Sandwich Guy Found Not Guilty

Killed? Is that the new criteria for being charged with assault on a Cop these days?
You compared it to Charlie Kirk in your post #91. There was no mention of killing before that. The guy was a jerk, no argument. Did he deserve to be treated as unfairly as the J6 protestors? The answer is a resounding NO---don't let ignorant democrat tactics color this as something it wasn't.
 
You compared it to Charlie Kirk in your post #91. There was no mention of killing before that. The guy was a jerk, no argument. Did he deserve to be treated as unfairly as the J6 protestors? The answer is a resounding NO---don't let ignorant democrat tactics color this as something it wasn't.
You aren't going to let this go are you? You are the one who made fun of the cost of a sandwich. Maybe the cost of a 30.06 bullet was too extreme of an example so I'll let it go.
 
You aren't going to let this go are you?
I respond to your posts. You are blowing this sandwich thing out. The worst thing about your rush to vilify this moron is you are making people defend his ridiculous actions. The cost of the sandwich was a tongue-in-cheek comment. SMFH.
 
I respond to your posts. You are blowing this sandwich thing out. The worst thing about your rush to vilify this moron is you are making people defend his ridiculous actions. The cost of the sandwich was a tongue-in-cheek comment. SMFH.
What's the cost of a rock thrown at a Federal Officer? Every high profile republican speaker on campus has been the victim of assault sometime in their careers. A pie in the face is a joke in the movies but it is assault in real life. So is a sandwich.
 
What's the cost of a rock thrown at a Federal Officer? Every high profile republican speaker on campus has been the victim of assault sometime in their careers. A pie in the face is a joke in the movies but it is assault in real life. So is a sandwich.
Are you drinking? I have said multiple times that the guy pulled a bonehead act. It can't be compared to a rock, a bullet or a punch. You're acting like a Piglosi democrat. I suppose you'll be calling for second graders to be incarcerated for attempted murder for pointing their finger guns at other students next. SMFH.
 
Are you drinking? I have said multiple times that the guy pulled a bonehead act. It can't be compared to a rock, a bullet or a punch. You're acting like a Piglosi democrat. I suppose you'll be calling for second graders to be incarcerated for attempted murder for pointing their finger guns at other students next. SMFH.
Jan 6 demonstrators (were encouraged) to commit bonehead acts and spent a year in custody after the FBI rounded them all up.
 
Jan 6 demonstrators (were encouraged) to commit bonehead acts and spent a year in custody after the FBI rounded them all up.
"March peacefully and patriotically and make your voices heard." is not encouraging trespassing or vandalism. BTW, unarmed trespassing is not a crime that calls for summary execution either. Maybe you are a Piglosi democrat. My bad.
 
Sandwich tosser is conditioned by TV, movies. TV & Radio news that harassing Police officers, Military etc. In the line of duty is not a big deal.

Scream in their faces with bullhorns. Beat on windows screaming non-stop. Throwing stuff, pushing over barricades, setting fires. It's all "their right" because TDS mainly.

Like Board Stain here, every post laughing or minimizing any attack on officers on duty. No big deal, they should just take it.
 
As a conservative I can say this about the topic:

Wgaf?

Personally, I believe that an assault charge requires some injury to the alleged victim.

Because the thrown sandwich (even if stale as ****) couldn’t actually have caused any injury, the behavior was not even an attempted assault. Juvenile? Yep. Ineffective? Yep.

But an assault? I don’t buy it.

The statute does not define “assault” directly — so courts interpret it according to federal common law. Under federal precedent (e.g., United States v. Chestaro, 197 F.3d 600, 605–06 (2d Cir. 1999)), “assault” under § 111 generally means:

  1. A willful attempt or threat to inflict injury upon another person, coupled with an apparent present ability to do so, or
  2. Any intentional display of force such as would give the victim reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm.
How ridiculous.
While a stale sandwich didn't do much, at the time the cop didn't know what was coming at him. I think he would be within his rights to have tazed or shot the guy. That being said, the corrupt courts today would probably have given the cop life. Meanwhile a stupid cop that shot an unarmed woman in the neck and killed her on J6 gets off scott free.
 
"March peacefully and patriotically and make your voices heard." is not encouraging trespassing or vandalism. BTW, unarmed trespassing is not a crime that calls for summary execution either. Maybe you are a Piglosi democrat. My bad.
A black Capital Cop shot and killed an unarmed white woman who might have been guilty of trespass during the Jan 6 . Who do we see about that?
 
15th post
Not sure of your claim to be a "concerned American" either but for argument sake what do you think about the execution of Jan 6 protester Ashli Babbitt?
I think I summed it up in my post #129. It was an unjust summary execution of an unarmed trespasser. Trespassing is not a capital crime. Clear enough?
 
Back
Top Bottom