Letterman Flings Slime at 14-Year-Old Willow Palin

[Agnapostate]

No - Letterman joked about an adult having sex with a 14 year old. That is rape.

Oh. Statutory rape. Not exactly equivalent in any sense of the term. Legitimate rape involves force or open coercion; statutory rape, even in the worst sense, involves manipulation.

 

[Sinatra]

Now you indicate you have not even seen the footage.

So you are commenting on a subject of which you have no actual knowledge of.

Yup - you're the least intelligent of any in here.

You may even put Bobo to shame...

Do I know you, worm? You seem to be just another of the mass of puppet clowns on here. When you have anything other than your idiotic talking points to offer, let me know.

In the meantime, please refer to the specific mentions of rape and prostitution, respectively.

So I am correct - you have not actually seen the footage?

Alas, you have become your own worst enemy...

 

[KittenKoder]

You are absolutely right,, anyone who condones this obscene behavior towards a 14 year old girl deserves every bit of bad karma that comes their way!

Obscene? Calling someone a slut! *gasp* Quick, arrest all the boys in school!

let me say this slow you libtard.. a 60 year old man joking that a 14 year old had sex with a sportsfigure for political potshots is just fucking obscene,, now if you don't get that then that's you. not me. havacupakarma

Now I'm a liberal again ... sheesh ... make up your minds.

If it's based on fact then it doesn't matter, deed done, if we don't laugh at our stupidity then we will become it. If he wasn't joking then I could see why it's wrong, but he was joking, that's his job, I defended Rush when he made his lame jokes, and I will defend David to. Unlike the hypocrites I don't discriminate based on political alignment.

 

[Sinatra]

No - Letterman joked about an adult having sex with a 14 year old. That is rape.

Oh. Statutory rape. Not exactly equivalent in any sense of the term. Legitimate rape involves force or open coercion; statutory rape, even in the worst sense, involves manipulation.

Thank you for the shades of rape performance!

Oh what a dance of excuses you are mustering for us all!

Not much brilliance to be found in you - but sheer effort to be sure.

You work hard - much like a dishwasher...

 

[WillowTree]

Obscene? Calling someone a slut! *gasp* Quick, arrest all the boys in school!

let me say this slow you libtard.. a 60 year old man joking that a 14 year old had sex with a sportsfigure for political potshots is just fucking obscene,, now if you don't get that then that's you. not me. havacupakarma

Now I'm a liberal again ... sheesh ... make up your minds.

If it's based on fact then it doesn't matter, deed done, if we don't laugh at our stupidity then we will become it. If he wasn't joking then I could see why it's wrong, but he was joking, that's his job, I defended Rush when he made his lame jokes, and I will defend David to. Unlike the hypocrites I don't discriminate based on political alignment.

bullfuckingshit, you want to hide behind that "free speech mantra" sure he excercised free speech,, and I'm excercising mine in telling him and you he's an obscene excuse for a human being..

 

[Sinatra]

Obscene? Calling someone a slut! *gasp* Quick, arrest all the boys in school!

let me say this slow you libtard.. a 60 year old man joking that a 14 year old had sex with a sportsfigure for political potshots is just fucking obscene,, now if you don't get that then that's you. not me. havacupakarma

Now I'm a liberal again ... sheesh ... make up your minds.

If it's based on fact then it doesn't matter, deed done, if we don't laugh at our stupidity then we will become it. If he wasn't joking then I could see why it's wrong, but he was joking, that's his job, I defended Rush when he made his lame jokes, and I will defend David to. Unlike the hypocrites I don't discriminate based on political alignment.

I could care less "what you are" politically - just trying to determine if you are an amoral moron or a simple coward - or perhaps something better than either?

So answer the contextual question please.

 

[Agnapostate]

Thank you for the shades of rape performance!

Oh what a dance of excuses you are mustering for us all!

Not much brilliance to be found in you - but sheer effort to be sure.

You work hard - much like a dishwasher...

As far as I can tell, not much brilliance comes from you; you lacked the capacity to even begin to comprehend the comments I made yesterday about the nature of wage labor and capitalism's anti-libertarian elements.

