- Thread starter
- #41
Once in a while you might try actually reading a linked article. Hansen's study concludes that climate sensitivity is higher than currently held.So climate models are flawed and wrong again?
Hindcasting - testing ones model and the inputs you feed it - is standard practice in climate modeling. Your contention here that they consistently failed is simply a lie.I remember in past debates where these models where transferred into the past and programmed with the historical data. Then they had to forward predict up to today's date, and....., it was miles away from current conditions. And now the models are wrong again. Hmm, these scientists are as much use as tits on a fish, but gullibles believe them.