Trump has slight lead in 2 swing states

This poll disputes the last three national polls in which Clinton has at least a two-point lead in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, according to Politico.

But subsequent polls later confirmed the May Quinnipiac surveys: Trump pulled virtually even with Clinton nationally after knocking out his rivals for the GOP nomination.

[…]

But, in a reversal from earlier surveys, it’s a more acute problem for Clinton. Clinton’s unfavorable ratings (59 percent in Florida, 60 percent in Ohio, 65 percent in Pennsylvania) are higher than Trump’s (54 percent in Florida, 59 percent in Ohio, 57 percent in Pennsylvania) in all three battleground states. And majorities in all three states–which together account for 67 electoral votes, or nearly a quarter of the 270 necessary to win the presidency–have a “very unfavorable” view of Clinton.

The Quinnipiac poll shows a drop for Clinton in “moral standards” for voters in the state of Florida. Politico pointed out:

In the poll release, the school suggested the investigation could have played a role, pointing to other lingering questions about Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness. “While there is no definite link between Clinton’s drop in Florida and the U.S. Justice Department decision not to prosecute her for her handling of emails,” Quinnipiac pollster Peter Brown said, “she has lost ground to Trump on questions which measure moral standards and honesty.”

The Quinnipiac poll found the following on this:

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 42-42 percent tie on who has higher moral standards, wiping out a 47-36 percent Clinton lead on this measure June 21.

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 50-37 percent that Trump is more honest and trustworthy, up from 43-40 percent.

In all three swing states, Trump has at least a ten point lead over Clinton when voters are asked who is more honest and trustworthy.

Trump also has a seven point lead over Clinton with voters when they are asked to say who is a stronger leader.

A new McClatchy national poll also shows a tightening race. Clinton, in a one-on-one matchup with Trump, is just up three points, 42 percent to 39 percent. It was the first time Clinton dropped below 50 percent support in polls going back one year.
 
This poll disputes the last three national polls in which Clinton has at least a two-point lead in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, according to Politico.

But subsequent polls later confirmed the May Quinnipiac surveys: Trump pulled virtually even with Clinton nationally after knocking out his rivals for the GOP nomination.

[…]

But, in a reversal from earlier surveys, it’s a more acute problem for Clinton. Clinton’s unfavorable ratings (59 percent in Florida, 60 percent in Ohio, 65 percent in Pennsylvania) are higher than Trump’s (54 percent in Florida, 59 percent in Ohio, 57 percent in Pennsylvania) in all three battleground states. And majorities in all three states–which together account for 67 electoral votes, or nearly a quarter of the 270 necessary to win the presidency–have a “very unfavorable” view of Clinton.

The Quinnipiac poll shows a drop for Clinton in “moral standards” for voters in the state of Florida. Politico pointed out:

In the poll release, the school suggested the investigation could have played a role, pointing to other lingering questions about Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness. “While there is no definite link between Clinton’s drop in Florida and the U.S. Justice Department decision not to prosecute her for her handling of emails,” Quinnipiac pollster Peter Brown said, “she has lost ground to Trump on questions which measure moral standards and honesty.”

The Quinnipiac poll found the following on this:

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 42-42 percent tie on who has higher moral standards, wiping out a 47-36 percent Clinton lead on this measure June 21.

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 50-37 percent that Trump is more honest and trustworthy, up from 43-40 percent.

In all three swing states, Trump has at least a ten point lead over Clinton when voters are asked who is more honest and trustworthy.

Trump also has a seven point lead over Clinton with voters when they are asked to say who is a stronger leader.

A new McClatchy national poll also shows a tightening race. Clinton, in a one-on-one matchup with Trump, is just up three points, 42 percent to 39 percent. It was the first time Clinton dropped below 50 percent support in polls going back one year.

The plot thickens
 
This poll disputes the last three national polls in which Clinton has at least a two-point lead in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, according to Politico.

But subsequent polls later confirmed the May Quinnipiac surveys: Trump pulled virtually even with Clinton nationally after knocking out his rivals for the GOP nomination.

