Zone1 THIS, is playing the victim

Status
Not open for further replies.

IM2

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 11, 2015
77,073
34,268
2,330
1690535480491.png

THIS, is playing the victim.

Why do people dislike these men? Is it because they exist?
Or is it their draconian attitudes and beliefs?


“What’s always interesting to me is the degree to which you’ve seen created in Republican politics the sense that white males are victims.”
- Former President Barack Obama

Today, some whites have taken the art of victimization to a new level. Criticism of whites becomes a whining session Paul Masson or Julio Gallo would appreciate. We must understand how complete the madness is.

“Aggrieved whiteness is a white identity politics aimed at maintaining white socio-political hegemony through challenging efforts to combat actual material racial inequality, while supporting heavily racialized investments in policing, prisons, and the military, and positing a narrative of antiwhite racial oppression loosely rooted in an assortment of racialized threats.” -Mike King

Aggrieved whiteness is a trait shown mainly by right-wing white men. They have problems reconciling how people are holding them accountable for the creation and maintenance of a system here in America and most of the world that has benefitted many of them by exploiting others. An example of this is an op-ed written in the July 3, 2017, edition of the Boston Globe titled “In Defense of the White Male” By Roland Merullo. In this article, we see the most common argument used by the white grievance crowd when the topic is racism. Here the author complains about how he thinks white men are mistreated, suggests that white males have done no more or less evil than anyone else, and wonders why in his view, everybody is picking on the poor oppressed white male.

“From Jews to African-Americans to homosexuals to Irish, Italian, and now Middle Eastern immigrants, hatred began by tossing all of them into a group, and attributing to that group the most unattractive characteristics imaginable. What is being done to “white males” now, it should go without saying, is not on a par with what was done to those people. But the instinct to label and blame is born of the same kind of group-think.”
-Roland Merullo

White males tossed all the people he mentioned into those groups and attributed those unattractive labels that many of us still face coming from members of the white male population today. This reality is what men like Marcus and other white men with this mindset willfully ignore. Therefore, they can write such articles and believe they have a legitimate grievance. To them, being held accountable is unfair blame. Yet they can hold anyone they want responsible even if it is made up. Again, this is part of the entitlement mentality that encompasses white male privilege. This kind of amnesia has allowed a part of the white community to embrace a position of white victimhood.

Mike King, Aggrieved Whiteness: White Identity Politics and Modern American Racial Formation, May 4, 2017

Roland Merullo, In Defense of the White Male, Boston Globe, July 3, 2017, In defense of the white male - The Boston Globe
 
Last edited:
There are "victims" of all colors. Pretending one race doesnt get discriminated against, is denying reality and racist, in of itself.
Pretending whites didn't create laws to purposefully deny others and created the animosity others may hold against whites is denying reality.
 
View attachment 808660
THIS, is playing the victim.

Why do people dislike these men? Is it because they exist?
Or is it their draconian attitudes and beliefs?


“What’s always interesting to me is the degree to which you’ve seen created in Republican politics the sense that white males are victims.”
- Former President Barack Obama

Today, some whites have taken the art of victimization to a new level. Criticism of whites becomes a whining session Paul Masson or Julio Gallo would appreciate. We must understand how complete the madness is.

“Aggrieved whiteness is a white identity politics aimed at maintaining white socio-political hegemony through challenging efforts to combat actual material racial inequality, while supporting heavily racialized investments in policing, prisons, and the military, and positing a narrative of antiwhite racial oppression loosely rooted in an assortment of racialized threats.” -Mike King

Aggrieved whiteness is a trait shown mainly by right-wing white men. They have problems reconciling how people are holding them accountable for the creation and maintenance of a system here in America and most of the world that has benefitted many of them by exploiting others. An example of this is an op-ed written in the July 3, 2017, edition of the Boston Globe titled “In Defense of the White Male” By Roland Merullo. In this article, we see the most common argument used by the white grievance crowd when the topic is racism. Here the author complains about how he thinks white men are mistreated, suggests that white males have done no more or less evil than anyone else, and wonders why in his view, everybody is picking on the poor oppressed white male.

“From Jews to African-Americans to homosexuals to Irish, Italian, and now Middle Eastern immigrants, hatred began by tossing all of them into a group, and attributing to that group the most unattractive characteristics imaginable. What is being done to “white males” now, it should go without saying, is not on a par with what was done to those people. But the instinct to label and blame is born of the same kind of group-think.”
-Roland Merullo

White males tossed all the people he mentioned into those groups and attributed those unattractive labels that many of us still face coming from members of the white male population today. This reality is what men like Marcus and other white men with this mindset willfully ignore. Therefore, they can write such articles and believe they have a legitimate grievance. To them, being held accountable is unfair blame. Yet they can hold anyone they want responsible even if it is made up. Again, this is part of the entitlement mentality that encompasses white male privilege. This kind of amnesia has allowed a part of the white community to embrace a position of white victimhood.

Mike King, Aggrieved Whiteness: White Identity Politics and Modern American Racial Formation, May 4, 2017

Roland Merullo, In Defense of the White Male, Boston Globe, July 3, 2017, In defense of the white male - The Boston Globe
BlakApproval.jpg
 
View attachment 808660
THIS, is playing the victim.

Why do people dislike these men? Is it because they exist?
Or is it their draconian attitudes and beliefs?


“What’s always interesting to me is the degree to which you’ve seen created in Republican politics the sense that white males are victims.”
- Former President Barack Obama

Today, some whites have taken the art of victimization to a new level. Criticism of whites becomes a whining session Paul Masson or Julio Gallo would appreciate. We must understand how complete the madness is.

“Aggrieved whiteness is a white identity politics aimed at maintaining white socio-political hegemony through challenging efforts to combat actual material racial inequality, while supporting heavily racialized investments in policing, prisons, and the military, and positing a narrative of antiwhite racial oppression loosely rooted in an assortment of racialized threats.” -Mike King

Aggrieved whiteness is a trait shown mainly by right-wing white men. They have problems reconciling how people are holding them accountable for the creation and maintenance of a system here in America and most of the world that has benefitted many of them by exploiting others. An example of this is an op-ed written in the July 3, 2017, edition of the Boston Globe titled “In Defense of the White Male” By Roland Merullo. In this article, we see the most common argument used by the white grievance crowd when the topic is racism. Here the author complains about how he thinks white men are mistreated, suggests that white males have done no more or less evil than anyone else, and wonders why in his view, everybody is picking on the poor oppressed white male.

“From Jews to African-Americans to homosexuals to Irish, Italian, and now Middle Eastern immigrants, hatred began by tossing all of them into a group, and attributing to that group the most unattractive characteristics imaginable. What is being done to “white males” now, it should go without saying, is not on a par with what was done to those people. But the instinct to label and blame is born of the same kind of group-think.”
-Roland Merullo

White males tossed all the people he mentioned into those groups and attributed those unattractive labels that many of us still face coming from members of the white male population today. This reality is what men like Marcus and other white men with this mindset willfully ignore. Therefore, they can write such articles and believe they have a legitimate grievance. To them, being held accountable is unfair blame. Yet they can hold anyone they want responsible even if it is made up. Again, this is part of the entitlement mentality that encompasses white male privilege. This kind of amnesia has allowed a part of the white community to embrace a position of white victimhood.

Mike King, Aggrieved Whiteness: White Identity Politics and Modern American Racial Formation, May 4, 2017

Roland Merullo, In Defense of the White Male, Boston Globe, July 3, 2017, In defense of the white male - The Boston Globe
Denying that men face a more difficult time in education, for example, is foolish and wrong-headed. Denying that men have fewer resources in dealing with mental health issues, for another, is also foolish. Or is your complaint only about white men (again), who face these same hurdles?

Finally, what are you going to do about the problem?
 
Pretending whites didn't create laws to purposefully deny others and created the animosity others may hold against whites is denying reality.
Wow, really had to run out in left field to come up with that, huh?
 
Denying that men face a more difficult time in education, for example, is foolish and wrong-headed. Denying that men have fewer resources in dealing with mental health issues, for another, is also foolish. Or is your complaint only about white men (again), who face these same hurdles?

Finally, what are you going to do about the problem?
I am talking about white men here. You use the term men as if white men are the only men. White men don't face anything compared to other men. And white men created the problem. So don't ask me what I am going to do about it. Look in the mirror WHITE MAN and figure it out.
 
https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.e231fe6f1a2d8f8cfc7cd6c7e7e97492?rik=kKiRukYse4XVUw&riu=http%3a%2f%2fclipart-library.com%2fimages%2f8iGbkBX5T.jpg&ehk=ozWAKnElL6m3K1D4AGMEYT5cH%2bmUs2lYwb%2brH3rxjHY%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0


Here we go with yet another day of self-hate, insecurity, and inferiority complex projected onto other people.
Wrong again loser. And your gaslighting won't work.
 
When your avatar is Pepe the frog, everyone knows that your post will be a bunch of nonsense.
 
Unlike you, I don't have to reach far to recognize reality.
You ignored what I said, and posted irrelevancy. I assume, so you didnt feel defeated in the second post of your stupid thread.
But alas.
 
I am talking about white men here. You use the term men as if white men are the only men. White men don't face anything compared to other men. And white men created the problem. So don't ask me what I am going to do about it. Look in the mirror WHITE MAN and figure it out.
Stop snarking “WHITE MAN” when speaking to a white person and demonstrating the racism from blacks the OP says exists.
 
View attachment 808660
THIS, is playing the victim.

