Wanna know why the Iranian missiles didn't work against our base in Iraq?

Nostra

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2019
62,632
53,757
3,615
This is our "low tech" way of taking out incoming missiles.

IIRC, the tracers you see are every 5th projectile or so.

 
I trained on one of those when I was in the Army.

It was called the M61 Vulcan weapon system.

6 barrel 20mm electric rotary cannon mounted on top of an APC

3,000 High Explosive rounds a minute.

Every 10th round was a tracer. ... :salute:

Looks like the Sea Whiz. Same thing?
 
Looks like Star Wars!

Crazy & Amazing at the same time.


Russia must be pissed right now, and Iran is probably pissed too! They had the best cruise missile (Obama Bombs) Obama Bucks could buy from Russia and not one hit their target.


This is our "low tech" way of taking out incoming missiles.

IIRC, the tracers you see are every 5th projectile or so.

 
It didn't work, as there was quite a bit of damage done to some of the targets that would have killed some servicemen if they hadn't had a heads up they were incoming.
 
It didn't work, as there was quite a bit of damage done to some of the targets that would have killed some servicemen if they hadn't had a heads up they were incoming.
Direct hits on US barracks. That tells us something about the accuracy of Iranian missiles.

However, the US has the ability to detect ballistic missile launches, so the troops had time to disperse.

Many speculated that the Iranians may have missed on purpose when it was reported that there were no casualties. The damage assessments should put that theory to rest.

 
Last edited:
It didn't work, as there was quite a bit of damage done to some of the targets that would have killed some servicemen if they hadn't had a heads up they were incoming.
Did you miss how many were taken out?

Fucking idiot.
 
It didn't work, as there was quite a bit of damage done to some of the targets that would have killed some servicemen if they hadn't had a heads up they were incoming.
Direct hits on US barracks. That tells us something about the accuracy of Iranian missiles.

However, the US has the ability to detect ballistic missile launches, so the troops had time to disperse.

Many speculated that the Iranians may have missed on purpose when it was reported that there were no casualties. The damage assessments should put that theory to rest.



Doesn't it make you wonder if Iran had not told the U.S. where they were aiming in order to give the U.S. a chance to get everyone out of harm's way... in order to allow the Iranian leaders to save face?
 
It didn't work, as there was quite a bit of damage done to some of the targets that would have killed some servicemen if they hadn't had a heads up they were incoming.
Direct hits on US barracks. That tells us something about the accuracy of Iranian missiles.

However, the US has the ability to detect ballistic missile launches, so the troops had time to disperse.

Many speculated that the Iranians may have missed on purpose when it was reported that there were no casualties. The damage assessments should put that theory to rest.



Doesn't it make you wonder if Iran had not told the U.S. where they were aiming in order to give the U.S. a chance to get everyone out of harm's way... in order to allow the Iranian leaders to save face?

Exactly.

The Mullahs learned Trump isn't their bitch like Barry Hussein. Trump lit up their head Terrorist, and the Mullahs shit their robes.
 
It didn't work, as there was quite a bit of damage done to some of the targets that would have killed some servicemen if they hadn't had a heads up they were incoming.
Did you miss how many were taken out?

Fucking idiot.

It doesn't matter how many were taken out... because it wouldn't have stopped casualties had the soldiers not had enough time to seek shelter. You are about is ignorant as the guy that thought the DOW should have gone up 22,000 points under Obama.
 

Forum List

Back
Top