Zone1 The JEW From JUDEA ISRAEL [Jesus]

Nazareth [Judaea] or Bethlehem [Judaea]?

  • Nazareth

    Votes: 5 71.4%
  • Bethlehem

    Votes: 2 28.6%

  • Total voters
    7
HITLER'S

MULLAH

LUIZA

TROLLS
View attachment 1059435

That is ridiculous since the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was appointed by the British, and he was neither a cleric or successful in negotiating with Hitler.
Hitler did not support the Grand Mufti because he has no popular support.
Palestine went with the Allies, against Germany.
 
the very interesting story about Jesus saving a woman
who, according to the story, had been caught EN FLAGRANTE and hauled out to be stoned sorta--definitively proves that Jesus was a Pharisee.
Contrary to that taught in Jelly bean school---
THE PHARISEES (the group that JESUS claimed to be
the appropriate leaders ---it's in the book----the one
you never read) were dead set against the death sentence--
IT, CERTAINLY, was not carried out in the remote villages---
it required a ruling ---on the rare cases it was employed,
by the SANHEDRIN in Jerusalem. Sorry folks---you time
in the church basement with the sunday school marm----
PERVERTED YOUR LITTLE MINDS
DEATH PENALTY----the
right----he was a pharisee----he didn't say "STONE'EM TO DEATH" -----uhm ---been in Israel? did you notice that there is no capital punishment there except for your heroes
like ADOLF EICHMANN----YA KNOW WHY? PHARISEAN
JUDAISM WON

In the account of the woman being accused of adultery, the whole thing was a setup by the Jews to entrap Jesus.

First of all, according to Jewish law there needed to be two witnesses. Those witnesses would be the ones making the accusation. And also in Jewish law, they had to be the first to throw the stones if the wished the death penalty. Usually people would settle for a lesser punishment, hence the death penalty was rare. And if a false witness accuses and stones an innocent person, they will be held accountable as murderers.

So where were the two witnesses? All they had was the woman. Why were they asking Jesus to condemn the woman? If they had witnesses then it should be them. Was the woman married? If so where was her husband to accuse her? Either way it was obvious these Pharisees were NOT following Jewish law. They were corrupt heretics not following Jewish law, much like todays “Jews”.

So if Jesus would had said to stone her, they would had accused him of not following the law. Also, under the occupation of the Romans they were not permitted to enforce the death penalty. So if Jesus would had condemned her to death, they would had ran to the Romans to have Jesus arrested.

So Jesus turned it on them and told them, “He who is without sin cast the first stone”, because he knew they were liars.

It is not clear if the woman was guilty or not. Jesus tells her, “Go and sin no more.”

Jesus taught that we need to repent of sins, and to stop sinning. He never taught to accept sin or to promote it, like fake Jews and fake Christians today do with promoting homosexuality.
 
right----he was a pharisee----he didn't say "STONE'EM TO DEATH" -----uhm ---been in Israel? did you notice that there is no capital punishment there except for your heroes
like ADOLF EICHMANN----YA KNOW WHY? PHARISEAN
JUDAISM WON

{...
The Pharisees (/ˈfærəsiːz/; Hebrew: פְּרוּשִׁים, romanized: Pərūšīm, lit. 'separated ones') were a Jewish social movement and school of thought in the Levant during the time of Second Temple Judaism. Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group no longer exists, their traditions are of great importance for the manifold Jewish religious movements.

Conflicts between Pharisees and Sadducees took place in the context of much broader and longstanding social and religious conflicts amongst Jews (exacerbated by the Roman conquest).[2] One conflict was cultural, between those who favored Hellenization (the Sadducees) and those who resisted it (the Pharisees). Another was juridical-religious, between those who emphasized the importance of the Temple with its rites and services, and those who emphasized the importance of other Mosaic Laws. A specifically religious point of conflict involved different interpretations of the Torah and how to apply it to current Jewish life, with Sadducees recognizing only the Written Torah and rejecting Prophets, Writings, and doctrines such as the Oral Torah and the resurrection of the dead.
...}

The Pharisees sound vastly better than the Old Testament, but the facts are that Israel is does mass murder all the time, like blowing up the King David Hotel to murder all the British peacekeepers. Then Menachim Begin gunned down Folke Bernadotte, the UN Moderator. He did this so he could then start wiping out hundreds of native villages like Deir Yassin. And since Menachim Begin was still elected Prime Minister, that means all of Israel is still guilty, violent, and murdering innocents.
 
you have some evidence of "violent ethnic cleansing"----
anything will do----photos of death marches, mass
executions, induced famines? For the record---there
was no shortage of cameras in the British Mandate
Palestine.

Just compare a 1945 map with one after 1948, and you will see that all the villages used to have Arab names and they almost all disappear. They were murdered. Wiped out. Just like Deir Yassin, which is well documented.
They gangs like Irgun, Stern, and Lehi, drove up in armored cars, and threw grenades in the homes to murder the natives.
 
This thread has really turned into a comedy. Pro-Palestine/Pro-Islamists making excuses for barbaric Muslims who want to wipe out the Jews. And also pro-Israel sycophants making claims they are still God’s chosen people.

Both sides are wrong. Both sides are anti-Christs. Which means unfortunately the vast majority of them will likely end up in hell for all eternity when it is all said and done. Do you really think you’re going to care who owns the land when you are tormented in hell for an eternity?

Pull your heads out of your asses folks, and get your priorities straight. Both Jews and Muslims have been fed a lot of lies. Muslims follow the lies of the great Pedophile Prophet, whose sole purpose is to lead people away from Jesus, by worshiping their false god “Allah”, who is really Baal. Jews follow the false teachings of Talmudic Rabbis from the 3rd and 4th century AD who completely reinvented Judaism. Jews today are mainly secular, non-religious, who only view “being Jewish” as an ethnic identity, and practice radical leftwing ideology such as Marxism and openly embrace and promote evils such as abortion, LGBTQ nonsense, and pornography.

The only solution to the “Middle East crisis” is for them all to read the Bible, without a “Rabbi” distorting the words, and to accept Jesus as the Messiah.
 
{...
The Pharisees (/ˈfærəsiːz/; Hebrew: פְּרוּשִׁים, romanized: Pərūšīm, lit. 'separated ones') were a Jewish social movement and school of thought in the Levant during the time of Second Temple Judaism. Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group no longer exists, their traditions are of great importance for the manifold Jewish religious movements.

Conflicts between Pharisees and Sadducees took place in the context of much broader and longstanding social and religious conflicts amongst Jews (exacerbated by the Roman conquest).[2] One conflict was cultural, between those who favored Hellenization (the Sadducees) and those who resisted it (the Pharisees). Another was juridical-religious, between those who emphasized the importance of the Temple with its rites and services, and those who emphasized the importance of other Mosaic Laws. A specifically religious point of conflict involved different interpretations of the Torah and how to apply it to current Jewish life, with Sadducees recognizing only the Written Torah and rejecting Prophets, Writings, and doctrines such as the Oral Torah and the resurrection of the dead.
...}

The Pharisees sound vastly better than the Old Testament, but the facts are that Israel is does mass murder all the time, like blowing up the King David Hotel to murder all the British peacekeepers. Then Menachim Begin gunned down Folke Bernadotte, the UN Moderator. He did this so he could then start wiping out hundreds of native villages like Deir Yassin. And since Menachim Begin was still elected Prime Minister, that means all of Israel is still guilty, violent, and murdering innocents.
you have no argument. In fact you are COMIC----"MURDER THE WHAT? "all the british peace keepers"??
you do know that you are joking----the brits never "kept peace" wherever they were stationed----they whistled HAIL
BRITANNIA as the "brown folk" killed each other-----of course including the many genocidal pogroms that were
going on in MUZZIE LANDS ---INCLUDING PALESTINE.
ALL GUILTY----if any MASS OF PEOPLE is guilty in the world---look to the mass genociders----to wit CHRISTIANS AND
MUSLIMS. YOU are dancing on the dead bodies of
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of hindus, zoroastrians, christians, muslims AND JEWS. Jews, hindus, zoroastrians ----do not
engage in YOUR festivities. Learn some history
 
Just compare a 1945 map with one after 1948, and you will see that all the villages used to have Arab names and they almost all disappear. They were murdered. Wiped out. Just like Deir Yassin, which is well documented.
They gangs like Irgun, Stern, and Lehi, drove up in armored cars, and threw grenades in the homes to murder the natives.
not documented at all-----in fact neither is the death count
in Gaza. I rely on real eyewitnesses----BTW DEIR YASSIN was "wiped out"??? try again "everyone died" -----in the King David Hotel bombing? How about ----the entire population of "THE SOUTH" got wiped out by General
Sherman.
 
