How is Hillary not as bad
g5000
1. Why does someone always feel the need to post a tu quoque fallacy about Clinton in every Trump topic? Are you retarded enough to think this diminishes Trump's filthiness?
2. Why does someone always assume a person who hates Trump supports Clinton? I detest Clinton. Always have, always will. I've hated the Clintons long, long before Trump decided to change his party affiliation to Republican and prey on the rubes on the Right.
Stop wasting time talking about Clinton in a topic about Trump,.
Trump is a piece of shit. A predator of the elderly and the stupid. He is a sickening character. And I will hate to the end of time him and the retards, hypocrites, bigots, liars, and hypocrites who have hijacked my party and destroyed the Republican and conservative brands.
The problem is, a new president will be elected in November and it will be Trump or Hillary. They will get 3 or 4 Supreme Court picks. If Hillary gets those picks you can forget seeing Conservatism again in your lifetime. Everything we recognize as our nation will crumble to the ground if we don't get these people out of power.
If by conservativism one means a political and social agenda hostile to the privacy rights of women, hostile to the due process rights of gay Americans, hostile to the Framers’ mandate that church and state remain separate, hostile to necessary, proper, and Constitutional business regulatory measures, and a political dogma that seeks to disadvantage transgender Americans through force of law, then good riddance to that manifestation of conservatism.
Dear
C_Clayton_Jones
Let's compare your list of weaknesses and faults to correct among the right
with the equivalent of what can be improved on the left. Is that fair?
EX:
A1. "Constitutional business regulatory measures rejected by the right"
A2. Constitutional regulations on voting and fraud prevention rejected by the left
How about going for a consensus on well-written laws both sides agree are fair and
which DON'T impose or create burdens and other unintended/negative consequences?
B1. "mandate that church and state remain separate"
B2. "equal and consistent enforcement"
instead of selective enforcement on what creeds, beliefs, or policies are endorsed by the left and the govt,
and which are rejected as "separation of church and state"
[ie I think BOTH parties need a serious check on what are political beliefs the other party rejects as a creed]
C1. privacy rights of women / due process of gay Americans [instead of imposing Christian/antigay biases]
C2. free choice of all Americans in health care policies / due process of Christians [instead of
imposing antiChristian/progay biases through govt or schools]
C3. disadvantaging EITHER the beliefs about transgender orientation, for or against or neutral,
by imposing bans that go too far either in one direction or the other, excluding beliefs of objectors.