What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Rittenhouse Verdict

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,817
Reaction score
18,236
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
Nobody said it was a great thing. In fact, the point is that it was minor thing that nevertheless triggered some whacko to threaten, chase and attack him.
You mean other than he was living on the street, couldn't get his medications because of the riots, and then some assholes are fighting over the streets he has to live on.

A homeless person who was actively involved in committing a crime.
Yeah, fuck the homeless... Maybe we should just issue hunting licenses for them.


He never claimed to be an EMT. All he said was he had a first aid kit to help injured people.


1.) No one attacked them. 2.) Grosskreutz had his gun in his hand when he was trying to subdue Rittenhouse. He was obviously prepared to shoot Kyle.

yes, he pulled out his gun because some flop-sweaty maniac was shooting people in the fucking street.

Are you fucking retarded?

If he had shot Rittenhouse, Rittenhouse would have been written off as what he was - an active shooter - and the NRA fetishists would be throwing Grosskreutz a parade.
 

Ghost of a Rider

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
3,222
Reaction score
1,260
Points
210
Location
South Louisiana
You mean other than he was living on the street, couldn't get his medications because of the riots, and then some assholes are fighting over the streets he has to live on.

Irrelevant. Unless you’re suggesting Rittenhouse just let some whacko beat him and maybe kill him, I don’t see your point.
Yeah, fuck the homeless... Maybe we should just issue hunting licenses for them.

You are the one who keeps bringing up Rittenhouse violating curfew. If you’re going to keep citing his unlawful acts then you’re going to have to acknowledge those of the rioters that attacked him.

You can’t have it both ways.

He never claimed to be an EMT in that video. Try again.
yes, he pulled out his gun because some flop-sweaty maniac was shooting people in the fucking street.

One person in self defense.
Are you fucking retarded?

Are you? All I’ve done is give you facts. You’re the one conflating and exaggerating things and trying to insert irrelevancies into the discussion.
If he had shot Rittenhouse, Rittenhouse would have been written off as what he was - an active shooter - and the NRA fetishists would be throwing Grosskreutz a parade.
Now who’s being retarded?

The shooting of Rosenbaum was self defense and witnesses testified as much. Grosskreutz shooting Rittenhouse would not have changed that.
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,817
Reaction score
18,236
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
Irrelevant. Unless you’re suggesting Rittenhouse just let some whacko beat him and maybe kill him, I don’t see your point.
I'm sure you don't see the point at all, being a gun fetishist, Shooty McFlopsweat was living your dream.

You are the one who keeps bringing up Rittenhouse violating curfew. If you’re going to keep citing his unlawful acts then you’re going to have to acknowledge those of the rioters that attacked him.
Those other people didn't kill anyone. A lot of them were arrested and charged.

The shooting of Rosenbaum was self defense and witnesses testified as much. Grosskreutz shooting Rittenhouse would not have changed that.

No one would have questioned if he was justified if Shooty McFlopsweat was dead.
 

Ghost of a Rider

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
3,222
Reaction score
1,260
Points
210
Location
South Louisiana
I'm sure you don't see the point at all, being a gun fetishist, Shooty McFlopsweat was living your dream.

I still don’t see your point. So are you actually saying he should have just stood there and let the whacko beat and maybe kill him?
Those other people didn't kill anyone. A lot of them were arrested and charged.

Then quit bringing it up you idiot.
No one would have questioned if he was justified if Shooty McFlopsweat was dead.

Don’t be stupid, of course they would have.

I understand that a gun-fetishist hater like yourself would have been more than happy to bypass standard investigatory and legal procedures as long as a gun fetisist was dead but, that’s not how it works in the real world.
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,817
Reaction score
18,236
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
I still don’t see your point. So are you actually saying he should have just stood there and let the whacko beat and maybe kill him?

I am saying he should have stayed home in Antioch and minded his own fucking business.

Don’t be stupid, of course they would have.

I understand that a gun-fetishist hater like yourself would have been more than happy to bypass standard investigatory and legal procedures as long as a gun fetisist was dead but, that’s not how it works in the real world.

