Zone1 The JEW From JUDEA ISRAEL [Jesus]

Nazareth [Judaea] or Bethlehem [Judaea]?

  • Nazareth

    Votes: 5 71.4%
  • Bethlehem

    Votes: 2 28.6%

  • Total voters
    7
1000006277.webp
 
Excellent, I'm glad that this has now sunk in.

The claim I am substantiating is that the planning and execution of ethnic cleansing (between the British and Zionists) of Palestinians was underway even before March 22, 1919, that historic document is evidence to that effect. The scheming was clearly underway not only thirty years before the state of Israel declared independence but even before the British had any mandate in Palestine.
except that that document only attests to the displacement of people in the past, and the eventual displacement of certain people in the future. Therefore, it is not a cleansing. I'm not trying to defend it for what it IS, but it shouldn't be labeled as something it isn't.
 
except that that document only attests to the displacement of people in the past, and the eventual displacement of certain people in the future. Therefore, it is not a cleansing. I'm not trying to defend it for what it IS, but it shouldn't be labeled as something it isn't.
As I said but you're too dense to recall, that is but one piece of evidence.
 
As I said but you're too dense to recall, that is but one piece of evidence.
but evidence of what? It attests to a partial displacement based on socioeconomic and ethnic criteria. Is that the proposition you are trying to substantiate?
 
but evidence of what? It attests to a partial displacement based on socioeconomic and ethnic criteria. Is that the proposition you are trying to substantiate?
Evidence that the British and Zionists as early as at least 1919, sought to relocate Palestinian Arabs into Egypt and Syria concurrently with creating Jewish colonies.
 
Right and you are claiming that that means "one subset of the Arab population within the areas we're considering". It could easily be conveying that the areas in question contains ONLY Arab "peasantry" could it not? Then we can understand that it is differentiating between those people and Jews who were not considered for relocation to Syria and Egypt.

The document does not explicitly read "one subset of the Arab population" so let's stick to what was written rather than what you wish had been written.

You don't know what "exactly" means. The text "Arab peasantry" is not exactly the same as "one subset of the Arab population" do you disagree?

Yes, I said this is evidence, go and reread my posts, I never used the term "proof" so you're attacking a strawman as you are doing above with your chosen interpretation.

Can villages containing Arab peasants be ethnically cleansed of their populations? Yes of course they can.

Your are not very good at this, at least not when confronting me. You seek to obfuscate rather than elucidate, your objective is not to identify truth but to mask it, hide it so that the disgusting ideology of Jew supremacist Zionism and its history can be hidden from view as you strive to polish the turd like a good loyal little Zionist.

That is the same thing we saw from the Nazis, attempts to sanitize the record and justify racist atrocities.

That goes on today and we call it "Holocaust denial" and for that reason I accuse you of "Nakba denial".
I will help----the issue here is something like "euphemism"
At the time in question "arab peasantry" referred to arabs
who were landless and without profession and were very
much like those called GYPSIES in merry old....and "Travelers"
in Ireland. In the US they are called Gypsies if they are ethnic Gypsies with tribal affiliations and the Gypsy language OR
"homeless" if they are not gypsies but living on the
streets. IMO the best analogy of "arab peasantry" in that
time and place is "SQUATTERS" They lived on land which somehow are NOW being called "villages" ----handled
some animals which grazed on public land and they
did odd jobs that were available (on land purchased
by jews for farming projects) and they paid no taxes.
In the USA tri-state area, many Gypsies are squatters,
live in trucks and do odd jobs----often on cars. In Ireland,
and England, I have been told, Gypsies tended to squat near
rivers. Now and then municipalities do their best to get
rid of them. So, now you know.
 
IMG-20250108-WA0001.jpg

RACIST ARAB SUPREMACY GENOCIDE: EVER SINCE



Arab Defeat Puts Leftists In Quandary.
Sarasota Journal · ‎13 Jun 1967. Page 9

BEIRUT, Lebanon (AP) — The Arab defeat in the Middle East war leaves a big question mark over the future of the Palestine Liberation Organization and its firebrand leader — leftist Ahmed Shukairy.

Shukairy narrowly escaped capture by Israeli forces in Jerusalem and many of his "Liberation Army" are now prisoners of the Israelis.

"We will wipe Israel off the face of the map and no Jew will survive," Shukairy declared two days before the war broke out June 5.

He vowed to lead the vanguard of his troops into the Israeli sector of Jerusalem and set up a "purely Arab government" there for all of Palestine.