Why do people dislike these men? Is it because they exist?
Or is it their draconian attitudes and beliefs?


“What’s always interesting to me is the degree to which you’ve seen created in Republican politics the sense that white males are victims.”
- Former President Barack Obama

Today, some whites have taken the art of victimization to a new level. Criticism of whites becomes a whining session Paul Masson or Julio Gallo would appreciate. We must understand how complete the madness is.

“Aggrieved whiteness is a white identity politics aimed at maintaining white socio-political hegemony through challenging efforts to combat actual material racial inequality, while supporting heavily racialized investments in policing, prisons, and the military, and positing a narrative of antiwhite racial oppression loosely rooted in an assortment of racialized threats.” -Mike King

Aggrieved whiteness is a trait shown mainly by right-wing white men. They have problems reconciling how people are holding them accountable for the creation and maintenance of a system here in America and most of the world that has benefitted many of them by exploiting others. An example of this is an op-ed written in the July 3, 2017, edition of the Boston Globe titled “In Defense of the White Male” By Roland Merullo. In this article, we see the most common argument used by the white grievance crowd when the topic is racism. Here the author complains about how he thinks white men are mistreated, suggests that white males have done no more or less evil than anyone else, and wonders why in his view, everybody is picking on the poor oppressed white male.

“From Jews to African-Americans to homosexuals to Irish, Italian, and now Middle Eastern immigrants, hatred began by tossing all of them into a group, and attributing to that group the most unattractive characteristics imaginable. What is being done to “white males” now, it should go without saying, is not on a par with what was done to those people. But the instinct to label and blame is born of the same kind of group-think.”
-Roland Merullo

White males tossed all the people he mentioned into those groups and attributed those unattractive labels that many of us still face coming from members of the white male population today. This reality is what men like Marcus and other white men with this mindset willfully ignore. Therefore, they can write such articles and believe they have a legitimate grievance. To them, being held accountable is unfair blame. Yet they can hold anyone they want responsible even if it is made up. Again, this is part of the entitlement mentality that encompasses white male privilege. This kind of amnesia has allowed a part of the white community to embrace a position of white victimhood.

Mike King, Aggrieved Whiteness: White Identity Politics and Modern American Racial Formation, May 4, 2017

Roland Merullo, In Defense of the White Male, Boston Globe, July 3, 2017, In defense of the white male - The Boston Globe
Always bringing the White Hate, can you tell us how did the White Man victimize you?
 
View attachment 808660
THIS, is playing the victim.

Why do people dislike these men? Is it because they exist?
Or is it their draconian attitudes and beliefs?


“What’s always interesting to me is the degree to which you’ve seen created in Republican politics the sense that white males are victims.”
- Former President Barack Obama

Today, some whites have taken the art of victimization to a new level. Criticism of whites becomes a whining session Paul Masson or Julio Gallo would appreciate. We must understand how complete the madness is.

“Aggrieved whiteness is a white identity politics aimed at maintaining white socio-political hegemony through challenging efforts to combat actual material racial inequality, while supporting heavily racialized investments in policing, prisons, and the military, and positing a narrative of antiwhite racial oppression loosely rooted in an assortment of racialized threats.” -Mike King

Aggrieved whiteness is a trait shown mainly by right-wing white men. They have problems reconciling how people are holding them accountable for the creation and maintenance of a system here in America and most of the world that has benefitted many of them by exploiting others. An example of this is an op-ed written in the July 3, 2017, edition of the Boston Globe titled “In Defense of the White Male” By Roland Merullo. In this article, we see the most common argument used by the white grievance crowd when the topic is racism. Here the author complains about how he thinks white men are mistreated, suggests that white males have done no more or less evil than anyone else, and wonders why in his view, everybody is picking on the poor oppressed white male.

“From Jews to African-Americans to homosexuals to Irish, Italian, and now Middle Eastern immigrants, hatred began by tossing all of them into a group, and attributing to that group the most unattractive characteristics imaginable. What is being done to “white males” now, it should go without saying, is not on a par with what was done to those people. But the instinct to label and blame is born of the same kind of group-think.”
-Roland Merullo

White males tossed all the people he mentioned into those groups and attributed those unattractive labels that many of us still face coming from members of the white male population today. This reality is what men like Marcus and other white men with this mindset willfully ignore. Therefore, they can write such articles and believe they have a legitimate grievance. To them, being held accountable is unfair blame. Yet they can hold anyone they want responsible even if it is made up. Again, this is part of the entitlement mentality that encompasses white male privilege. This kind of amnesia has allowed a part of the white community to embrace a position of white victimhood.

Mike King, Aggrieved Whiteness: White Identity Politics and Modern American Racial Formation, May 4, 2017

Roland Merullo, In Defense of the White Male, Boston Globe, July 3, 2017, In defense of the white male - The Boston Globe
Jesus, does this racist pos ever shut up?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top