No, they really wouldn't have. After they get past their amazement that the NRA propaganda about a "good guy with a gun" actually happened (because it never really does), they would have realized Rittenhouse had already murdered two people and the guy with the gun who shot him stopped an active shooter.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
4,203
Reaction score
1,794
Points
208

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
4,203
Reaction score
1,794
Points
208
Two syllables is all it takes to define your intellect.

What you said is patently preposterous and ignorant. It is not obvious that Rittenhouse went hunting for black people. He had been in Kenosha the whole day without shooting anyone and was even doing un-white supremacist things like cleaning graffiti off buildings.

If he was hunting black people, he wasn’t very good at it.
Not good at it doesn't mean it wasn't murder.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
73,328
Reaction score
18,485
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Ridiculously ignorant.
But not surprised coming from a Tiny Minded Querdenken.

Defending yourself against felons assualting you, still not murder, let alone premeditated.

Whatever you do with your duck in the privacy of your own bedroom is up to you.
 

Ghost of a Rider

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
3,222
Reaction score
1,260
Points
210
Location
South Louisiana
I am saying he should have stayed home in Antioch and minded his own fucking business.

That doesn’t answer the question. We know he didn’t stay home but since he didn’t, he was attacked by Rosenbaum. So, are you saying he should have stood there and let Rosenbaum beat and maybe kill him?
No, they really wouldn't have. After they get past their amazement that the NRA propaganda about a "good guy with a gun" actually happened (because it never really does), they would have realized Rittenhouse had already murdered two people and the guy with the gun who shot him stopped an active shooter.

That’s not how it works Lumpy.
 

Ghost of a Rider

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
3,222
Reaction score
1,260
Points
210
Location
South Louisiana
Not good at it doesn't mean it wasn't murder.
Not being good at hunting black people and whether the shooting of Rosenbaum and Huber was murder are two separate issues.

1.) There is no basis whatsoever upon which to allege Rittenhouse went there to hunt black people.

2.) The jury determined that the shootings were in self defense.
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,817
Reaction score
18,236
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
That doesn’t answer the question. We know he didn’t stay home but since he didn’t, he was attacked by Rosenbaum. So, are you saying he should have stood there and let Rosenbaum beat and maybe kill him?

He had the option to retreat... He also went off on his own away from the other nuts with guns...

You know, most of us have the good sense to stay away from the crazy homeless person.


That’s not how it works Lumpy.

On the very rare occassion someone shoots an active shooter, that's exactly what the NRA does.

Forgetting that we only had an active shooter to start with because guns are so easy to get.
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
11,705
Reaction score
2,818
Points
265
Except that there's no real evidence for that. He certainly wasn't still trying to take the gun when Rittenhouse shot him in the back.




The part where he deliberately went to a riot zone with an assault rifle.... driving across state lines with a weapon he wasn't legally allowed to own.
Yes he was trying to take the gun immediately before rittenhouse shot him

He never drove across state lines with a weapon you uneducated fool
 

M14 Shooter

The Light of Truth
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
29,265
Reaction score
5,135
Points
290
Location
Where I can see you, but you can't see me

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,317
Reaction score
11,115
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
He had the option to retreat...

And the subhuman criminal pieces of shit had the option of not attacking him in the first place.
 

Vrenn

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2021
Messages
1,949
Reaction score
1,004
Points
918
And the subhuman criminal pieces of shit had the option of not attacking him in the first place.

In this deep red area, if someone were to come to the last BLM packing an AR, they would find themselves beaten and then arrested while they figure out their motives. We don't reward stupidity.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
4,203
Reaction score
1,794
Points
208
Defending yourself against felons assualting you, still not murder, let alone premeditated.

Whatever you do with your duck in the privacy of your own bedroom is up to you.
that's not what the law says and you know it.

Look for and finding someone to kill is premeditated murder.

Except among the Querdeken and, of course, when it's a white guy with an AR.
 

progressive hunter

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
36,013
Reaction score
19,486
Points
1,915
that's not what the law says and you know it.

Look for and finding someone to kill is premeditated murder.

Except among the Querdeken and, of course, when it's a white guy with an AR.
what case are you talking about, cause thats not what happened in kyles case,,
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top