[…]

But, in a reversal from earlier surveys, it’s a more acute problem for Clinton. Clinton’s unfavorable ratings (59 percent in Florida, 60 percent in Ohio, 65 percent in Pennsylvania) are higher than Trump’s (54 percent in Florida, 59 percent in Ohio, 57 percent in Pennsylvania) in all three battleground states. And majorities in all three states–which together account for 67 electoral votes, or nearly a quarter of the 270 necessary to win the presidency–have a “very unfavorable” view of Clinton.

The Quinnipiac poll shows a drop for Clinton in “moral standards” for voters in the state of Florida. Politico pointed out:

In the poll release, the school suggested the investigation could have played a role, pointing to other lingering questions about Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness. “While there is no definite link between Clinton’s drop in Florida and the U.S. Justice Department decision not to prosecute her for her handling of emails,” Quinnipiac pollster Peter Brown said, “she has lost ground to Trump on questions which measure moral standards and honesty.”

The Quinnipiac poll found the following on this:

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 42-42 percent tie on who has higher moral standards, wiping out a 47-36 percent Clinton lead on this measure June 21.

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 50-37 percent that Trump is more honest and trustworthy, up from 43-40 percent.

In all three swing states, Trump has at least a ten point lead over Clinton when voters are asked who is more honest and trustworthy.

Trump also has a seven point lead over Clinton with voters when they are asked to say who is a stronger leader.

A new McClatchy national poll also shows a tightening race. Clinton, in a one-on-one matchup with Trump, is just up three points, 42 percent to 39 percent. It was the first time Clinton dropped below 50 percent support in polls going back one year.

The plot thickens

if you used corn starch----toss a little vinegar in and
it will loosen up (I think---I am not sure)
 
This poll disputes the last three national polls in which Clinton has at least a two-point lead in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, according to Politico.

But subsequent polls later confirmed the May Quinnipiac surveys: Trump pulled virtually even with Clinton nationally after knocking out his rivals for the GOP nomination.

[…]

But, in a reversal from earlier surveys, it’s a more acute problem for Clinton. Clinton’s unfavorable ratings (59 percent in Florida, 60 percent in Ohio, 65 percent in Pennsylvania) are higher than Trump’s (54 percent in Florida, 59 percent in Ohio, 57 percent in Pennsylvania) in all three battleground states. And majorities in all three states–which together account for 67 electoral votes, or nearly a quarter of the 270 necessary to win the presidency–have a “very unfavorable” view of Clinton.

The Quinnipiac poll shows a drop for Clinton in “moral standards” for voters in the state of Florida. Politico pointed out:

In the poll release, the school suggested the investigation could have played a role, pointing to other lingering questions about Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness. “While there is no definite link between Clinton’s drop in Florida and the U.S. Justice Department decision not to prosecute her for her handling of emails,” Quinnipiac pollster Peter Brown said, “she has lost ground to Trump on questions which measure moral standards and honesty.”

The Quinnipiac poll found the following on this:

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 42-42 percent tie on who has higher moral standards, wiping out a 47-36 percent Clinton lead on this measure June 21.

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 50-37 percent that Trump is more honest and trustworthy, up from 43-40 percent.

In all three swing states, Trump has at least a ten point lead over Clinton when voters are asked who is more honest and trustworthy.

Trump also has a seven point lead over Clinton with voters when they are asked to say who is a stronger leader.

A new McClatchy national poll also shows a tightening race. Clinton, in a one-on-one matchup with Trump, is just up three points, 42 percent to 39 percent. It was the first time Clinton dropped below 50 percent support in polls going back one year.

The plot thickens

if you used corn starch----toss a little vinegar in and
it will loosen up (I think---I am not sure)

The emails were a slurry. (-:
 
This poll disputes the last three national polls in which Clinton has at least a two-point lead in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, according to Politico.

But subsequent polls later confirmed the May Quinnipiac surveys: Trump pulled virtually even with Clinton nationally after knocking out his rivals for the GOP nomination.

[…]

But, in a reversal from earlier surveys, it’s a more acute problem for Clinton. Clinton’s unfavorable ratings (59 percent in Florida, 60 percent in Ohio, 65 percent in Pennsylvania) are higher than Trump’s (54 percent in Florida, 59 percent in Ohio, 57 percent in Pennsylvania) in all three battleground states. And majorities in all three states–which together account for 67 electoral votes, or nearly a quarter of the 270 necessary to win the presidency–have a “very unfavorable” view of Clinton.