The 60-year-old former lawyer was seen briefly in Amman and Damascus in the last stages of the fighting wearing a khaki battle uniform. Persons who saw him said he looked fatigued and dejected.

His army of 15,000 guerrillas had moved into some of the Sinai and Gaza Strip positions evacuated by the U.N. Emergency Force before the fighting began. Several thousand of them are believed to be in Israeli hands with most of their arms and equipment.


(Scroll to the right, down)
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1063216
RACIST ARAB SUPREMACY GENOCIDE: EVER SINCE



Arab Defeat Puts Leftists In Quandary.
Sarasota Journal · ‎13 Jun 1967. Page 9

BEIRUT, Lebanon (AP) — The Arab defeat in the Middle East war leaves a big question mark over the future of the Palestine Liberation Organization and its firebrand leader — leftist Ahmed Shukairy.

Shukairy narrowly escaped capture by Israeli forces in Jerusalem and many of his "Liberation Army" are now prisoners of the Israelis.

"We will wipe Israel off the face of the map and no Jew will survive," Shukairy declared two days before the war broke out June 5.

He vowed to lead the vanguard of his troops into the Israeli sector of Jerusalem and set up a "purely Arab government" there for all of Palestine.

The 60-year-old former lawyer was seen briefly in Amman and Damascus in the last stages of the fighting wearing a khaki battle uniform. Persons who saw him said he looked fatigued and dejected.

His army of 15,000 guerrillas had moved into some of the Sinai and Gaza Strip positions evacuated by the U.N. Emergency Force before the fighting began. Several thousand of them are believed to be in Israeli hands with most of their arms and equipment.


(Scroll to the right, down)







Israeli Jewish professor:





- YouTube
 
Last edited:
1000006067.jpg

1000006179.webp

1000006292.jpg


That Avi Shlaim vs history:.
 
Last edited:
This Arab "sherlock_holmes" (blaming the victim pattern) reminds Goebbels Nazi propaganda in 1933:



Der Angriff, newspaper popularly associated with Dr. Goebbels, Nazi propaganda chief, editorially comments tonight on the so-called Arab revolt and attempts to justify it. It remarks sarcastically on the efforts of England, the mandatory power, to protect the Jewish population in Palestine and declares that “the Jews know how to provoke a people until there is bloodshed.”

Nazis Claim Credit for Palestine Arab Rioting; England is Ridiculed.
October 30, 1933.
https://www.jta.org/archive/nazis-claim-credit-for-palestine-arab-rioting-england-is-ridicule
 
Last edited:
Fighting pallywood since 1929.

This one, by Britain vs Arab lies


chrome_screenshot_Jan 9, 2025 5_23_40 AM CST.webp

Western Argus. 06 May 1930 - "WHY BRITAIN STAYS IN PALESTINE."


The terrible murders and outrages in Palestine last August with the slaughter of harmless women and children, and the burning and destruction of property caused a wave of horror and disgust throughout the world.

The British Goverment, taking the only course possible, appointed a Committee of Investigation into the cause of the outrages; but long before it had a chance to make its report the campaign re-opened in Britain for the Government either to throw up the Palestine Mandate.
or for the nation to go back on its pledged word ahd abandon its policy of giving facilities to the Jews to re-establish themselves in their ancestral homeland.
The actual facts, therefore, should be presented.

  • It has been said that the Arabs are "not out against the Jews, but against the predominance of the Zionist Jews."

    The fact is that of the 130 Jews who were slaughtered in the riots last August, 65 of them had nothing whatever to do with the
    Zionist colonies, but were members of families who had been settled in Palestine before the Balfour Declaration was made. Indeed, all who know Palestine, and are honest, admit that, if every Zionist Jew left the country; it would be the turn of the Christians next.

  • Again, 'it is said' that the Arabs are practically unrepresented in the administration.


    This is untrue. The senior ranks of the civil service in Palestine there are 299 Christians, including Arab Christians, 187 Moslems and only 68 Jews.
    In the junior service the figures are 1220 Christians, 1025 Moslems and 699 Jews.

  • Then it is said that the greater part of the revenue of thle country is being spent on furthering the aims of the Zionists and to the detriment of the Arab population.

    The fact is that the Jews contribute 42 per cent of the revenue and taxation, and receive little financial aid from the Government.
 
