You haven't heard about abolition? Know any slaves, do ya? Get this weak sauce out of here. Nowhere is it germane to my point that everyone follow the superior codes of morality we formed quite in spite of the primitive, immoral iron age mythology. Bubt clearly most of our society does. As opposed to the societies based on the gross iron age handbook.
May want to take a look at what ancient Greeks thought about sexuality. Some early Hebrews had a different take. We see the same differences in today's cultures. What I would find interesting is why some feel everyone today ought to agree on the issue when clearly not everyone in ancient times agreed.
Ever research true stories about sex slaves? They are not that difficult to find.
And you may want to pick up a history book. You embarrass yourself not to acknowledge the progress out species has made. But doing so would be to admit your primitive handbook isn't infallible. So you can't. There is no mystery here.
Ever see it codified into law that any black person can be owned?
There is nothing to run from. You can sprinkle that horseshit on anything gorgeous nothing at all. It won't affect me or anything thing at all. It explains nothing and yields no useful predictions. So knock yourself out.
Here is the problem, Fort. I am not talking about the Bible. I am talking about written material outside the Bible. You happened to find ancient writings with which you do not agree. Your assumption is that if not for this one ancient book, everyone would agree with you. You are giving more power to the book than I am.
Well let's clarify:
Then thank goodness for atheists. Its appears I owe them a lot. I take it, you, too, are from a family of atheists?
I was just trying to have a discussion, but it sounded like you didn't want to. I understand since science does not back up abiogenesis. Evolution doesn't have any observable evidence. Atheists can still have their religion even if there is no science to back it up.How's this. If you think you have a point, try making it.. i.e. backing it up with verifiable facts.. links to nonfictional sources may help..
Lol what?
Remind me, how many millions of years did old Louie run that experiment again? Ranges of temperature? Pressure? Humidity? Oxygen? Carbon dioxide? Nitrogen? Science just implies study, not proving or "disproving" things. Pasteur's cheap attempt to produce life from muck clearly failed, that's all.
www.nature.com
hardly it's changed quite a lot.
Lol-lol-lol-wut? You don't have Louis Pasteur's credentials and ingenuity, know when he did the experiment, nor understand the scientific method. Anyone can repeat the experiment to see for themselves. Besides, you do not have any scientific evidence nor a link to back up your wild and foolish opinions and claims. I gave you what you asked for and made my point. How can evolution ever start by itself with no abiogenesis? Atheists can't provide any observable evidence for evolution.
I love you too, Dear. Okay, back to ignore with you..
I get the last word then. It shows I won everything and you lost everything. The Bible states that the atheists and sinners will see the believers in heaven while they are in hell. Those who have gone to heaven will not be able to see hell. That is God's infinite wisdom at work.