Regardless, it's entirely irrelevant. If he'd made a funny joke about full-fledged rape, I still would have laughed. Have you not heard of dark humor? That said, drawing some equivalence between statutory rape and violent rape is undoubtedly an insult to actual rape victims, as opposed to those merely declared rape victims by an intrusive government that discriminates on the basis of age rather than ability.

 

[Maple]

I support freedom of speech but when it involves babies and minors it's a whole different thing. Posting sexual jokes about babies and children is also promoting child porn and it should not be accepted by anyone and in fact could be illegal. Child pornography sure is and to think that there are people like Manifold and Mountainman that think they are being funny by posting this crap is enough to make anyone hope and pray that they do not have a child at their disposal.

 

[Agnapostate]

I support freedom of speech but when it involves babies and minors it's a whole different thing. Posting sexual jokes about babies and children is also promoting child porn and it should not be accepted by anyone and in fact could be illegal.

"Could be" illegal, in this day and age of restricted free speech, but almost undoubtedly not illegal. That said, few rightists seem to be knowledgeable of such realities; AllieBabble thought she could get me in prison for adopting an ideological stance that she disliked.

 

[Sinatra]

Obscene? Calling someone a slut! *gasp* Quick, arrest all the boys in school!

let me say this slow you libtard.. a 60 year old man joking that a 14 year old had sex with a sportsfigure for political potshots is just fucking obscene,, now if you don't get that then that's you. not me. havacupakarma

Now I'm a liberal again ... sheesh ... make up your minds.

If it's based on fact then it doesn't matter, deed done, if we don't laugh at our stupidity then we will become it. If he wasn't joking then I could see why it's wrong, but he was joking, that's his job, I defended Rush when he made his lame jokes, and I will defend David to. Unlike the hypocrites I don't discriminate based on political alignment.

That doesn't even make sense in the context of this thread.

So have you even seen the footage of which we are referencing?

Are you like that other Agno creature who was spouting off only to reveal they had not even seen the footage either?

Good lord people, educate yourselves before involvement in a discussion...

 

[AllieBaba]

Well so far our only ADMITTED child porn/child sex proponent is Agna.

 

[Sinatra]

Thank you for the shades of rape performance!

Oh what a dance of excuses you are mustering for us all!

Not much brilliance to be found in you - but sheer effort to be sure.

You work hard - much like a dishwasher...

As far as I can tell, not much brilliance comes from you; you lacked the capacity to even begin to comprehend the comments I made yesterday about the nature of wage labor and capitalism's anti-libertarian elements.

Regardless, it's entirely irrelevant. If he'd made a funny joke about full-fledged rape, I still would have laughed. Have you not heard of dark humor? That said, drawing some equivalence between statutory rape and violent rape is undoubtedly an insult to actual rape victims, as opposed to those merely declared rape victims by an intrusive government that discriminates on the basis of age rather than ability.

Ah, now you reveal your desire for underage sex!!!

Keep talking Agno - reveal yourself to the rest of us.

No wonder you found no offense in Lettermans sexual demeaning of a 14-year old girl...

 

[AllieBaba]

I support freedom of speech but when it involves babies and minors it's a whole different thing. Posting sexual jokes about babies and children is also promoting child porn and it should not be accepted by anyone and in fact could be illegal.

"Could be" illegal, in this day and age of restricted free speech, but almost undoubtedly not illegal. That said, few rightists seem to be knowledgeable of such realities; AllieBabble thought she could get me in prison for adopting an ideological stance that she disliked.

No, I thought I could get you in prison if I could get somebody to investigate you.

As far as freedom of speech goes, I'm all for it. I've never once said you belong in prison for saying children should be available for sex, or for telling me you fantasize about children in classrooms....I think you belong in prison for being a babyraper. Not for talking about it.

I hope that all you do is fantasize about it.

 

[Agnapostate]

Are you like that other Agno creature who was spouting off only to reveal they had not even seen the footage either?

Yeah, try again, slappy. Dispute of your definitions is not equivalent to ignorance of the footage.

