Even if there is a spiritual connection, it causes thinking in humanity we don't see anywhere else. Therefore, that would be 'special thinking' in this context.
Well now you're being totally ridiculous. Spirituality caused special thinking that enables us to think up Spirituality??? A bit of circular logic there.
I do agree, our human spiritual connection does cause us to think differently, spawning all kinds of other attributes not found in other species. The argument is over whether the connection is real or false, and I maintain it must be real. A false connection would not have yielded these results and humans would have abandoned spirituality if there were nothing to it. From a totally rational perspective, one must consider either mankind believes they are making a spiritual connection, or they actually are making one.
If it takes 'real fucking moronic idiots to imagine something that isn't there in order to console fear and the unknown, and then do that their entire existence', and you don't believe that any religions are correct, then you are saying that is exactly what humanity has done, at the same time you say you don't believe they have done it. Perhaps the religions were created to try and explain spiritual connection, but they would still be made up.
Well no... Religions are based on something real, a spiritual connection. They are our way of trying to comprehend that connection. We didn't make up the spiritual connection and then create all these religions to comprehend what we made up for all of our existence, believing that it gave us great benefits and warded off dangers, console fears, etc. That just makes no sense whatsoever.
Language is a form of communication. We observe animals communicating all the time, some have 'languages' and some don't. The reason we have very complex ideas that need exchanging is because we are spiritually inspired creatures. This is what other animals lack that we have.
I'm just making the point that other animals have knowledge of things we don't have. Perhaps it is through better senses or instincts? Our capabilities are exemplary because we are spiritually connected creatures. We have a source of power to draw from that other animals don't have.
Stands to reason if inventing imaginary playmates to ward off fears or console in the unknown works for humans, that other animals would do it. Maybe not to the same degree, but at least to some degree, one example in a billion or something. The thing is, this meme has no basis of support in anything we've observed in nature. Other animals don't grapple with mortality or fear the unknown. They certainly don't create fake placebos and adopt meaningless rituals to console themselves, and then do that for all their existence even though there is no real benefit.
And all of those things come through our spiritual inspiration as spiritually connected creatures. We obviously didn't gain these attributes through evolution or we'd see signs of it in our common ancestors.
I've not said any religion is "false". I have said they are flawed because they were created by man and man is flawed.
You post as though fear of death, questions about the possibility of the afterlife, the creation of the universe and life, etc. are either already answered or not important enough for people to search out answers and comfort about. Are you serious? You say god did it isn't an answer....yet people have been satisfied with that as an answer to numerous questions throughout human history.
Well, no they haven't been satisfied with that. They created Science! They've also created new religions and modified old ones. My point was that no other species is concerned with mortality or afterlife, they aren't spiritually aware of anything beyond the physical. We have these 'important' questions because we are aware, we are spiritually connected to something greater than self.
Clearly, what you consider inadequate most people have disagreed with you on. On this issue you appear to be in agreement with the atheists and agnostics of the world.
The point about conclusive evidence doesn't elude me. You are the one who continues to make statements as though they are obvious facts without providing any real evidence of them. That's pretty much the theme of this entire thread.
I don't care who disagrees with me. Some people do. They live for acceptance and being liked by others. For me, I couldn't care less. Now I think I have supported all of my viewpoints with compelling arguments, whether you acknowledge my evidence or not, is really irrelevant to me. I've shot down the various memes to explain away spirituality in humans and destroyed those arguments. I can't prove anything to you, and I'm probably never going to change your mind, but I bet I've made you think. That's all I'm really after here.
You said humans would have abandoned spirituality if there were nothing to it. A. Not necessarily and B. Who says we arent moving that way?
You then said we didn't make up the spiritual connection and then create all these religions to comprehend what we made up for all of our existence. Yes we did.
You said the reason we have very complex ideas that need exchanging is because we are spiritually inspired creatures. Not a fact.
Our capabilities are exemplary because we are spiritually connected creatures. Another thing you say as fact that isnt fact.
No other animals has a brain big/smart enough to have an imagination or come up with the concept of god. That doesnt make god real or men smart. It just makes us the smartest animal on this planet capable of imagination. What other animals sit around and imagine fairy tales? A lot of your conclusions are incorrect. Youve also said you experienced god. Science has explained that too. Every human-being ever born begins life as an implicit atheist and must be taught the concept of theism or, more commonly, indoctrinated with it. Actually, that isnt 100% true because if man made up god thousands of years ago we could presumably make it up again. But without the thousands of years of brainwashing weve gotten from the god believers and with the science we have today, I doubt the concept would catch on today like it did back then. No one is killing you for doubting today. And if you did make it up today, you wouldn't have come up with the noah, adam and eve, moses stories unless either someone told you those stories and you believed them or if god himself told you. Today we rely on our churches and parents to brainwash us with religion. Even if you one day wise up and doubt christianity, you are the perfect example of someone who believes despite all the facts.
Here is science telling you your hunch is wrong: Morality is a cultural concept with a basis in evolutionary psychology and game theory. Species whose members were predisposed to cooperate were more likely to survive and pass on their genes. Reciprocacy, altruism and other so-called moral characteristics are evident in many species. The neurochemical thought to regulate morality and empathy is oxytocin. Religious texts are simply part of many early attempts to codify moral precepts. Secular law, flexible with the shifting moral zeitgeist, has long since superseded religion as a source of moral directives for the majority of developed societies. Secular ethics offers a number of competing moral frameworks which do not derive from a purported supernatural source.
Question? How did Buddhists come up with the concept that there is no god? If they came up with it it must be true, just like you say god is true because we instinctively invented one. Nontheism plays a significant roles in Buddhism and Hinduism. While many approaches to religion exclude nontheism by definition, there are some inclusive definitions that show how religious practice and belief do not depend on the presence of god(s). For example: "religion can be defined as a relatively-bounded system of beliefs, symbols and practices that addresses the nature of existence, and in which communion with others and Otherness is lived as if it both takes in and spiritually transcends socially-grounded ontologies of time, space, embodiment and knowing".