So Now Democrats Admit Trump Had A Point

[Independent thinker]

Politicians in both parties have long sought loopholes, vagueness, and ambiguities to override legislation, including election laws. By passing ECA reform, democrats are admitting that the very center of Trump's bid to "overturn the election results" was indeed a loophole in the law, a vagueness in the law, and an ambiguity is the law. Democrats are just jealous that Trump uncovered it and tried to take advantage of it. But, even though democrats now admit all of this, it's still full steam ahead in going after Trump with their kangaroo hearings.

Senators reach deal to clarify 1887 law at center of Jan. 6 attempt to overturn election

The ambiguous 19th century law

The senators hope to address the apparent loopholes and vagueness in the bill

The bipartisan group of 16 senators, nine Republicans and seven Democrats, led by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and including Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a joint statement, "From the beginning, our bipartisan group has shared a vision of drafting legislation to fix the flaws of the archaic and ambiguous Electoral Count Act of 1887. Through numerous meetings and debates among our colleagues as well as conversations with a wide variety of election experts and legal scholars, we have developed legislation that establishes clear guidelines for our system of certifying and counting electoral votes for President and Vice President. We urge our colleagues in both parties to support these simple, commonsense reforms."

Senators reach deal to clarify 1887 law at center of Jan. 6 attempt to overturn election

As the House committee probing the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol continues to reveal how it says then-President Donald Trump and his allies worked to overturn the 2020 election, a bipartisan group of senators has quietly reached agreement on a sweeping effort to overhaul the very law at the heart...

www.yahoo.com

 

[pknopp]

Trump wanted to over turn a valid election. If you want to claim that a valid point, have at it.

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats should pass a law allowing the Vice President to overturn the EVs of the state

Kamala Harris would love it

 

[theHawk]

Trump wanted to over turn a valid election. If you want to claim that a valid point, have at it.

It wasn’t valid. Should there be a way to challenge a corrupt election or not? Dems/RINOs want to make sure there isn’t. I wonder why.

 

[pknopp]

It wasn’t valid. Should there be a way to challenge a corrupt election or not? Dems/RINOs want to make sure there isn’t. I wonder why.

There is a way.......there has been audits after audits and lawsuits after lawsuits all resulting in nothing.

 

[Flash]

The problem we had in 2020 when the Democrats stole the election was that there was a rush to certify before any meaningful investigation of the fraud took place.

That is why Pence should have ordered an audit of the contested Democrat districts where the fraud took place.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Democrats should pass a law allowing the Vice President to overturn the EVs of the state

Kamala Harris would love it

Yeah, that's really saving Democracy, Jesus you commies are so transparent. Don't ever talk about democracy again.

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah, that's really saving Democracy, Jesus you commies are so transparent. Don't ever talk about democracy again.

Trump says Kamala Harris has the power to overturn elections she doesn’t like

Why would Democrats want to change that?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Trump says Kamala Harris has the power to overturn elections she doesn’t like

Why would Democrats want to change that?

Becasue you think it's undemocratitc right? So of course to save democracy.....

 

[Billy000]

Politicians in both parties have long sought loopholes, vagueness, and ambiguities to override legislation, including election laws. By passing ECA reform, democrats are admitting that the very center of Trump's bid to "overturn the election results" was indeed a loophole in the law, a vagueness in the law, and an ambiguity is the law. Democrats are just jealous that Trump uncovered it and tried to take advantage of it. But, even though democrats now admit all of this, it's still full steam ahead in going after Trump with their kangaroo hearings.

Senators reach deal to clarify 1887 law at center of Jan. 6 attempt to overturn election

The ambiguous 19th century law

The senators hope to address the apparent loopholes and vagueness in the bill

The bipartisan group of 16 senators, nine Republicans and seven Democrats, led by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and including Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a joint statement, "From the beginning, our bipartisan group has shared a vision of drafting legislation to fix the flaws of the archaic and ambiguous Electoral Count Act of 1887. Through numerous meetings and debates among our colleagues as well as conversations with a wide variety of election experts and legal scholars, we have developed legislation that establishes clear guidelines for our system of certifying and counting electoral votes for President and Vice President. We urge our colleagues in both parties to support these simple, commonsense reforms."

Senators reach deal to clarify 1887 law at center of Jan. 6 attempt to overturn election

As the House committee probing the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol continues to reveal how it says then-President Donald Trump and his allies worked to overturn the 2020 election, a bipartisan group of senators has quietly reached agreement on a sweeping effort to overhaul the very law at the heart...

www.yahoo.com

Trump’s dumbass did not know jack shit about any sort of old law or how it is interpreted. All that mattered to him was remaining president. That’s it. That was his whole goal. He’s too fucking stupid for any meaningful commentary on how law and precedents work lol

 

[22lcidw]

Trump wanted to over turn a valid election. If you want to claim that a valid point, have at it.

Progs cheated. Globalist enabled.

 

[Billy000]

Politicians in both parties have long sought loopholes, vagueness, and ambiguities to override legislation, including election laws. By passing ECA reform, democrats are admitting that the very center of Trump's bid to "overturn the election results" was indeed a loophole in the law, a vagueness in the law, and an ambiguity is the law. Democrats are just jealous that Trump uncovered it and tried to take advantage of it. But, even though democrats now admit all of this, it's still full steam ahead in going after Trump with their kangaroo hearings.

Senators reach deal to clarify 1887 law at center of Jan. 6 attempt to overturn election

The ambiguous 19th century law

The senators hope to address the apparent loopholes and vagueness in the bill

The bipartisan group of 16 senators, nine Republicans and seven Democrats, led by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and including Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a joint statement, "From the beginning, our bipartisan group has shared a vision of drafting legislation to fix the flaws of the archaic and ambiguous Electoral Count Act of 1887. Through numerous meetings and debates among our colleagues as well as conversations with a wide variety of election experts and legal scholars, we have developed legislation that establishes clear guidelines for our system of certifying and counting electoral votes for President and Vice President. We urge our colleagues in both parties to support these simple, commonsense reforms."

Senators reach deal to clarify 1887 law at center of Jan. 6 attempt to overturn election

As the House committee probing the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol continues to reveal how it says then-President Donald Trump and his allies worked to overturn the 2020 election, a bipartisan group of senators has quietly reached agreement on a sweeping effort to overhaul the very law at the heart...

www.yahoo.com

The ONLY reason democrats are observing this is keep morons like Trump from abusing the language. This shit is purely ceremonial. It would be like the presenter at the Oscars choosing to not say the winner of best actor. The actor still won either way lol

 

[buckeye45_73]

The ONLY reason democrats are observing this is keep morons like Trump from abusing the language. This shit is purely ceremonial. It would be like the presenter at the Oscars choosing to not say the winner of best actor. The actor still won either way lol

Abusing language from a left? Bwahahahahaahhaahahahahahahahahahahahahahah........but you're right the 1/6 committiee is purely ceremonial...
I

Trump’s dumbass did not know jack shit about any sort of old law or how it is interpreted. All that mattered to him was remaining president. That’s it. That was his whole goal. He’s too fucking stupid for any meaningful commentary on how law and precedents work lol

I love these takes. How is Trump a moron if he orchestrates these huge consipracies and is a threat to democracy?

 

[Independent thinker]

Trump’s dumbass did not know jack shit about any sort of old law or how it is interpreted. All that mattered to him was remaining president. That’s it. That was his whole goal. He’s too fucking stupid for any meaningful commentary on how law and precedents work lol

Like Democrats do, Trump thought he found a loophole and tried to take advantage of it. Just the fact that dems are now signing off on ECA reform is an acknowledgment that Trump did, in fact, find a vague loophole. So, the hearings are a bunch of bs because democrats acknowledge that the ECA was vague.

 

[Independent thinker]

The ONLY reason democrats are observing this is keep morons like Trump from abusing the language. This shit is purely ceremonial. It would be like the presenter at the Oscars choosing to not say the winner of best actor. The actor still won either way lol

There is no need to reform the ECA if it was cut and dry. The fact that they are signing off on reforming it is an admission that there was indeed, a loophole that could have been taken advantage of.

 

[Billy000]

Abusing language from a left? Bwahahahahaahhaahahahahahahahahahahahahahah........but you're right the 1/6 committiee is purely ceremonial...
I

I love these takes. How is Trump a moron if he orchestrates these huge consipracies and is a threat to democracy?

He makes a demand and the smarter people around him do the orchestrating. He’s too stupid for a bullet by bullet plan lol

 

[rightwinger]

Becasue you think it's undemocratitc right? So of course to save democracy.....

So Bucky…

Are you claiming Pence had the power to overturn the states or not?

 

[theHawk]

There is a way.......there has been audits after audits and lawsuits after lawsuits all resulting in nothing.

Nothing? The audits have found numerous instances of rules being broken. Now state supreme courts have ruled that election laws were broken.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nothing? The audits have found numerous instances of rules being broken. Now state supreme courts have ruled that election laws were broken.

No election law was broken during the election in Wi.

The VP never had the power to raise an objection on his own during the counting of the States votes.

 

[buckeye45_73]

So Bucky…

Are you claiming Pence had the power to overturn the states or not?

No he didnt........