Supreme Court Oral Arguments in the Birthright Citizenship Case

No I did not. Thats fucked up thoughts entirely in your own head. Seek help!

No, bro. I planted that bug in your head because that was the response you thoroughly expected.

You know nothing about me. I'm not the one who's gonna deny your accusations because I know that nothing I could say or do would convince you otherwise. Therefore I feed off your inner fears, magnify them, and give them right back to you.

Fun, ain't it?:laughing0301:
 
Birthright citizenship is likely going to go Trump's way.

I was listening to the oral arguments today....
And the arguments and reasoning behind this illegal alien citizenship baby working is seriously flawed and the Justices pointed out the serious flaws during the oral arguments despite Ketenji's ridiculous comments.

I'm predicting no more anchor babies. Especially considering the commentary by the framers and the repudiation of future crime stated by Sotomayor.

Now, considering that the Southern Border has become a political football of late....

This will mostly cement it to some degree for a while.
 
Not sure what you are saying here
Wong Ark parents came to the US like everyone else, there were no legals or illegals at the time from my understanding....

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, barred Chinese people from becoming naturalized citizens, including his parents...one of the arguments against him being let back in to his U.S. domicile, and not being a citizen was tied to his parents being barred from citizenship under law because they were subjects of the Chinese emperor, and him being their child was subject to the emperor as well....

His parents did not permanently stay in their U.S. domicile, they returned home to China about 5 years before this Wong Kim Ark attempted to leave and reenter in 1895...leaving was fine, but re-entering he was stopped.

Bottom line, he was a US Citizen because he was born here, regardless of Chinese immigrants like his parents being barred from becoming naturalized citizens.
 
Birthright citizenship is likely going to go Trump's way.

I was listening to the oral arguments today....
And the arguments and reasoning behind this illegal alien citizenship baby working is seriously flawed and the Justices pointed out the serious flaws during the oral arguments despite Ketenji's ridiculous comments.

I'm predicting no more anchor babies. Especially considering the commentary by the framers and the repudiation of future crime stated by Sotomayor.

Now, considering that the Southern Border has become a political football of late....

This will mostly cement it to some degree for a while.
Hmmmm, from listening to it, I think it could be a 7 to 2, or an 8 to 1 decision against Trump's stance and for, birthright citizenship.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom