Zone1 The JEW From JUDEA ISRAEL [Jesus]

[irosie91]

Why do racist extremist-Islamists always use, wrongly, the word "truth"?
Is it supposed to convince?

yes----the Josef Goebbels principle

 

[Sayaras]

Oh. Infamous racist Arab liar Sherlock_holmes is still on.

the one excuses Arab racist hate crimes in the US and blaming the victims...

View attachment 1062786
In NYC, Jews targeted in hate crimes more than all other groups combined in 2024

In NYC, Jews targeted in hate crimes more than all other groups combined in 2024 | The Times of Israel

www.timesofisrael.com

Thanks for reminding about this racist Arab Muslim "sherlock_holmes" only motivated by bigotry. Not "facts" or "truth."

 

[Sayaras]

View attachment 1062911
View attachment 1062923

View attachment 1062924

REPLY #6 TO LYING NAZI-MULLAH "TruthNotBS" (Spamming the boards with pAleStInIaN/Iranian/Turkish/Qatar Islamic hate + lies garbage; neo-nazi clips, and justifying Hitler too).

---

The Quran Unveiled: Essential Facts Every Reader Should Know.


Oct 14
2024.

In this video, The Quran Unveiled: Essential Facts Every Reader Should Know, we take you on a journey to uncover the foundational truths about the Quran, the holy book of Islam. Whether you're new to the Quran or looking to deepen your understanding, this video breaks down its historical origins, structure, language, and profound impact on over 1.8 billion Muslims worldwide.

We’ll explore key topics, such as how the Quran was revealed to "Prophet" Muhammad over 23 years, its unique structure with suras (chapters) and ayahs (verses), and its role as a guide for spirituality, morality, and law. Learn about the miraculous nature of the Quran’s Arabic language, considered by many Muslims to be inimitable, and its influence on Islamic civilization, literature, and philosophy.

We’ll also address common questions: How does the Quran compare to other religious texts? What are its central themes? And how has it been preserved and transmitted through centuries? Whether you’re curious about the Quran’s message, its historical context, or how it shapes the daily lives of Muslims, this video provides essential insights that every reader should know.



___


The many faces of Islamo-Nazism

25 Aug 2014 — Contemporary Islamo-Nazism is of a different nature. It consists of murderous Muslims whose ideology overlaps with core genocidal elements of Nazism.

The many faces of Islamo-Nazism | The Jerusalem Post

Contemporary Islamo-Nazism is of a different nature.

www.jpost.com

___

Efran Fard - The Genocidal Cult of Islamo-Nazism.
X
13 nov 2023 — The Genocidal Cult of Islamo-Nazism Op-ed: @EQfard https://t.co/tDX9dELns0 via @CapitolInstitut |#IslamicTerrorism| #HamasTerrorrists|


___

Muslim Brotherhood Are Nazi Inspired” |
A senior Hamas official says the second handover of Israeli hostages is being delayed due to Israeli violations of the pause agreement.
YouTube · TalkTV · 25 nov 2023


_____

What Muslim extremists and neo-Nazis have in common.

Typically, this racist-imam "TruthNotBS" rages against gays and against orthodox Jews Talmud who oppose gay marches in the same breath...

 

[irosie91]

That doesn't show Muslims or Palestinians in the Holy Land hosting "Gay Pride Parades" or celebrating, pridefully, brazenly exalting homosexuality..etc. The fool who said that Palestinians are responsible due to a few Arabs in the Keneset supposedly allowing this is nonsense. Muslims would never allow this in the HOLY LAND, not the land of homos and idolatry. Jews have turned the Holy Land into a brothel, a giant red-light district.

Hotels in Mecca have "call-girl" services---but that's ok---
every once in awhile Qadis sentence teenaged boys to death
for fiddling with each other

 

[BreezeWood]

... always use, wrongly, the word "truth"? - Is it supposed to convince?

yes----the Josef Goebbels principle

is the j g principle something brand new ...

how hard is it for judaism, 91 - to believe their phonies - moses and abraham when they claim they were spoken to by the heavens.

- just curious if they will be tortured if they claimed otherwise than that being the - "truth" ... what is the burden for their beliefs they attempt to convince others of so obvious - the validity of what they claim.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

sure it does. The document explicitly reads "if...emigration scheme...could not be arranged for the Arab Palestinian peasantry..." and later, the words "Arab peasantry" are repeated.

