jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,194
- 34,393
- 2,180
All the kickbacks and insider tradingI think the democrats are paying scientists to provide studies so that they can spend more money making the rich richer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All the kickbacks and insider tradingI think the democrats are paying scientists to provide studies so that they can spend more money making the rich richer
A multi trillion dollar deficit does not evince profitability. And how many politicians outrank the CEOs of Exxon, Shell or Saudi-Aramco on net worth?The most profitable industry, being Washington D.C. politics.
Propaganda? It is a fact that Democrats have a $100 trillion dollar plan to control the climate, or as I put it, make themselves rich
A multi trillion dollar deficit does not evince profitability. And how many politicians outrank the CEOs of Exxon, Shell or Saudi-Aramco on net worth?
What is your point?A multi trillion dollar deficit does not evince profitability. And how many politicians outrank the CEOs of Exxon, Shell or Saudi-Aramco on net worth?
A multi trillion dollar deficit does not evince profitability. And how many politicians outrank the CEOs of Exxon, Shell or Saudi-Aramco on net worth?
How many corporations have stated they will spend over a $100 trillion on solar and wind power?A multi trillion dollar deficit does not evince profitability. And how many politicians outrank the CEOs of Exxon, Shell or Saudi-Aramco on net worth?
No response?A multi trillion dollar deficit does not evince profitability. And how many politicians outrank the CEOs of Exxon, Shell or Saudi-Aramco on net worth?
No response?
My bet, crickets. It’s what I got when I asked.The proper question is, "How do so many in congress accrue multi-million-dollar fortunes while earning less than $200K a year?"
I have been a resident of Florida since 1971 and I have NEVER heard a single person here EVER use the term "canes" to refer to hurricanes. Tell your psychologist about that.
LOL!!!
How many years worth of ice cores did we get from Antarctica??
Under 70k years or over 800k years....
LOL!!!!
Short cock = small brain
If only Obama hadn't destroyed all the evidence.
Jewish guy still banging your ex?
Here we go, links to where Short Cock got smashed in debate....
![]()
How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?
This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...www.usmessageboard.com
![]()
The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago
McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...www.usmessageboard.com
Short Cock