Sen. Blumenthal makes threats on Senate floor if ACB is confirmed to SC.

[Faun]

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

Most illegals vote Democrap.
Most perverts vote Democrap
Most dead people vote Democrap.

There fixed it for you.

I like the guy in the *** S&M outfit calling someone crazy, LOL

LOL

Your homo-erotic fantasies are noted and laughed at.

 

[Zorro!]

Faun the angry little boy: Biden would have confirmed a Republican AFTER the election, kaz! He would he would he would! {kicks and screams, falls on the floor, rolls in circles} He would he would he would!

Seriously? How old are you?

LOL

You poor thing, you just can't stop kazzing, can ya?

No, I didn't say Biden would have confirmed a Republican after the election had Bush lost. He wouldn't have.

​

According to Biden, they would have held hearings after the election. Doesn't mean they would have confirmed them, but he said they would hold them.

Yes Kaz lied, but he couldn't even find the issue. The issue is that RBG said she'd have retired in 2014 but McConnell wouldn't have confirmed an Obama nomination in 15. The Ghoul's seating Barrett pretty much proves that to anyone who actually thought RBG didn't understand McConnell.

If Obama had appointed her replacement in 2014, McConnell could not have stopped her being confirmed by the Democrat majority, in 2014.

But, now we have ACB and she's awesome! The majority of Americans supported her confirmation before the election. Win/Win/Win!

RBG---in the end, screwed the democrat party over BIG TIME!!!! Thank you RUTHIE BABY------------

Yes, she certainly did. She was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2009 when Democrats controlled the Senate and White House.

She took over for the conservative justice, Byron White, and she could have retired in her 80's and been replaced by Obama and the Dingy Harry Senate, but, she believed the lies that once the Left wins, they never lose again.... oops! And now the Conservatives have regained this once conservative seat on the Supreme Court.

And a Judicial Conservative is much different than a Political Conservative. A Judicial Conservative simply sticks to adjudication and leaves legislation to the legislators. If makes me laugh to watch all these legislators howling that adjudicators will no longer being doing their work for them. If they want different laws, then why don't they just pass them?

 

[Zorro!]

Faun the angry little boy: Biden would have confirmed a Republican AFTER the election, kaz! He would he would he would! {kicks and screams, falls on the floor, rolls in circles} He would he would he would!

Seriously? How old are you?

LOL

You poor thing, you just can't stop kazzing, can ya?

No, I didn't say Biden would have confirmed a Republican after the election had Bush lost. He wouldn't have.

​

According to Biden, they would have held hearings after the election. Doesn't mean they would have confirmed them, but he said they would hold them.

Yes Kaz lied, but he couldn't even find the issue. The issue is that RBG said she'd have retired in 2014 but McConnell wouldn't have confirmed an Obama nomination in 15. The Ghoul's seating Barrett pretty much proves that to anyone who actually thought RBG didn't understand McConnell.

If Obama had appointed her replacement in 2014, McConnell could not have stopped her being confirmed by the Democrat majority, in 2014.

But, now we have ACB and she's awesome! The majority of Americans supported her confirmation before the election. Win/Win/Win!

RBG---in the end, screwed the democrat party over BIG TIME!!!! Thank you RUTHIE BABY------------

May she rest in peace knowing that a STRONG INTELLIGENT woman now holds the seat she one held.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Faun the angry little boy: Biden would have confirmed a Republican AFTER the election, kaz! He would he would he would! {kicks and screams, falls on the floor, rolls in circles} He would he would he would!

Seriously? How old are you?

LOL

You poor thing, you just can't stop kazzing, can ya?

No, I didn't say Biden would have confirmed a Republican after the election had Bush lost. He wouldn't have.

​

According to Biden, they would have held hearings after the election. Doesn't mean they would have confirmed them, but he said they would hold them.