Well so far our only ADMITTED child porn/child sex proponent is Agna.

Allie, dear, aren't you the one with the obsessive focus with mentions of 14 year old Willow Palin's sexual behavior? The rest of us really didn't give a shit.

 

[AllieBaba]

Hopefully the admin screens your pms carefully for grooming behavior.

 

[Sinatra]

I support freedom of speech but when it involves babies and minors it's a whole different thing. Posting sexual jokes about babies and children is also promoting child porn and it should not be accepted by anyone and in fact could be illegal.

"Could be" illegal, in this day and age of restricted free speech, but almost undoubtedly not illegal. That said, few rightists seem to be knowledgeable of such realities; AllieBabble thought she could get me in prison for adopting an ideological stance that she disliked.

No, I thought I could get you in prison if I could get somebody to investigate you.

As far as freedom of speech goes, I'm all for it. I've never once said you belong in prison for saying children should be available for sex, or for telling me you fantasize about children in classrooms....I think you belong in prison for being a babyraper. Not for talking about it.
I hope that all you do is fantasize about it.

Agna said those things!???

My God.

I don't think KK would wish to have been associated with the likes of him in this thread.

 

[Agnapostate]

Ah, now you reveal your desire for underage sex!!!

Keep talking Agno - reveal yourself to the rest of us.

No wonder you found no offense in Lettermans sexual demeaning of a 14-year old girl...

Actually, Dinatra, the fact that such a topic could even be utilized as a target of dark humor reveals its taboo nature. If I had some interest in its "normalization," then it would be entirely nonsensical for me to defend its use as a source of dark humor.

No, I thought I could get you in prison if I could get somebody to investigate you.

As far as freedom of speech goes, I'm all for it. I've never once said you belong in prison for saying children should be available for sex, or for telling me you fantasize about children in classrooms....I think you belong in prison for being a babyraper. Not for talking about it.

I hope that all you do is fantasize about it.

No, you're not, and have several times falsely claimed that I "advocate illegal activity." You just don't realize that free speech is far more expansive than you seem to think it. For instance, I couldn't win a libel suit against you, even though you've written bullshit lies on here about me. See how that works?

 

[Agnapostate]

Hopefully the admin screens your pms carefully for grooming behavior.

Not only can the admin not read PM's, the only people here who seems interested in "grooming" anyone are those with an obsessive focus on a 14 year old's sexual behavior, wouldn't you say? How is that different than Ted Haggard's condemnations of homosexuality?

 

[Sinatra]

Ah, now you reveal your desire for underage sex!!!

Keep talking Agno - reveal yourself to the rest of us.

No wonder you found no offense in Lettermans sexual demeaning of a 14-year old girl...

Actually, Dinatra, the fact that such a topic could even be utilized as a target of dark humor reveals its taboo nature. If I had some interest in its "normalization," then it would be entirely nonsensical for me to defend its use as a source of dark humor.

No, I thought I could get you in prison if I could get somebody to investigate you.

As far as freedom of speech goes, I'm all for it. I've never once said you belong in prison for saying children should be available for sex, or for telling me you fantasize about children in classrooms....I think you belong in prison for being a babyraper. Not for talking about it.

I hope that all you do is fantasize about it.

No, you're not, and have several times falsely claimed that I "advocate illegal activity." You just don't realize that free speech is far more expansive than you seem to think it. For instance, I couldn't win a libel suit against you, even though you've written bullshit lies on here about me. See how that works?

Clearly you two are privy to some personal information shared with each other that frankly, I want no part of.

Agno, you have indisputably indicated support of underrage sex in this very thread.

That says enough about your character that any of us need know...

 

[Agnapostate]

Clearly you two are privy to some personal information shared with each other that frankly, I want no part of.

Agno, you have indisputably indicated support of underrage sex in this very thread.

That says enough about your character that any of us need know...

Dude...I knew you were kinda dim, but are you actually stupid enough to believe that I spontaneously decided to send Allie here a PM describing my fantasies about children in classrooms? I mean really, are you really this stupid?