- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,206
- 9,180
- 2,030
Again and again, users come to this thread and – without reading its first post – allege that Ukrainian laws are normal and that there are such laws in every country (see the post of user frigidweirdo below).
But when I ask these users whether they know, for example, any US laws, which divide US citizens according to their ethnic origin into categories, some of which have more rights and others have less rights, these users ignore my question.
Please read the first post of this thread before making such “smart” statements.
Problem is you even said yourself in one OP that the Ukrainian constitution says everyone is equal.
Then you say something about: "These laws provide that only Ukrainians, Crimean Tatars and two other small Crimean Turkic peoples have the right to be taught in Ukraine with use of their native languages in all grades of secondary school."
"The law defines indigenous people, fixes which peoples are recognised as indigenous and what benefits they receive in the cultural, educational, informational and political spheres."
Does America have this? Yes.
Native Americans can have their reservations which have different laws. They can have casinos.
"It should be said at the outset that the Ukrainian legislator took the text of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as a basis. "
Yeah, they took this text from the UN, so not only is the US a nazi state, but the UN is a nazi body too.
Rights of indigenous peoples in Russian law
Article on human rights of indigenous peoples in Russia
www.umu.se
"In Russia, there exist legal norms providing for the protection of indigenous small-numbered peoples’ rights."
Uh oh, even in Russia they have such laws.
So Russia is fighting to de-Nazify the Ukraine while, according to your flawed logic, it is a nazi state itself.