Last edited:
15th post
This Arab "sherlock_holmes" (blaming the victim pattern) reminds Goebbels Nazi propaganda in 1933:



Der Angriff, newspaper popularly associated with Dr. Goebbels, Nazi propaganda chief, editorially comments tonight on the so-called Arab revolt and attempts to justify it. It remarks sarcastically on the efforts of England, the mandatory power, to protect the Jewish population in Palestine and declares that “the Jews know how to provoke a people until there is bloodshed.”

Nazis Claim Credit for Palestine Arab Rioting; England is Ridiculed.
October 30, 1933.
https://www.jta.org/archive/nazis-claim-credit-for-palestine-arab-rioting-england-is-ridicule
Please be frank, what statement of mine, specifically, are you taking issue with? What EXACTLY did I write that you are disputing?

I'm always happy to supply supporting material for ANY claims I make about ANYTHING I discuss in this entire forum.
 
This Arab "sherlock_holmes" (blaming the victim pattern) reminds Goebbels Nazi propaganda in 1933:



Der Angriff, newspaper popularly associated with Dr. Goebbels, Nazi propaganda chief, editorially comments tonight on the so-called Arab revolt and attempts to justify it. It remarks sarcastically on the efforts of England, the mandatory power, to protect the Jewish population in Palestine and declares that “the Jews know how to provoke a people until there is bloodshed.”

Nazis Claim Credit for Palestine Arab Rioting; England is Ridiculed.
October 30, 1933.
https://www.jta.org/archive/nazis-claim-credit-for-palestine-arab-rioting-england-is-ridicule
The Arab tried to rationalize Sidi Mohamed Abdallahi fascist Islamic shooter too.
 
View attachment 1063287
View attachment 1063290
View attachment 1063288

That Avi Shlaim vs history:.
Intelligent, thoughtful, ethical secular Jews understand that just because they might have had a great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandparent who lived in the Holy Land 2000 years ago, that doesn't somehow give them a right to take other people's homes, lands, much less dehumanize, brutalize and slaughter people.

For those who are foolish enough to cite the Biblical text as "proof" that the Holy Land is Jewish land, they better abide by the rules stipulated in the "contract" set by the God of that Bible you're quoting from. You need to keep the Torah, and that includes enforcing it in the land, something many Orthodox Jews aren't willing to do. They want to study Talmud all day in the Yeshiva while the secular Jews defend the country.

According to the Biblical text, the Sanhedrin has to be established in the land and the Orthodox Jews must take charge of the government. The only "Goyim" allowed in the Holy Land are the Noachide, who are under the authority of the Sanhedrin and local rabbis/beit din. This is unacceptable:


IDOLATRY.png

Half-naked Jews dancing around a giant idol of the Buddha on October 7th..

LGBTQ ISRAHELL.png


Mideast-Israel-Gay-Pr_Horo-e1402704193394.jpg

Homosexual (Sodom and Gomorrah) "Pride" Parades, where the Jewish Sodomites thumb their noses at YHWH.

Leviticus 18:24–30 (JPS 1985) 24 Do not defile yourselves in any of those ways, for it is by such that the nations that I am casting out before you defiled themselves.25 Thus the land became defiled, and I called it to account for its iniquity, and the land spewed out its inhabitants.26 But you must keep My laws and My rules, and you must not do any of those abhorrent things—neither the citizen nor the stranger who resides among you;27 for all those abhorrent things were done by the people who were in the land before you, and the land became defiled.28 So let not the land spew you out for defiling it, as it spewed out the nation that came before you.29 All who do any of those abhorrent things—such persons shall be cut off from their people.30 You shall keep My charge not to engage in any of the abhorrent practices that were carried on before you, and you shall not defile yourselves through them: I am YHWH your Elohim.

YHWH tells the Israelites:

Leviticus 25:23 (JPS 1985)
“But the land must not be sold beyond reclaim, for the land is Mine; you are but strangers/גֵּרִים (geirim), resident with Me.”
 
You need to keep the Torah, and that includes enforcing it in the land, something many Orthodox Jews aren't willing to do. They want to study Talmud all day in the Yeshiva while the secular Jews defend the country.
Then you don't understand their position in this.
According to the Biblical text, the Sanhedrin has to be established in the land and the Orthodox Jews must take charge of the government. The only "Goyim" allowed in the Holy Land are the Noachide, who are under the authority of the Sanhedrin and local rabbis/beit din.
can you show me reference to the Sanhedrin in biblical text? If not, show me the biblical reference to "local rabbis/beit din."

If you don't see the Jewish texts as authoritative, then why do you take the Torah statements against these behaviors as normative?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom