic re-construction of currently existing age restrictions are “advocates of underage sex.”

Premise 2: New Gingrich is an advocate of the abolition of adolescence and earlier integration of youth into adult society through drastic re-construction of currently existing age restrictions.

Conclusion: Therefore, Newt Gingrich is an “advocate of underage sex.”

Which component of that misrepresents your position?

 

[Agnapostate]

A protected class based on gender? I thought that's what those pinko libs did, damn it!

 

[AllieBaba]

As I knew you would, you entered into a thread about disgusting sexual commentary regarding children, and have hijacked it to be about legalizing sex with children.

Give the pervert a cookie.

 

[KittenKoder]

let me say this slow you libtard.. a 60 year old man joking that a 14 year old had sex with a sportsfigure for political potshots is just fucking obscene,, now if you don't get that then that's you. not me. havacupakarma

Now I'm a liberal again ... sheesh ... make up your minds.

If it's based on fact then it doesn't matter, deed done, if we don't laugh at our stupidity then we will become it. If he wasn't joking then I could see why it's wrong, but he was joking, that's his job, I defended Rush when he made his lame jokes, and I will defend David to. Unlike the hypocrites I don't discriminate based on political alignment.

bullfuckingshit, you want to hide behind that "free speech mantra" sure he excercised free speech,, and I'm excercising mine in telling him and you he's an obscene excuse for a human being..

I defended Rush's right to call any woman who disagreed with him a dike, that's sexual harassment ... but it's also freedom of speech, so no, it's not bullshit. There are more examples of your hypocrisy than you can find from me. Tell me where I had ever bashed Rush for his idiotic statements ... just one ...

 

[Agnapostate]

As I knew you would, you entered into a thread about disgusting sexual commentary regarding children, and have hijacked it to be about legalizing sex with children.

Give the pervert a cookie.

WHOA! Nice show of:

Now, can you answer my question, Allie? Or is it going to be more of your lame, pathetic deflection? Your blatant inconsistency isn't being hidden from anyone.

 

[AllieBaba]

KK..it's "dyke". A "dike" is a dam....er, the water kind. Not the female kind.

Which makes it rather confusing, actually.

 

[KittenKoder]

KK..it's "dyke". A "dike" is a dam....er, the water kind. Not the female kind.

Which makes it rather confusing, actually.

Ack, sorry, spell check changed it and I didn't double check.

 

[strollingbones]

did you protest when they made fun of amy carter and chelse clinton? i thought not. but nice try to disguise yourself as objective

 

[strollingbones]

and if gov winky aint still running for shit ...why is there a banner ad to donate to her pac?

or does she just need the support for her large family. *wink* you betta cha

 

[WillowTree]

did you protest when they made fun of amy carter and chelse clinton? i thought not. but nice try to disguise yourself as objective

do you have a link to where somebody joked about 14 year old Clinton or Carter being sexually raped by a sportsstar? I would like to see it and condemn it..TIA

 

[AllieBaba]

Provide a link to a right wing comic making sex jokes about Amy Carter or Chelsea Clinton.

This is standard lefty fare.

 

[Agnapostate]

Again...this isn't difficult. Unless "White House dog" isn't an insult, of course...

 

[strollingbones]

did you tube exist with amy carter and what was the sexual comment? i dont watch letterman....unlike you allie...i dont watch and bitch...my remote has a on and off button...and other channels....if you dont like what the man said complain to his sponsors and dont watch or boycott his sponsors....