The Quinnipiac poll shows a drop for Clinton in “moral standards” for voters in the state of Florida. Politico pointed out:

In the poll release, the school suggested the investigation could have played a role, pointing to other lingering questions about Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness. “While there is no definite link between Clinton’s drop in Florida and the U.S. Justice Department decision not to prosecute her for her handling of emails,” Quinnipiac pollster Peter Brown said, “she has lost ground to Trump on questions which measure moral standards and honesty.”

The Quinnipiac poll found the following on this:

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 42-42 percent tie on who has higher moral standards, wiping out a 47-36 percent Clinton lead on this measure June 21.

Comparing the candidates’ character traits, voters say: 50-37 percent that Trump is more honest and trustworthy, up from 43-40 percent.

In all three swing states, Trump has at least a ten point lead over Clinton when voters are asked who is more honest and trustworthy.

Trump also has a seven point lead over Clinton with voters when they are asked to say who is a stronger leader.

A new McClatchy national poll also shows a tightening race. Clinton, in a one-on-one matchup with Trump, is just up three points, 42 percent to 39 percent. It was the first time Clinton dropped below 50 percent support in polls going back one year.

The plot thickens

if you used corn starch----toss a little vinegar in and
it will loosen up (I think---I am not sure)

The emails were a slurry. (-:

so true----but you never know what a slurry will do until it
HITS THE POT AND HEATS UP
 
I believe many of her beliefs cause the furor-

Ruth Bader Ginsburg To Egypt: Don't Use US Constitution As A Model | RealClearPolitics


and her belief in population control of ,'the undesirable '.
-
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.”

Ginsburg is correct in noting that concerns about population growth animated many of those who backed Roe v. Wade. For instance, Sarah Weddington, co-counsel in Roe, along with her then-husband, Ron, wrote in her book A Question of Choice that team Weddington submitted as evidence the controversial 1972 Rockefeller Commission Report on Population Growth and the American Future, which included a call for public funding of abortion.

As for Ron Weddington, his views are even more direct, as was evident in a January 1993 letter to President-elect Bill Clinton. Weddington advised Clinton to strive “immediately to eliminate the barely educated, unhealthy, and poor segment of our country.”

How did Weddington propose to implement this draconian suggestion? In his letter to Clinton, he candidly wrote, “[G]overnment is going to have to provide vasectomies, tubal ligations and abortions … RU486 and conventional abortions.”

Weddington ended his letter with more words of sympathy for the poor: “We don’t need more cannon fodder. We don’t need more parishioners. We don’t need more cheap labor. We don’t need more poor babies.”

A year later it was Clinton who appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court. For Ginsburg, that path was paved with help from one of the Weddingtons. As Sarah Weddington said in a 2007 interview, “I’ve also known Ruth Bader Ginsburg for years, and helped her get her appointment.”
Justice Ginsburg’s “Populations we Don’t Want to Have too Many of” | The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College Center for Vision and Values - A conservative think tank promoting truth and liberty through a vision of faith and freedom.





Poll: Trump Has Slight Advantage Over Clinton in Vital Swing States

Interesting to see wonder what happens next week after the Ginsberg attack on trump bc the woman is despised

why is Ginsberg despised?
 
Already rebutted in the other thread on this.

Please merge the threads.
 
Quinnipiac Poll Is Good News For Trump

Looks like Hillary dodging justice with the help of Loretta Lynch and the violent racism of BLM have helped law and order candidate Trump in polls. Keep on marching and screaming BLM...helps Trump.
The left love to point at national polls which are of course relatively pointless as the swing states will determine who the next president is.
 
I'm still trying to get an answer from Trump supporters. What is Trump going to do about the two biggest questions effecting them today; low wages and the economy?
 
Can Hillary carry a tune?
We all know she can bark like a dog.
What tune will she be singing when she becomes a two-time loser?
Trump is shocking a lot of people who claimed he never had a chance. That Hillary would 'annihilate him".
Those fools are hiding under their rocks now.
Trump's poll numbers are growing steadily while Hillary's numbers are sinking.
I predict by Nov. Trump will be ten points up on Hillary.
Swing-state stunner: Trump has edge in key states
 

Forum List

Back
Top