Just compare a 1945 map with one after 1948, and you will see that all the villages used to have Arab names and they almost all disappear. They were murdered. Wiped out. Just like Deir Yassin, which is well documented.
They gangs like Irgun, Stern, and Lehi, drove up in armored cars, and threw grenades in the homes to murder the natives.
You should check out of map of Ukraine from the year 1800.
 
Just compare a 1945 map with one after 1948, and you will see that all the villages used to have Arab names and they almost all disappear. They were murdered. Wiped out. Just like Deir Yassin, which is well documented.
They gangs like Irgun, Stern, and Lehi, drove up in armored cars, and threw grenades in the homes to murder the natives.
what happened to the Jewish population of Yemen---which existed in that land since almost 2000 years before the RAPIST DOG OF MECCA WAS BORN----how about Iraq?
SPAIN? Iran? Morocco? well---some survived your
filth---and LEFT-----just like arab, fairly recent migrants,
and more remote invaders, to palestine, left their shanty squatters' shacks in and around 1948. It's well documented
 
You're for LGBTQ+++, openly, pridefully parading its filth and the practice and promotion of idolatry in YHWH's Holy Land. Got it. You're a fake "chosen one".
You also don't k ow anything about me. Keep trying.
 
IMG-20241102-WA0001(1).webp
 
you have some evidence of "violent ethnic cleansing"----
anything will do----photos of death marches, mass
executions, induced famines? For the record---there
was no shortage of cameras in the British Mandate
Palestine.

Of course and thank for asking. How about the testimony of IDF soldiers themselves about their orders in 1948? here they are interviewed and speaking Hebrew. You'll hear how Palestinians were forced from their homes and told to "go to Gaza" and then their homes were destroyed so that they'd have no compulsion to return. They were even told they could "return later" but of course that was a lie.

 
You should check out of map of Ukraine from the year 1800.
The Arab propagandist Sherlock_Holmes knows that the previous Arabic names are nostly translated from earlier Hebrew.
Even "al quds" is.
 

Attachments

  • 190892133_10158361525122689_2821315411686176376_n.webp
    190892133_10158361525122689_2821315411686176376_n.webp
    99.6 KB · Views: 25
Of course and thank for asking. How about the testimony of ...
Nah. The Haaretz ideology is infamous.
The motives for the rewriting history is understood. As well as the 2 who became liberal.
Suddenly they come up with new versions.
Too late.

PS
Very ironic how Pallywood adopt such high titles as "common" as "common dreams" as "peace."
 
Nah. The Haaretz ideology is infamous.
The motives for the rewriting history is understood. As well as the 2 who became liberal.
Suddenly they come up with new versions.
Too late.

PS
Very ironic how Pallywood adopt such high titles as "common" as "common dreams" as "peace."
So the retired soldiers are fake? is that what you're insinuating? actors or plants?

Go ahead you spineless idiot, deny reality, that's the new politics these days. Why do you people ask for evidence if all you plan to do with it is dismiss it as fake?

1736524943682.png
 
who, according to the story, had been caught EN FLAGRANTE and hauled out to be stoned sorta--definitively proves that Jesus was a Pharisee.

caught by who - jews or christians (romans) ... their pastime: persecution of the innocent.

only proves 91 is obsessed w/ jesus being a jew - the repudiation of moses their false commandments for everyone else who's honest can see judaism is the last practice jesus would be caught dead than granting its admission.
 
15th post
It is not clear if the woman was guilty or not. Jesus tells her, “Go and sin no more.”

never -

liars, the crucifiers have no limits to their corruption.

jesus answered heavenly - go and give happiness to all who you will please ...
 
That is ridiculous since the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was appointed by the British, and he was neither a cleric or successful in negotiating with Hitler.
Hitler did not support the Grand Mufti because he has no popular support.
Palestine went with the Allies, against Germany.
Many Arabs were on the side of the Allies, but even if all of the Palestinians were on the side of Germany, it wouldn't help his case. Germany wasn't occupying Palestine, Britain was.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom