- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,482
- 6,862
- 335
That's why I posted Mathew20:28 Just as the son of man did not come to be served', but to serve. =can't be Jesus who they serve and answers the snide remarks why I don't have a following (servants).
The following is most problematic;
(Luke 9:55-56)
But Jesus answered, "You do not know what kind of spirit you are of; for the Son of Man did not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them."
Yet Jesus said he came not to save but came to destroy;
Matthew 10: 34-40, Thomas Verse 16,
2 Peter 3:10
and claimed himself not only opposite in action to son of man, but in opposition to son of man(Shalem the Evening Star), by calling himself the Morning Star (the nemesis of Shalem) in
Rev 22:16.
First person testimony is damaging in any court of law(which has Evening Star symbols all over the courthouse), especially when it's a confession, and worse when it's a confession to opposition the Judge.
The following is most problematic;
(Luke 9:55-56)
But Jesus answered, "You do not know what kind of spirit you are of; for the Son of Man did not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them."
Yet Jesus said he came not to save but came to destroy;
Matthew 10: 34-40, Thomas Verse 16,
2 Peter 3:10
and claimed himself not only opposite in action to son of man, but in opposition to son of man(Shalem the Evening Star), by calling himself the Morning Star (the nemesis of Shalem) in
Rev 22:16.
First person testimony is damaging in any court of law(which has Evening Star symbols all over the courthouse), especially when it's a confession, and worse when it's a confession to opposition the Judge.