You're going into an unnecessary position in which a majority of Republicans support.specifics matter and you arent being specific enough and if it gives libs even one word to latch onto they can control it as a false narrative,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're going into an unnecessary position in which a majority of Republicans support.specifics matter and you arent being specific enough and if it gives libs even one word to latch onto they can control it as a false narrative,,
It's the same outcome .. each congressional district is based on the majority vote. Sir .. you're arguing against a viewpoint that aligns with your narrative.
ARTHUR: Not another shrubbery!That's an improvement, though I think 15-29 would be better, and a tiered system to handle the greater caseload, to remove the burden of the shadow docket which is now taking too many cases.
explain how being specific is wrong??You're going into an unnecessary position in which a majority of Republicans support.
Actually I see a proposal to return the justices to overseeing only one circuit at a time, like in the old days.So Biden gets to add 4 justices to the Supreme Court. He loses in 2024 to Trump or DeSantis. The Republicans add 6 justices to the Supreme Court. Now we have 19 Justices.
In a couple of decades we have a Supreme Court with 100 justices. We have to build a new building to hold all the justices.
Perhaps Democrats shouldn’t have picked Hillary to run against Trump. Elections have consequences.
Unfortunately, this is a process that liberal states have employed to give all the electoral votes to the president with the popular vote. This includes states like Maryland, who would give all their electoral votes to Republicans if a Republican candidate were to win and / or strip the people if they voted overwhelmingly for a candidate who didn't receive the popular vote. If Maryland voted 100% for Joe Biden, yet Donald Trump won the popular vote, all those Democrat votes would go for Donald Trump.States are free to divvy their electors.
What they are not free to do is the latest leftoid scheme of giving their electors to whoever receives the most popular votes, in spite of how their state votes.
IOW, candidate 'A' wins in, say, RI, but candidate 'B' wins more of the popular vote nationwide, so RI gives its electors to 'B' despite the majority of its people having voted for 'A'.
you haven't backed up your initial claims' no state has enacted any law that restricts voting to ant minority at all and you can not cite one that does. No one gerrymandered the Senate and no one gerrymandered the Presidental races. There is not minority rule at all the majority of states elect a President it does not matter if several states have extra millions of liberals in them, they don't count outside their individual state. The popular vote is IRRELEVANT in Presidental elections always has been always will be.Read the rules, no ad homs. Back up your claims, or offer a solid path of reasoning. You haven't.
No, one judicial philosophy on the court is a kind of judicial tyranny.
You have no clue as to how to debate. vacuous claims are not an argument. Read the rules set forth in the OP.
2 states split based on congressional districts. For president.Like whom? and for what political nominees?
Yeah, vacuous claim, you're into tyranny, I get it. Well, I"m not, neither is the electorate. Even among conservatives, I do not know any that believe you are right.you provided it several times,, I have had them removed because of that,, guess the rules for libs are different than everyone else,,
why would I go to a cult meeting and try and convert them??
fact remains we are a constitutiona republic and not any of the things you keep claiming and because of that only constitutional cons should be on any court more so with SCOTUS..
The word 'democracy' is not in the Constitution. We are NOT a democracy, we are a representative Republic.
a democracy is a broad term that covers several types of governments,,You are wrong, but not just wrong, your wrongness is like, epic. I mean, I've got buckets of sources, the Britannica, you name it, which proves you are wrong. You've been listening to the right wing echo chamber for way too long.
In my entire life, throughout college, at ever level prior to it, (we were taught civics in the 60s) no one, not one professor, teacher, aide, whatever, no one EVER claimed 'American was not a democracy', over and over and over again, it was told, we were told, it was written, and spoken by Republicans and Democrats, Liberals and Conservatives, that AMerica is a democracy. And no one nitpicked on the parochial use ot the term in the Federalist papers.
I've been witnessing this since it started happening. And do you want to know when they started with this delusion? They started hollering 'America is not a democracy' round about the time Republicans starting losing the popular vote.
Bingo!
They can't stand democracy because democracy, it seems, of late, can't stand them.
of course they are different,, one has a constitution that dictates and restrict what the government can do and the other doesnt,,A representative democracy is a democracy of a certain type. The terms 'constitutional republic' and representative democracy are not mutually exclusive terms. You are letting semantics obfuscate reality.
DumpHole knows that. But he is very hostile to the truth.a democracy is a broad term that covers several types of governments,,
and since a constitutional republic is almost on the opposite side of the scale as a true democracy,, its nothing more than gaslighting to outright dishonest to argue such a simple yet clear difference,,,
we are a constitutional republic and the left doesnt want to mention that so its easier to deceive the simple minded and push true democracy using progressive tactics,, biggest one being racism and the gay agenda,,
A representative democracy is a democracy of a certain type. The terms 'constitutional republic' and representative democracy are not mutually exclusive terms. You are letting semantics obfuscate reality.
Nah, nothing to worry your tiny head. Thom's just an old scholar.is this one of the sources for the thought of the day and daily leftist talking points??
IMO... We have enough talent on the court now. Keep it at 9 but set a maximum age. I say 75.
beings we are not a democracy your idea flops in concept and application,,
No. It doesn’t.I disagree.
While it is true we are not a democracy, a larger SCOTUS is not a direct democracy either, but would better represent the views of the nation and population.
Right now the SCOTUS represents an extreme religious minority.