The Supreme Court was *never* going to hand the election to Donald Trump

[BS Filter]

The Supreme Court upheld slavery in 1856. Five years later we had a civil war. Get ready.

Five years is a long time to wait.

We don't have to wait five years. The point is that it's bound to happen.

 

[martybegan]

Analysis: The Supreme Court was *never* going to hand the election to Donald Trump

In a single sentence, the Supreme Court on Tuesday unraveled Donald Trump's grand plan to overthrow the 2020 election.

www.cnn.com

Though some, including Trump himself, are holding out hope lol

This is all to setup a demand for a full investigation after the dust has settled. We need court actions now to allow for court orders to preserve all election materials.

Then what? Count the preserved election materials three more times?

The definition of insanity.

Asking for answers, yet you don't want any.

 

[DrLove]

hat is old news

the real battle is the Texas lawsuit backed by nine other states at last count that is pending in the high court now

4th Down, Time for one more play. You know what that play is called?

Great video. But one problem. The odds on a Hail Mary hover around 5%.
Trump's odds are somewhere in the range of one in a thousand.

Hail Mary Probabilities

Baseball guru Tom Tango noticed the WP graph for the recent Monday night meltdown had the Seahawk's chances at 0.01 prior to the game-endin...

archive.advancedfootballanalytics.com

 

[d0gbreath]

Analysis: The Supreme Court was *never* going to hand the election to Donald Trump

In a single sentence, the Supreme Court on Tuesday unraveled Donald Trump's grand plan to overthrow the 2020 election.

www.cnn.com

Though some, including Trump himself, are holding out hope lol

This is all to setup a demand for a full investigation after the dust has settled. We need court actions now to allow for court orders to preserve all election materials.

Then what? Count the preserved election materials three more times?

Compare the signature outer envelopes to known voters. Confirm voters sent them. Confirm they are valid. Software checks, hardware checks, interviews will poll counters.

Right now all they are doing is re-counting, not investigating.

At least you're not asking for much.

 

[DrLove]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

 

[BlindBoo]

hat is old news

the real battle is the Texas lawsuit backed by nine other states at last count that is pending in the high court now

4th Down, Time for one more play. You know what that play is called?

http://https:/over/www.inquirer.com...77-mail-voting-republican-audit-20201203.html

You assume this is a one game season. You would be wrong.

This is the long fight, and the goal is to prevent this from ever happening again.

36 hour voting period, in person voting unless cause, national holiday for all elections.

I disagree. The goal is to try every conceivable measure, short of violence, to not only overturn the results of this election but also to divide the nation. No lie is too big for the Kangaroo Court to broadcast to the world.

I have no problem with election reform.

 

[martybegan]

Analysis: The Supreme Court was *never* going to hand the election to Donald Trump

In a single sentence, the Supreme Court on Tuesday unraveled Donald Trump's grand plan to overthrow the 2020 election.

www.cnn.com

Though some, including Trump himself, are holding out hope lol

This is all to setup a demand for a full investigation after the dust has settled. We need court actions now to allow for court orders to preserve all election materials.

Then what? Count the preserved election materials three more times?

Compare the signature outer envelopes to known voters. Confirm voters sent them. Confirm they are valid. Software checks, hardware checks, interviews will poll counters.

Right now all they are doing is re-counting, not investigating.

At least you're not asking for much.

I am asking to have my questions answered about potential fraud in an election that may have changed the results of the election.

 

[martybegan]

hat is old news

the real battle is the Texas lawsuit backed by nine other states at last count that is pending in the high court now

4th Down, Time for one more play. You know what that play is called?

http://https:/over/www.inquirer.com...77-mail-voting-republican-audit-20201203.html

You assume this is a one game season. You would be wrong.

This is the long fight, and the goal is to prevent this from ever happening again.

36 hour voting period, in person voting unless cause, national holiday for all elections.

I disagree. The goal is to try every conceivable measure, short of violence, to not only overturn the results of this election but also to divide the nation. No lie is too big for the Kangaroo Court to broadcast to the world.

I have no problem with election reform.

The before election fight has to be done to allow the post election fight.

 

[martybegan]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

She had no case for potential fraud, unlike currently.

 

[Mr Natural]

Those ungrateful bastards!

Especially after all St Trumpy has done for them.

 

[BlindBoo]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

I stand corrected, again. She called the Don in the middle of the night to congratulate him on winning and officially conceded the next day.

 

[BlindBoo]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

She had no case for potential fraud, unlike currently.

Haha. But if she had won, Donnie would have proclaimed the exact same thing he's claiming now.

Fraud is easy to claim. Have they proved anything in court?

 

[martybegan]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

She had no case for potential fraud, unlike currently.

Haha. But if she had won, Donnie would have proclaimed the exact same thing he's claiming now.

Fraud is easy to claim. Have they proved anything in court?

Was OJ proven the murderer in court?

These things take time, saying "no proof" in this timeframe is dishonest.

 

[JimH52]

Of course they weren't...This picture describes perfectly the who bogus voter fraud lie...

 

[BlindBoo]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

She had no case for potential fraud, unlike currently.

Haha. But if she had won, Donnie would have proclaimed the exact same thing he's claiming now.

Fraud is easy to claim. Have they proved anything in court?

Was OJ proven the murderer in court?

These things take time, saying "no proof" in this timeframe is dishonest.

In fact their court filings simply don't match the "Fraud" rhetoric they've been spewing to the Kangaroo Court on OAN or NewsMaxine and filling the flocks head with false hope.

 

[JimH52]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

She had no case for potential fraud, unlike currently.

Haha. But if she had won, Donnie would have proclaimed the exact same thing he's claiming now.

Fraud is easy to claim. Have they proved anything in court?

They have no proof. When he intimidated and harassed Republican legislatures to overturn the vote and name electors for him, that was naked treason. He was attempting a coup. If we had a decent AG, he would have told him exactly that. trump is a worthless POS...

 

[martybegan]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

She had no case for potential fraud, unlike currently.

Haha. But if she had won, Donnie would have proclaimed the exact same thing he's claiming now.

Fraud is easy to claim. Have they proved anything in court?

Was OJ proven the murderer in court?

These things take time, saying "no proof" in this timeframe is dishonest.

In fact their court filings simply don't match the "Fraud" rhetoric they've been spewing to the Kangaroo Court on OAN or NewsMaxine and filling the flocks head with false hope.

Like the false hope of Russia Russia Russia and the impeachment?

 

[martybegan]

Democrats have run a 4 year hissy fit over Trump beating Hillary, they just were able to use their embedded bureaucrats to make their mischief instead of having to sue like Trump is.

Hillary conceded the night of the election. The transition was started and a smooth transfer of power occurred. There was never really a question if it would happen or not.

Actually she waited (understandably) until the very next morning.
What are we here - Around 35 days and counting?

She had no case for potential fraud, unlike currently.

Haha. But if she had won, Donnie would have proclaimed the exact same thing he's claiming now.

Fraud is easy to claim. Have they proved anything in court?

They have no proof. When he intimidated and harassed Republican legislatures to overturn the vote and name electors for him, that was naked treason. He was attempting a coup. If we had a decent AG, he would have told him exactly that. trump is a worthless POS...

How is asking them to perform a process they have the right to do intimidation and treason?

What is the cost of those legislatures saying "no"?

When you claim everything is treason, nothing is treason.

 

[Mac-7]

hat is old news

the real battle is the Texas lawsuit backed by nine other states at last count that is pending in the high court now

4th Down, Time for one more play. You know what that play is called?

Great video. But one problem. The odds on a Hail Mary hover around 5%.
Trump's odds are somewhere in the range of one in a thousand.

Hail Mary Probabilities

Baseball guru Tom Tango noticed the WP graph for the recent Monday night meltdown had the Seahawk's chances at 0.01 prior to the game-endin...

archive.advancedfootballanalytics.com

If that is your security blanket be my guest

 

[easyt65]

Analysis: The Supreme Court was *never* going to hand the election to Donald Trump

In a single sentence, the Supreme Court on Tuesday unraveled Donald Trump's grand plan to overthrow the 2020 election.

www.cnn.com

Though some, including Trump himself, are holding out hope lol

I agree with the thread - the USSC was NEVER going to strip millions of Americans of their Constitutionally protected vote by overturning this election. I have said this from the start. It has NEVER happened....it will NEVER going to happen.