"We have to increase taxes on the wealthy"

Whoa. Holy crap. I'm not surprised by much any more, but this made me do a double-take. STEVE BANNON said this.

“I’m for a dramatic increase in corporate taxes. We have to increase taxes on the wealthy. For getting our guys’s taxes cut, we’ve got to cut spending, which they’re gonna resist. Where does the tax revenue come from? Corporations and the wealthy,” Bannon said during an interview with Semafor that was published Friday.

“And when they start squealing, we have a conversation,” the conservative media personality added. “We’re all partners in this, everybody’s going to take a little pain, but the working people are going to take less pain than you guys.”

On the campaign trail, Trump, Bannon’s former boss, said he wants to extend many provisions in his 2017 tax legislation, his signature economic achievement during his first White House term. He also vowed to slash taxes on tips and Social Security. Trump has also shown support for dropping the corporate income tax rate to 15 percent.


Personally, I'm for adding perhaps four new higher brackets on the top end. So yeah, I agree. On corporate taxes, we need to be careful and remain competitive globally, but I'm for establishing a Minimum Effective Tax Rate of maybe 10%, so that we don't have huge companies paying zero, like Amazon.

Thoughts?

Steve Bannon supports increasing taxes on the wealthy

Changed the guy his political affiliation, is he a commie now?
 
This is the problem when your government continues to over spend and few GOP even have the courage to say no, or why, how . You think you can just raise the money through tariffs alone? Good luck raising $2T a year through tariffs. This over spending will sink Trumps second term I'm afraid.
The purpose of the so-called Sixteenth Amendment was to soak the rich - it failed
The rich are Americans just as we are - no reason for them to pay more
After the disastrous destructive AMerica Last BuyThem administration we must be careful about defining overspending
 
Whoa. Holy crap. I'm not surprised by much any more, but this made me do a double-take. STEVE BANNON said this.

“I’m for a dramatic increase in corporate taxes. We have to increase taxes on the wealthy. For getting our guys’s taxes cut, we’ve got to cut spending, which they’re gonna resist. Where does the tax revenue come from? Corporations and the wealthy,” Bannon said during an interview with Semafor that was published Friday.

“And when they start squealing, we have a conversation,” the conservative media personality added. “We’re all partners in this, everybody’s going to take a little pain, but the working people are going to take less pain than you guys.”

On the campaign trail, Trump, Bannon’s former boss, said he wants to extend many provisions in his 2017 tax legislation, his signature economic achievement during his first White House term. He also vowed to slash taxes on tips and Social Security. Trump has also shown support for dropping the corporate income tax rate to 15 percent.


Personally, I'm for adding perhaps four new higher brackets on the top end. So yeah, I agree. On corporate taxes, we need to be careful and remain competitive globally, but I'm for establishing a Minimum Effective Tax Rate of maybe 10%, so that we don't have huge companies paying zero, like Amazon.

Thoughts?

Steve Bannon supports increasing taxes on the wealthy
So Steve Bannon discovered basic arithmetic.

Good for him.
 
Whoa. Holy crap. I'm not surprised by much any more, but this made me do a double-take. STEVE BANNON said this.

“I’m for a dramatic increase in corporate taxes. We have to increase taxes on the wealthy. For getting our guys’s taxes cut, we’ve got to cut spending, which they’re gonna resist. Where does the tax revenue come from? Corporations and the wealthy,” Bannon said during an interview with Semafor that was published Friday.

“And when they start squealing, we have a conversation,” the conservative media personality added. “We’re all partners in this, everybody’s going to take a little pain, but the working people are going to take less pain than you guys.”

On the campaign trail, Trump, Bannon’s former boss, said he wants to extend many provisions in his 2017 tax legislation, his signature economic achievement during his first White House term. He also vowed to slash taxes on tips and Social Security. Trump has also shown support for dropping the corporate income tax rate to 15 percent.


Personally, I'm for adding perhaps four new higher brackets on the top end. So yeah, I agree. On corporate taxes, we need to be careful and remain competitive globally, but I'm for establishing a Minimum Effective Tax Rate of maybe 10%, so that we don't have huge companies paying zero, like Amazon.

Thoughts?

Steve Bannon supports increasing taxes on the wealthy
Question - How much tax has Musk paid?

Don't answer with a question, don't get a lackey to reply, how much tax has Musk paid?

How about, the less you earn, the greater the tax bracket. Just to get the lazy off their backsides!!
 
The middle classes terminate after this year, bub.
Weird how the Dimwingers did nothing about that when they controlled everything, huh?

At least you admit you lied about it just being a tax cut for the rich.
 
Weird how the Dimwingers did nothing about that when they controlled everything, huh?

At least you admit you lied about it just being a tax cut for the rich.
You tell a lie. I never said it was just for the rich. I said it was forever in time for the rich. You were trying to hide that it was temporary for the working class, so again like so many times before, I outed your deceit.
 
This is the problem when your government continues to over spend and few GOP even have the courage to say no, or why, how . You think you can just raise the money through tariffs alone? Good luck raising $2T a year through tariffs. This over spending will sink Trumps second term I'm afraid.
It`s impossible to make serious spending cuts as long as cutting the world`s largest welfare program is off limits. Yes, that`s our Pentagon. I don`t think we`ll be attacked by Canada or Mexico and the coasts have large bodies of water protecting us.
 
You tell a lie. I never said it was just for the rich. I said it was forever in time for the rich. You were trying to hide that it was temporary for the working class, so again like so many times before, I outed your deceit.
Your story is changing, and I tried to hide nothing. I just pointed out the fact the cut was across the board to expose your lie.

As long as Congress terminates the Trump cuts for the rich.
 
Your story is changing, and I tried to hide nothing. I just pointed out the fact the cut was across the board to expose your lie.
No, your story is changing. I caught you yet again.

ps: Nostra ignored that the cut was temporary only for the working classes. He would not tell you that. Caught again.
 
No, your story is changing. I caught you yet again.

ps: Nostra ignored that the cut was temporary only for the working classes. He would not tell you that. Caught again.
Nope. My story is the same, unlike yours, liar.
 
Very goood, boevans. Nostra is a slimy low-intelligence that trips himself continually.

Remember to practice catch-and-release, so we all can have fun.
Feel free to quote my contradictory posts, Simp.

Betcha can’t.
 
Feel free to quote my contradictory posts, Simp.

Betcha can’t.
Your posts are not full and to the point. If you think they are contradictory, then change your behavior, man.

Just man up. You can change for the better.
 
Your posts are not full and to the point. If you think they are contradictory, then change your behavior, man.

Just man up. You can change for the better.
Not full and to the point? Funny shit coming from the lying vermin who claimed it was only a tax cut for the rich.

My post was full and to the point. It exposed your lie.
 
Not full and to the point? Funny shit coming from the lying vermin who claimed it was only a tax cut for the rich.

My post was full and to the point. It exposed your lie.
Now you are lying, and you know it. You are looking stupid again. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Back
Top Bottom