Right and you are claiming that that means "one subset of the Arab population within the areas we're considering". It could easily be conveying that the areas in question contains ONLY Arab "peasantry" could it not? Then we can understand that it is differentiating between those people and Jews who were not considered for relocation to Syria and Egypt.

The document does not explicitly read "one subset of the Arab population" so let's stick to what was written rather than what you wish had been written.

No, it is exactly what the text says.

You don't know what "exactly" means. The text "Arab peasantry" is not exactly the same as "one subset of the Arab population" do you disagree?

might? So you have no proof. How convenient.

Yes, I said this is evidence, go and reread my posts, I never used the term "proof" so you're attacking a strawman as you are doing above with your chosen interpretation.

ah, so you accept that it was "parts of the population." Great. So not a cleansing.

Can villages containing Arab peasants be ethnically cleansed of their populations? Yes of course they can.

Your are not very good at this, at least not when confronting me. You seek to obfuscate rather than elucidate, your objective is not to identify truth but to mask it, hide it so that the disgusting ideology of Jew supremacist Zionism and its history can be hidden from view as you strive to polish the turd like a good loyal little Zionist.

That is the same thing we saw from the Nazis, attempts to sanitize the record and justify racist atrocities.

That goes on today and we call it "Holocaust denial" and for that reason I accuse you of "Nakba denial".

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

no, but if the request had been to remove ALL Arabs, and not a specific segment, that would show an intent to cleanse. Why did the document say that the request was limited to one section?

This is the phraseology I'd expect to see if the ethnic cleansing was to be carried out against villages occupied by Palestinian peasants.

I rarely discuss it and haven't investigated what went on.

Nor have you investigated these historic records and you knew nothing of them until I brought them to your attention.

There is a collection of interviews of soldiers who participated in ethnic cleansing of Arab villages in 1948, they will help you understand all this, have you really not seen them? they tell their stories in their own words, they are available on youtube.

 

[rosends]

Right and you are claiming that that means "one subset of the Arab population within the areas we're considering". It could easily be conveying that the areas in question contains ONLY Arab "peasantry" could it not? Then we can understand that it is differentiating between those people and Jews who were not considered for relocation to Syria and Egypt.

If those were the only Arabs there, then why would they not simply be identified geographically, or by the generic "Palestinian Arabs"? The addition of "peasantry" creates a category and excludes people from that category. Let's refrain from interpretation and imagining possibilities. The document does not explicitly say "all the Arabs" so let's stick with what it says.

You don't know what "exactly" means. The text "Arab peasantry" is not exactly the same as "one subset of the Arab population" do you disagree?

Here is a definition of "exactly" -- "in exact terms; without vagueness." As there is no vagueness there, and the creation of "peasantry" means "not not peasantry" it creates a subset. Exactly.

Yes, I said this is evidence, go and reread my posts, I never used the term "proof" so you're attacking a strawman as you are doing above with your chosen interpretation.

There is no evidence that leads to "might." The sentence you wrote "for all you know the British at that time might have informally used the term in a general sense." has 4 separate incidences of equivocation, but you still think you have "evidence"?

Can villages containing Arab peasants be ethnically cleansed of their populations? Yes of course they can.

So your argument isn't that there was cleansing of Arabs but that particular members of the Arab population would be moved by the British government. If I as someone to get out of my chair, am I ethnically cleansing him from my chair? If two people are on my chair, and I make 1 move because he is a lefty, is that ethnic cleansing? Nothing says that villages were to be cleansed of their populations -- just of some of the population (unless you have a piece of evidence that these were villages that had ONLY peasantry. Do you?)

Your are not very good at this, at least not when confronting me. You seek to obfuscate rather than elucidate, your objective is not to identify truth but to mask it, hide it so that the disgusting ideology of Jew supremacist Zionism and its history can be hidden from view as you strive to polish the turd like a good loyal little Zionist.

And you seem to prefer to create alternative universes and change things to suit your tastes. I applaud your imagination!

That goes on today and we call it "Holocaust denial" and for that reason I accuse you of "Nakba denial".

when did I deny the Nakba?

 

[rosends]

This is the phraseology I'd expect to see if the ethnic cleansing was to be carried out against villages occupied by Palestinian peasants.

only if the villages had only peasants. But then I'd expect the phraseology to label them without limiting economic class.

Nor have you investigated these historic records and you knew nothing of them until I brought them to your attention.

yes, and I'm looking at the document you presented and the words in it and discussing the meaning. Is there a problem with that?

