Fani Willis Forced To Release All Communications With Jack Smith, J6 Committee

[westwall]

I've always wondered about stuff like this. So she is ordered to release communications. Who's to say she hadn't destroyed much of those communicatins?

Would anyone ever know?

Yeah, they would.

 

[hadit]

I've always wondered about stuff like this. So she is ordered to release communications. Who's to say she hadn't destroyed much of those communicatins?

Would anyone ever know?

Someone would know, yes, and in this day of digital record keeping, any half competent IT department would have backup tapes stored offsite, ready to be restored and all communication records be available. She would have to convince a bunch of IT nerds that they would be better served losing their jobs than for crossing her and coughing up the data.

Reminder, any time you hear an official saying they don't have the records, check to see if any IT guys get fired and/or prosecuted. If not, the official is probably lying, because one of the fastest ways to lose an IT job is to be responsible for backups and not having any.

 

[justoffal]

We shall get to see what they were up to. Conspiracy comes to mind. Conspiring against Donald Trump, and against others.

Heck, Biden blasted his own DOJ in his pardon message for his son, Hunter.

​

The Fulton County Superior Court has ruled against District Attorney Fani Willis, ordering her to disclose communications with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The decision, announced on Tuesday, follows a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, which accused Willis of violating Georgia’s Open Records Act.​

​

The court’s order grants Judicial Watch’s motion for default judgment, directing Willis to search for and release any non-exempt records within five business days. Additionally, the court awarded attorneys’ fees to Judicial Watch, citing Willis’s failure to meet legal requirements for responding to the records request.​

​

The lawsuit stems from a request made by Judicial Watch in August 2023 for all documents and communications between Willis, her office, and Special Counsel Jack Smith, as well as with the House January 6 Committee. Initially, Willis’s office claimed no such records existed. Judicial Watch countered with legal action in March 2024, asserting that Willis’s office failed to produce documents it likely possessed.​

​

Court records reveal that the case encountered procedural hiccups, including confusion over the filing of service documents. Willis’s legal team argued that delays in the court’s electronic docket system caused her office to miss deadlines. However, the court determined that these technical issues did not excuse Willis from her legal obligations.​

​

Judge Robert McBurney found Willis in default, citing her failure to respond in a timely manner. The ruling noted that Willis could have moved to address the default or presented a defense but did neither. Instead, her office argued procedural points that the court ultimately dismissed.​

​

“Plaintiff has established that Defendant violated the Open Records Act by failing to either turn over responsive records or notify Plaintiff of her decision to withhold some or all such records,” the court stated in its order.​

​

The judgment compels Willis to conduct a “diligent search” for records related to Judicial Watch’s request. If any materials are withheld, the court mandates an explanation under Georgia’s open records laws. A hearing on attorneys’ fees is scheduled for December 20.​

​

The ruling arrives at a time of heightened scrutiny on Willis, who leads the high-profile case against former President and President-elect Donald Trump, and others tied to efforts to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election results.​

​

“Fani Willis is something else,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “We’ve been doing this work for 30 years, and this is the first time in our experience a government official has been found in default for not showing up in court to answer an open records lawsuit.”​

​

...​

JUST IN: Fani Willis Forced To Release All Communications With Jack Smith, J6 Committee

The Fulton County Superior Court has ruled against District Attorney Fani Willis, ordering her to disclose communications with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The decision, announced on Tuesday, follows a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog...

trendingpoliticsnews.com

Boy this just gets worse and worse.... You have to wonder how many people are going to get pulled into this. What a stupid idea for her to be communicating with Jack Smith. Was the judge Tanya Chutkin in the loop also? And now you have to wonder about AG James in New York.... Were they having tea three times a week with all the other prosecutors in unrelated cases? This thing has the potential to really stink.

 

[justoffal]

Someone would know, yes, and in this day of digital record keeping, any half competent IT department would have backup tapes stored offsite, ready to be restored and all communication records be available. She would have to convince a bunch of IT nerds that they would be better served losing their jobs than for crossing her and coughing up the data.

Reminder, any time you hear an official saying they don't have the records, check to see if any IT guys get fired and/or prosecuted. If not, the official is probably lying, because one of the fastest ways to lose an IT job is to be responsible for backups and not having any.

Don't forget every single bit and byte of information is stored in Nevada... Every phone call, every email, every political post, every keystroke is recorded in the metadata Banks. Hillary's emails are there...
Though it would take an act of God to get them out.

You can barely fight nowadays without creating a permanent digital footprint.

 

[hadit]

Don't forget every single bit and byte of information is stored in Nevada... Every phone call, every email, every political post, every keystroke is recorded in the metadata Banks. Hillary's emails are there...
Though it would take an act of God to get them out.

You can barely fight nowadays without creating a permanent digital footprint.

That is why I LOL'd when Lois Lerner claimed they "lost" all those emails that just coincidently were vital to a court case. AFAIK, no IT guy lost his job because he couldn't produce a backup.

 

[SweetTea]

To Democrats, the ends always justify the means. Every bit of lawfare could be completely and undeniably exposed and Democrats would continue to vote for Democrats. They simply don't care.

 

[justoffal]

That is why I LOL'd when Lois Lerner claimed they "lost" all those emails that just coincidently were vital to a court case. AFAIK, no IT guy lost his job because he couldn't produce a backup.

For the past 7 years every phone call, every email, every keystroke is captured and recorded.
Anyone who says something is lost already knows that they are lying.

 

[hadit]

For the past 7 years every phone call, every email, every keystroke is captured and recorded.
Anyone who says something is lost already knows that they are lying.

It doesn't even have to go to the fed's repository. All IT departments do backups, and not having a needed backup is a good way for an IT guy to get fired, it's so basic.

 

[justoffal]

It doesn't even have to go to the fed's repository. All IT departments do backups, and not having a needed backup is a good way for an IT guy to get fired, it's so basic.

Having said that anyone who knows about the repository in Nevada knows that all records are now permanent and non erasible. That facility is so large that it has its own 70 megawatt power plant just power the server bank.... 70 megawatts is larger than what some cities use.