Are you a board monitor now?This is not a linguistic discussion.
Deception alert!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are you a board monitor now?This is not a linguistic discussion.
Do you want to bet?
(John 5:46)
If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me.
(John 14:9)
"Dont you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father."
(John 20:28)
Thomas said to him, "My Lord and my God!" Jesus did not rebuke him.
(John 1:1)
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
(John i:2)
The same was in the beginning with God.
(John 1:14)
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
I understand what the NT says about it. But there is nothing in the OT which would leave one to believe that the particular individual who was called Jesus was the person about whom the prophesies were written.
In fact, we don't believe he fulfills the prophesies.
So using your book to somehow substantiate something that ostensibly was in the OT isn't really that helpful. It's kind of like trying to prove your own statement ... with your own statement.
just for the heck of it, i'd also like to point out that the o/p isn't quite correct. allah is more closely related to elohim in hebrew... both mean G-d.... not 'father'.
That is like saying that the only good Christians are those who reject the 10 Commandments.Yes there are "good" muslims, but those people REJECT SHARIAH
If you want to split hairs, which I see you do, Ishmael's father was not Abraham, but Abram. I often wonder... Why did God change his name? Could it be that he was made a new creation in God's eyes? Could it just be cosmetic? Has God EVER done anything cosmetic only?Actually, the Covenant was with Abraham.Okay, I misremembered something, for God did bless Ishmael. That said, the covenant is still with Issac, not Ishmael. And that does not make YWHW the same as Allah.The Torah does Not say that God rejected Ishmael.
In fact, it says the God blessed Ishmael and made him the Father of a great nation.
If you want to split hairs, which I see you do, Ishmael's father was not Abraham, but Abram. I often wonder... Why did God change his name? Could it be that he was made a new creation in God's eyes? Could it just be cosmetic? Has God EVER done anything cosmetic only?Actually, the Covenant was with Abraham.Okay, I misremembered something, for God did bless Ishmael. That said, the covenant is still with Issac, not Ishmael. And that does not make YWHW the same as Allah.
So if you want to split hairs, here's another slice for you to consider. And thanks to Roudy for reminding me to find why I thought Ishamel was rejected a la earlier passages of Genesis.
Ishmael was neither rejected or estranged from his father Abraham or his brother Isaac.
Still doesn't make Allah the same as YHWY.Genesis 25:8 Abraham breathed his last and died in a ripe old age, an old man and satisfied with life; and he was gathered to his people.
25:9 Then his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah, in the field of Ephron the son of Zohar the Hittite, facing Mamre,
(Isaiah 7:14)Do you want to bet?
(John 5:46)
If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me.
(John 14:9)
"Dont you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father."
(John 20:28)
Thomas said to him, "My Lord and my God!" Jesus did not rebuke him.
(John 1:1)
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
(John i:2)
The same was in the beginning with God.
(John 1:14)
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
I understand what the NT says about it. But there is nothing in the OT which would leave one to believe that the particular individual who was called Jesus was the person about whom the prophesies were written.
In fact, we don't believe he fulfills the prophesies.
So using your book to somehow substantiate something that ostensibly was in the OT isn't really that helpful. It's kind of like trying to prove your own statement ... with your own statement.
just for the heck of it, i'd also like to point out that the o/p isn't quite correct. allah is more closely related to elohim in hebrew... both mean G-d.... not 'father'.
If you want to split hairs, which I see you do, Ishmael's father was not Abraham, but Abram. I often wonder... Why did God change his name? Could it be that he was made a new creation in God's eyes? Could it just be cosmetic? Has God EVER done anything cosmetic only?Actually, the Covenant was with Abraham.Okay, I misremembered something, for God did bless Ishmael. That said, the covenant is still with Issac, not Ishmael. And that does not make YWHW the same as Allah.
So if you want to split hairs, here's another slice for you to consider. And thanks to Roudy for reminding me to find why I thought Ishamel was rejected a la earlier passages of Genesis.
If you want to split hairs, which I see you do, Ishmael's father was not Abraham, but Abram. I often wonder... Why did God change his name? Could it be that he was made a new creation in God's eyes? Could it just be cosmetic? Has God EVER done anything cosmetic only?Actually, the Covenant was with Abraham.Okay, I misremembered something, for God did bless Ishmael. That said, the covenant is still with Issac, not Ishmael. And that does not make YWHW the same as Allah.
So if you want to split hairs, here's another slice for you to consider. And thanks to Roudy for reminding me to find why I thought Ishamel was rejected a la earlier passages of Genesis.
If you want to split hairs, which I see you do, Ishmael's father was not Abraham, but Abram. I often wonder... Why did God change his name? Could it be that he was made a new creation in God's eyes? Could it just be cosmetic? Has God EVER done anything cosmetic only?Actually, the Covenant was with Abraham.
So if you want to split hairs, here's another slice for you to consider. And thanks to Roudy for reminding me to find why I thought Ishamel was rejected a la earlier passages of Genesis.
his name was changed from Abram, for 'exaulted father', to Abraham 'father of many' and Sarai's name was changed to sarah... 'my princess' to 'princess'.
According to Levitical Law the first born son gets double the blessing and inheritance.
Must be why the descendants of Ishmael have all of the oil.
And the descendants of Isaac have zip.
According to Levitical Law the first born son gets double the blessing and inheritance.
Must be why the descendants of Ishmael have all of the oil.
And the descendants of Isaac have zip.
If you want to split hairs, which I see you do, Ishmael's father was not Abraham, but Abram. I often wonder... Why did God change his name? Could it be that he was made a new creation in God's eyes? Could it just be cosmetic? Has God EVER done anything cosmetic only?
So if you want to split hairs, here's another slice for you to consider. And thanks to Roudy for reminding me to find why I thought Ishamel was rejected a la earlier passages of Genesis.
his name was changed from Abram, for 'exaulted father', to Abraham 'father of many' and Sarai's name was changed to sarah... 'my princess' to 'princess'.
When Sarai conceived her name wasn't changed just as with Abram.
When Abram was 100 and Sarai 90, G-d promised Abram a son by Sarai. G-d changed Abram's name to Abraham (father of many), and Sarai's to Sarah (from "my princess" to "princess"). Sarah bore Abraham a son, Isaac (in Hebrew, Yitzchak), a name derived from the word "laughter," expressing Abraham's joy at having a son in his old age. (Gen 17-18)
I agree, the Jews are very hard to get along with.According to Levitical Law the first born son gets double the blessing and inheritance.
Must be why the descendants of Ishmael have all of the oil.
And the descendants of Isaac have zip.
the children of ishmael have spent their lives suffering from the worst case of sibling rivalry in history.
According to Levitical Law the first born son gets double the blessing and inheritance.
Must be why the descendants of Ishmael have all of the oil.
And the descendants of Isaac have zip.
You really want to lie don't you?
his name was changed from Abram, for 'exaulted father', to Abraham 'father of many' and Sarai's name was changed to sarah... 'my princess' to 'princess'.
When Sarai conceived her name wasn't changed just as with Abram.
When Abram was 100 and Sarai 90, G-d promised Abram a son by Sarai. G-d changed Abram's name to Abraham (father of many), and Sarai's to Sarah (from "my princess" to "princess"). Sarah bore Abraham a son, Isaac (in Hebrew, Yitzchak), a name derived from the word "laughter," expressing Abraham's joy at having a son in his old age. (Gen 17-18)
Abraham