There is a collection of interviews of soldiers who participated in ethnic cleansing of Arab villages in 1948, they will help you understand all this, have you really not seen them? they tell their stories in their own words, they are available on youtube.

if you want to build an argument on that, then go and start a thread to discuss that. You cited this. If this doesn't prove your case, find new foundational evidence. It's not rocket science.

 

[BreezeWood]

when did I deny the Nakba?

why deny what has been cooked ...

In 2011, Israel passed a law known as the Nakba Law, that limits freedom of speech regarding the Nakba and the founding of Israel. The law affects organizations that receive funding from the government, in whole or in part.

...............

what might the rabbit have to say ...

how hard is it for judaism, 91 - to believe their phonies - moses and abraham when they claim they were spoken to by the heavens.

do jews really believe the heavens have spoken to anyone and does that include jesus.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

only if the villages had only peasants. But then I'd expect the phraseology to label them without limiting economic class.

yes, and I'm looking at the document you presented and the words in it and discussing the meaning. Is there a problem with that?

if you want to build an argument on that, then go and start a thread to discuss that. You cited this. If this doesn't prove your case, find new foundational evidence. It's not rocket science.

Once again you lie openly, I told you already I never cited that 1919 official British record as "proof" but as evidence.

You are a liar, you cannot find any post from me describing that 1919 record as "proof" can you? so why make the claim?

 

[rosends]

Once again you lie openly, I told you already I never cited that 1919 official British record as "proof" but as evidence.

where did I lie? All I said was that it didn't serve as evidence of anything because, as you said, there are 4 different types of equivocation in your statement so no fact is being established. Evidence is defined as "the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid." Since you are not establishing a true or valid proposition, but one mired in equivocation, the text cannot be evidence of anything.

You are a liar, you cannot find any post from me describing that 1919 record as "proof" can you? so why make the claim?

hey, if you are stating that the document you cited was not proof of anything, I'm happy to agree.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Typically, this racist-imam "TruthNotBS" rages against gays and against orthodox Jews Talmud who oppose gay marches in the same breath...

You can't have it both ways, having your cake and eating it too. Choose one or the other. If you're the supposed "chosen people" of the Biblical God, who gave the land that is now being disputed to the Israelites and their progeny, as clearly expressed in the Hebrew Bible, then there is ZERO TOLERANCE for this crap:

Jews dancing half-naked around a giant idol of the Buddha, in a music festival on October 7th.

​

Don't appeal to the Bible, in your attempt to justify your taking of the land, while ignoring the requirements established by the God of the same Bible that you're claiming gave you the land. The reality is that the land belongs to God according to the Hebrew Bible:

Leviticus 25:23
But the land must not be sold beyond reclaim, for the land is Mine; you are but strangers (Geir) resident with Me.

​

Leviticus 18:24–28, 30​

These verses discuss how the previous inhabitants defiled the land and were vomited out. Israel is warned the same could happen to them if they commit the same abominations.

Leviticus 18:24
Do not defile yourselves in any of those ways, for it is by such that the nations that I am casting out before you defiled themselves.
Leviticus 18:25
Thus the land became defiled and I called it to account for its iniquity, and the land vomited out its inhabitants.
Leviticus 18:26
But you must keep My laws and My rules, and you must not do any of those abhorrent things, neither the citizen nor the stranger who resides among you.
Leviticus 18:27
For all those abhorrent things were done by the people who were in the land before you, and the land became defiled.
Leviticus 18:28
So let not the land vomit you out for defiling it, as it vomited out the nation that came before you.
Leviticus 18:30
You shall keep My charge not to engage in any of the abhorrent practices that were carried on before you, and you shall not defile yourselves through them: I am YHWH your Elohim.

​

Leviticus 26:13–17​

This passage illustrates the blessings and curse theme: If Israel obeys YHWH, they will be blessed; if they break His covenant, they will be cursed.

Leviticus 26:13
I YHWH am your Elohim who brought you out from the land of the Egyptians to be their slaves no more; who broke the bars of your yoke and made you walk erect.
Leviticus 26:14
But if you do not obey Me and do not observe all these commandments,
Leviticus 26:15
if you reject My laws and spurn My rules, so that you do not observe all My commandments and you break My covenant,
Leviticus 26:16
I in turn will do this to you: I will wreak misery upon you—consumption and fever, which cause the eyes to pine and the body to languish; you shall sow your seed to no purpose, for your enemies shall eat it.
Leviticus 26:17
I will set My face against you: you shall be routed by your enemies, and your foes shall dominate you. You shall flee though none pursues.

Jeremiah 18:7–10​

This passage shows that YHWH can decree good or evil for a nation, but will change His plan if that nation’s actions change—whether for better or for worse.

Jeremiah 18:7
At one moment I may decree that a nation or a kingdom shall be uprooted and pulled down and destroyed;
Jeremiah 18:8
but if that nation against which I made the decree turns back from its wickedness, I change My mind concerning the punishment I planned to bring on it.
Jeremiah 18:9
At another moment I may decree that a nation or a kingdom shall be built and planted;
Jeremiah 18:10
but if it does what is displeasing to Me and does not obey Me, then I change My mind concerning the good I planned to bestow upon it.

​

Clear as day. Just because someone identifies as a "Jew", doesn't make them an Israelite in good standing with YHWH, in a position to receive his covenantal blessings. The Assyrian empire, hundreds of years before Jesus and the Babylonian exile, had already taken the ten tribes of Israel, to other regions of its empire, replacing them with Samaritans. The Samaritans were a mix of Assyrian, Israelite..etc. Israelite descendants are now everywhere in the Middle East. Abraham was from the city of Ur, which is now in Kuwait. The Hebrew Bible identifies Jacob as an Aramean. They were "Chaldeans", originally from Mesopotamia.

Christian Evangelicals worship Jews, essentially. They grovel at the feet of Jews, thinking every Jew is a godlike being, even if they spit in the face of Jesus and bomb a city full of children to the ground, turning it into rubble. It doesn't matter how many satanic "gay pride" parades these Jews host in the Holy Land, defiling it with their filth and idolatry. And you ZioNazi trash dare to claim that Muslims are pro-LGBTQ+++ and equally culpable, due to the few token Arab Israeli government officials in your Jewish supremacist ethno-state. Yeah sure...

​

I don't advocate what the image conveys. Nonetheless, it is a fact. Muslims in general are violently intolerant towards homosexuals, who are out of the closet, brazen, parading their filth in the street, thumbing their noses at heaven.

Are all the Jews in the Israeli government pro-gay pride/thumbing their noses at YHWH? In favor of Sodomizing the Holy Land with their secular Jewish compatriots? Being in the Israeli Jewish-run government automatically makes you in favor of this filth? No, hence why argue that the few Arabs who are government officials in a Jewish State are by default responsible for this filth? How confused and disingenuous you are.

The reason that these demonic parades occur in Tel Aviv and not in Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods or Muslim communities is because these brazen gay hoards would get stoned to death. The Hebrew Bible orders Jews to stop this type of open, out-of-the-closet display of promiscuity. Not to do that leads to more pain and suffering, including death. Children confused about their gender, boys on puberty blockers, girls getting their breasts cut off to "transition" them into "boys"..etc.

• Syphilis
  More than 70% of early syphilis cases in the United States are among gay and bisexual men. In 2017, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 79.6% of all primary and secondary syphilis cases among males.
• HIV
  MSM make up more than half of all new HIV infections. In New York City, men who have sex with men have a 140-fold higher risk for newly diagnosed HIV compared with heterosexual men

People who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBTQ+) are at higher risk of experiencing mental health issues than heterosexual people, even in the most EGALITARIAN, LIBERAL cultures, including Northern Europe: Norway, Sweden, Denmark..etc:

• Depression and anxiety
  A Stonewall study found that half of LGBTQ+ people had experienced depression in the past year, and three in five had experienced anxiety.
• Substance abuse
  LGB individuals are at least 1.5 times more likely to experience substance use disorders than heterosexual individuals.
• Suicide
  One in eight LGBTIQ+ people aged 18 to 24 had attempted to end their life, and almost half of trans people had thought about taking their life.
• Gender differences
  Gay and bisexual men are more likely to experience mood disorders, while lesbian and bisexual women are more likely to experience substance-related issues.
• Bisexual individuals
  Bisexual individuals have especially high risks for experiencing adverse mental health outcomes.

This isn't just in Alabama or Saudi Arabia, this is in the most liberal, egalitarian, "progressive" communities as well. You're condemning children to a life of hardship, disease, and confusion, by filling their minds with all of this LGBTQ+++ NONSENSE. Demonic trash. Yes, demons:

​

They exist and they influence us, when we're not careful. In Islam they're called "Jinn" and some of them are wicked, feeding off of our emotions and suffering. The only way to protect yourself against these forces is through prayer and aligning your actions with divine law/order. That is the only way to not be controlled by evil spirits.

There is no such thing as "secular Israel". Israel by its very name, entails wrestling with the metaphysical. With spiritual forces. Atheist Israel is an oxymoron, it can't exist. The Kingdom of Heaven will never grant secular Jews peace in the Holy Land. The land will vomit them out, constantly. They chose the wrong location to establish their secular, satanic state.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

where did I lie? All I said was that it didn't serve as evidence of anything because, as you said, there are 4 different types of equivocation in your statement so no fact is being established. Evidence is defined as "the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid." Since you are not establishing a true or valid proposition, but one mired in equivocation, the text cannot be evidence of anything.

You repeatedly argue that I have not "proven" something yet I never claimed to have, that's a strawman, a form of dishonesty.

On that basis I call you a liar.

Failure to elicit your agreement that ethnic cleansing took place, does not concern me, it is for the open minded reader to decide for themselves if the evidence supports the claims of ethnic cleansing. Your opinion is of no significance to me.

Since you're already shown here to be a liar your opinion on the matter is likewise, suspect at best.

hey, if you are stating that the document you cited was not proof of anything, I'm happy to agree.

More strawmen, nowhere did I say that the 1919 document is "not proof of anything", you cannot help but lie, it is your nature and that's how you became a Zionist you find lying valuable.

 

[BreezeWood]

where did I lie?

how hard is it for judaism, 91 - to believe their phonies - moses and abraham when they claim they were spoken to by the heavens.

do jews really believe the heavens have spoken to anyone and does that include jesus.

the preamble of all three desert religion bibles are the same - is this the truth what they claim or not ... who really is the serpent in the garden, the true story be it told.

 

[hobelim]

who really is the serpent in the garden, the true story be it told.

The serpent in the garden represents any person who promotes as good what God has forbidden like any conman who claims that one must worship Jesus as if he was God or you will be damned

FOREVER

only to pick your pockets while you are groveling and blubbering before a statue of baby Jesus.

Take a look at a direct descendant of that elusive talking serpent of old...Satan is SO SCARY! lol

 

[BreezeWood]

The serpent in the garden represents any person who promotes as good what God has forbidden ...

close ... as close as saying any desert dweller that reads their bibles.

that can only be evil - what is forbidden by the heavens.

 

[rosends]

You repeatedly argue that I have not "proven" something yet I never claimed to have, that's a strawman, a form of dishonesty.

I haven't done that. You might be responding to me in error. I mentioned ONCE that you had no proof of a particular claim. You then said that the source document was labeled by you as evidence, so I showed how it could not serve as evidence. I have not argued about proof repeatedly. I would suggest that claiming I did something which i did not do is a form of dishonesty, but I'm hopeful that you have crossed threads and that someone else is asking you about proof.

View attachment 1063101
On that basis I call you a liar.

on the basis of telling me I did something I didn't do. Irony, anyone?

More strawmen, nowhere did I say that the 1919 document is "not proof of anything", you cannot help but lie, it is your nature and that's how you became a Zionist you find lying valuable.

so it IS proof of something? Either it is or isn't. Just let me know either way. You claim I am asking for proof, but you say the document is evidence, not proof. But now you don't want that conclusion to be drawn. Either it is or isn't proof. Which is it?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I haven't done that. You might be responding to me in error. I mentioned ONCE that you had no proof of a particular claim. You then said that the source document was labeled by you as evidence, so I showed how it could not serve as evidence. I have not argued about proof repeatedly. I would suggest that claiming I did something which i did not do is a form of dishonesty, but I'm hopeful that you have crossed threads and that someone else is asking you about proof.

on the basis of telling me I did something I didn't do. Irony, anyone?

so it IS proof of something? Either it is or isn't. Just let me know either way. You claim I am asking for proof, but you say the document is evidence, not proof. But now you don't want that conclusion to be drawn. Either it is or isn't proof. Which is it?

The 1919 document is proof of numerous things and evidence of other things. For example it is proof that a meeting took place between Rothschild and Weizmann and that Lawrence of Arabia was present at the meeting, on March 22, 1919.

It also proves that the displacement of Palestinians had taken place earlier and so on. There's nothing difficult about any of this so I cannot imagine why you are confused.

 

[rosends]

The 1919 document is proof of numerous things and evidence of other things. For example it is proof that a meeting took place between Rothschild and Weizmann and that Lawrence of Arabia was present at the meeting, on March 22, 1919.

great. So it is a proof that a meeting took place. It is proof of many other things. This is all true. Good!

It also proves that the displacement of Palestinians had taken place earlier and so on.

Absolutely. It says that explicitly -- last three lines before section 2. Were these the claims that you were trying to substantiate?