Yes Kaz lied, but he couldn't even find the issue. The issue is that RBG said she'd have retired in 2014 but McConnell wouldn't have confirmed an Obama nomination in 15. The Ghoul's seating Barrett pretty much proves that to anyone who actually thought RBG didn't understand McConnell.

If Obama had appointed her replacement in 2014, McConnell could not have stopped her being confirmed by the Democrat majority, in 2014.

But, now we have ACB and she's awesome! The majority of Americans supported her confirmation before the election. Win/Win/Win!

RBG---in the end, screwed the democrat party over BIG TIME!!!! Thank you RUTHIE BABY------------

Yes, she certainly did. She was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2009 when Democrats controlled the Senate and White House.

Yeah, but she wanted it to be some big "statement" by having her replacement nominated by a woman President. Too bad for her that the United States didn't really give a shit about her priorities.

 

[kaz]

Everything in life has Consequences

Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster

Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans

Why not win the Senate and the White House and do it like Republicans did?

It can happen.

Then what about all those new precedents you lot set?

Like the judicial filibuster? No wait, that was you.
Ending the judicial filibuster? Oh, you again.

Why do you deliberately omit stuff?

Who ended the SCOTUS filibuster?

WHO blocked want was normally a pretty routine Presidential right to fill judicial vacancies in order to "save them" for their team (and no, I don't mean voting DOWN applicants).

WHO made up a new rule to prevent a president from filling a vacancy before an election?

and WHO reversed that rule 2 weeks before an election?

Those are MAJOR precedents and don't deny it. You know. If they weren't that made up rule would have held for 2020 instead of creating yet another precedent.

SO why shouldn't the Dems pack the court given YOUR behavior?

It's very simple. Win the Senate and the White House. Duh!

So you'll be fine with it if they win it and do that? There has already been a lot of whining from you guys about the possibility.

Bad ideas are still bad ideas.

You can't name anything they did out of order or against the constitutional process.

Yet, the Rs did something wrong.

You not liking it doesn't make it wrong.

Coyote also can't list a single time Democrats didn't confirm a Democrat scotus pick and waited for an election as she demands the Republicans do

Dems never refused to fill a seat in an election year (10 months away) and then filled a seat days before the election when it favored them

Exactly...Kaz seems to miss that. The Dems didn’t invent and disinvent new rules.

Coyote: "The Dems didn’t invent and disinvent new rules."



Democrats
- Said no Republican nominations with a Democrat Senate in an election year (Biden)
- Created the judicial filibuster under W
- Created the administration nomination filibuster under W
- Created the SCOTUS filibuster under W
- Were the only party to try to filibuster SCOTUS nominations - Rehnquist (chief), Alito and Gorsuch - The only times it was ever attempted were by Democrats
- Changed the rules to implement Obamacare despite losing their filibuster proof majority because of Scott Brown
- Eliminated the judicial filibuster under O
- Eliminated the administration nomination filibuster under O

Republicans
- Eliminated the SCOTUS filibuster under Trump

"Said no Republican nominations with a Democrat Senate in an election year (Biden)"

That's as far as I got to see you're just kazzing again.

As you yourself showed when you posted Biden's quote, Biden never said that.

I didn't say it was a quote, government educated failure

Quoting, Paraphrasing, & Summarizing | UAGC Writing Center

writingcenter.ashford.edu

And you must've been home schooled as I didn't say that was a quote. I said the Biden quote you posted reveals he never said there would be "no Republican nominations with a Democrat Senate in an election year." Sadly, you're a pathological kazzer, so you're kazzing again.

OK, angry little tyke. Being a butt hole really appeals to you, huh?

 

[kaz]

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

Most illegals vote Democrap.
Most perverts vote Democrap
Most dead people vote Democrap.

There fixed it for you.

I like the guy in the *** S&M outfit calling someone crazy, LOL

LOL

Your homo-erotic fantasies are noted and laughed at.

You're the one in the queer sex suit

 

[iceberg]

Everything in life has Consequences

Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster

Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans

Why not win the Senate and the White House and do it like Republicans did?

It can happen.

Then what about all those new precedents you lot set?

Like the judicial filibuster? No wait, that was you.
Ending the judicial filibuster? Oh, you again.

Why do you deliberately omit stuff?

Who ended the SCOTUS filibuster?

WHO blocked want was normally a pretty routine Presidential right to fill judicial vacancies in order to "save them" for their team (and no, I don't mean voting DOWN applicants).

WHO made up a new rule to prevent a president from filling a vacancy before an election?

and WHO reversed that rule 2 weeks before an election?

Those are MAJOR precedents and don't deny it. You know. If they weren't that made up rule would have held for 2020 instead of creating yet another precedent.

SO why shouldn't the Dems pack the court given YOUR behavior?

It's very simple. Win the Senate and the White House. Duh!

So you'll be fine with it if they win it and do that? There has already been a lot of whining from you guys about the possibility.

Bad ideas are still bad ideas.

You can't name anything they did out of order or against the constitutional process.

Yet, the Rs did something wrong.

You not liking it doesn't make it wrong.

Coyote also can't list a single time Democrats didn't confirm a Democrat scotus pick and waited for an election as she demands the Republicans do

Dems never refused to fill a seat in an election year (10 months away) and then filled a seat days before the election when it favored them

They never had the chance. If the roles were reversed there is no doubt Chucky would to exactly what Mitch is doing.............so grow the **** up and accept reality for once in your pathetic life.

OK

And if the roles were reversed, Mitch would not hesitate to pack the court

Agree?

Stacking the court isn't what you think it is. You think that you stack the court, you win, it's over.

You only win until Republicans are back in charge, then they stack it back. Then you do. Then they do ...

This isn't the permanent takeover of the court you idiots think it is. You really don't grasp that, do you? You think the court is yours now

this is what cracks me up the most - they think if they do something clever the right will go "darn it, foiled by their genius" when in fact, they threaten to do something stupid, they do it also. stop doing stupid shit and making stupid threats and this gets a whole lot better for all of us.

 

[eagle1462010]

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

Most illegals vote Democrap.
Most perverts vote Democrap
Most dead people vote Democrap.

There fixed it for you.

I like the guy in the *** S&M outfit calling someone crazy, LOL

LOL

Your homo-erotic fantasies are noted and laughed at.

You're the one in the queer sex suit

I'm glad I have that moron on iggy

 

[kaz]

Faun the angry little boy: Biden would have confirmed a Republican AFTER the election, kaz! He would he would he would! {kicks and screams, falls on the floor, rolls in circles} He would he would he would!

Seriously? How old are you?

LOL

You poor thing, you just can't stop kazzing, can ya?

No, I didn't say Biden would have confirmed a Republican after the election had Bush lost. He wouldn't have.

​

According to Biden, they would have held hearings after the election. Doesn't mean they would have confirmed them, but he said they would hold them.

Yes Kaz lied, but he couldn't even find the issue. The issue is that RBG said she'd have retired in 2014 but McConnell wouldn't have confirmed an Obama nomination in 15. The Ghoul's seating Barrett pretty much proves that to anyone who actually thought RBG didn't understand McConnell.

If Obama had appointed her replacement in 2014, McConnell could not have stopped her being confirmed by the Democrat majority, in 2014.

But, now we have ACB and she's awesome! The majority of Americans supported her confirmation before the election. Win/Win/Win!

RBG---in the end, screwed the democrat party over BIG TIME!!!! Thank you RUTHIE BABY------------

Yes, she certainly did. She was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2009 when Democrats controlled the Senate and White House.

Yeah, but she wanted it to be some big "statement" by having her replacement nominated by a woman President. Too bad for her that the United States didn't really give a shit about her priorities.

Ginsburg also opposed stacking the court and Democrats are already planning to shit on her grave. They only care what she wanted when it's what they want

 

[Faun]

Elections have consequences.

If Trump wins and Republicans retain control of the Senate we can pack the court and Dems won't oppose it?

They will need the House also

If Dems take all three, why should they not use their power?

Because it would be stupid and appear to the centrists to be a open move to grasp political power at any cost. That would cost the Democrats in the next election in 2022.

You think appointing Barrett doesn't look like an open move to grasp political power?

It looks like another HUGE win for president Trump to me!

What did Trump do?

McConnell blocked Obama from filling seats and then packed the courts with young Conservatives

Didn't block anything. Just didn't call a vote. His right.

And it will be the Democrat's right to add more members to the court.

That is a horrible idea, no natter which side does it.
I can’t stress that enough.

McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea. Now that your party set the precedent, it's a little late for you to start whining about what your party set in motion.

McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea.

How many did he block?

Now that your party set the precedent,

You think 2015-2016 was the first time a Senate controlled by an opposing party has left some
court seats open at the end of a President's term? LOL!

They just don’t seem to get it.
Then they take their perceived slight, and think “well then we will do this!” And plan to do something incredibly stupid (pack the court.
Despite me saying repeatedly that I would be opposed to anyone doing it, and telling them it’s an absolutely horrible road to go down, they keep responding like bitter little partisans.
Hey clowns, ITS A HORRIBLE IDEA NO MATTER WHO DOES IT!!!

it's a demofk threat and only a demofk threat. stop with the both party shit. The GOP never ever did what the demofks do. never ever. The demofks created the nuclear option in the Senate. Not the republicans. Ending filibustering was the demofks, not the republicans, and now they are threatening this. It is always a threat from the demofks. Alwys

Mitch turned the filibuster from a rarely used tool to a constant 60 vote requirement

That’s how it works when the majority party won’t compromise with the minority party. The filibuster was designed to force compromise rather than one party rule.

Thats what happens when you have minority rule.

The Republicans exist on minority rule in the Senate, House, White House and now the Courts

Democrats are also a minority party, Sport. Your command of the English language is as bad as the government that educated you

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

In the Senate, Dems control the big population states of California, NY and Illinois
Republicans counter with Wyoming and the Dakotas and get the same number of Senators

In the House, Republicans used the census of 2010 to Gerrymander représentation well in excess of the votes they received.

Of Course, Trump received 3 million fewer votes than Clinton

That is why Mitch McConnell is so intent on seizing the court system for a generation by packing it with young, unqualified Conservatives

More of your lies. Hillary didn't get a majority. Most Democrats don't. You're another government educated failure who literally doesn't know what the word "majority" means.

The country is split, independents are a large percent. Few candidates get a majority

Trump got 3 million fewer votes than Hillary.

Hillary didn't get a majority. The majority of voters voted "no" to Hillary. You went to a government school, didn't you?

Can't read? He didn't say Hillary got a majority. He said she got 3 million more votes than Trump.

 

[Faun]

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

Most illegals vote Democrap.
Most perverts vote Democrap
Most dead people vote Democrap.

There fixed it for you.

I like the guy in the *** S&M outfit calling someone crazy, LOL

LOL

Your homo-erotic fantasies are noted and laughed at.

You're the one in the queer sex suit

I'm glad I have that moron on iggy

Not many people openly admit they're a ***** like you just did. Kudos to you for your honesty.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Faun the angry little boy: Biden would have confirmed a Republican AFTER the election, kaz! He would he would he would! {kicks and screams, falls on the floor, rolls in circles} He would he would he would!

Seriously? How old are you?

LOL

You poor thing, you just can't stop kazzing, can ya?

No, I didn't say Biden would have confirmed a Republican after the election had Bush lost. He wouldn't have.

​

According to Biden, they would have held hearings after the election. Doesn't mean they would have confirmed them, but he said they would hold them.

Yes Kaz lied, but he couldn't even find the issue. The issue is that RBG said she'd have retired in 2014 but McConnell wouldn't have confirmed an Obama nomination in 15. The Ghoul's seating Barrett pretty much proves that to anyone who actually thought RBG didn't understand McConnell.

If Obama had appointed her replacement in 2014, McConnell could not have stopped her being confirmed by the Democrat majority, in 2014.

But, now we have ACB and she's awesome! The majority of Americans supported her confirmation before the election. Win/Win/Win!

RBG---in the end, screwed the democrat party over BIG TIME!!!! Thank you RUTHIE BABY------------

Yes, she certainly did. She was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2009 when Democrats controlled the Senate and White House.

She took over for the conservative justice, Byron White, and she could have retired in her 80's and been replaced by Obama and the Dingy Harry Senate, but, she believed the lies that once the Left wins, they never lose again.... oops! And now the Conservatives have regained this once conservative seat on the Supreme Court.

And a Judicial Conservative is much different than a Political Conservative. A Judicial Conservative simply sticks to adjudication and leaves legislation to the legislators. If makes me laugh to watch all these legislators howling that adjudicators will no longer being doing their work for them. If they want different laws, then why don't they just pass them?

Leftists never like any plan of action which requires them to convince people to agree with them, and allows other people the opportunity to say, "**** you, you crazy, evil bastards."

 

[kaz]

Elections have consequences.

If Trump wins and Republicans retain control of the Senate we can pack the court and Dems won't oppose it?

They will need the House also

If Dems take all three, why should they not use their power?

Because it would be stupid and appear to the centrists to be a open move to grasp political power at any cost. That would cost the Democrats in the next election in 2022.

You think appointing Barrett doesn't look like an open move to grasp political power?

It looks like another HUGE win for president Trump to me!

What did Trump do?

McConnell blocked Obama from filling seats and then packed the courts with young Conservatives

Didn't block anything. Just didn't call a vote. His right.

And it will be the Democrat's right to add more members to the court.

That is a horrible idea, no natter which side does it.
I can’t stress that enough.

McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea. Now that your party set the precedent, it's a little late for you to start whining about what your party set in motion.

McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea.

How many did he block?

Now that your party set the precedent,

You think 2015-2016 was the first time a Senate controlled by an opposing party has left some
court seats open at the end of a President's term? LOL!

They just don’t seem to get it.
Then they take their perceived slight, and think “well then we will do this!” And plan to do something incredibly stupid (pack the court.
Despite me saying repeatedly that I would be opposed to anyone doing it, and telling them it’s an absolutely horrible road to go down, they keep responding like bitter little partisans.
Hey clowns, ITS A HORRIBLE IDEA NO MATTER WHO DOES IT!!!

it's a demofk threat and only a demofk threat. stop with the both party shit. The GOP never ever did what the demofks do. never ever. The demofks created the nuclear option in the Senate. Not the republicans. Ending filibustering was the demofks, not the republicans, and now they are threatening this. It is always a threat from the demofks. Alwys

Mitch turned the filibuster from a rarely used tool to a constant 60 vote requirement

That’s how it works when the majority party won’t compromise with the minority party. The filibuster was designed to force compromise rather than one party rule.

Thats what happens when you have minority rule.

The Republicans exist on minority rule in the Senate, House, White House and now the Courts

Democrats are also a minority party, Sport. Your command of the English language is as bad as the government that educated you

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

In the Senate, Dems control the big population states of California, NY and Illinois
Republicans counter with Wyoming and the Dakotas and get the same number of Senators

In the House, Republicans used the census of 2010 to Gerrymander représentation well in excess of the votes they received.

Of Course, Trump received 3 million fewer votes than Clinton

That is why Mitch McConnell is so intent on seizing the court system for a generation by packing it with young, unqualified Conservatives

More of your lies. Hillary didn't get a majority. Most Democrats don't. You're another government educated failure who literally doesn't know what the word "majority" means.

The country is split, independents are a large percent. Few candidates get a majority

Trump got 3 million fewer votes than Hillary.

Hillary didn't get a majority. The majority of voters voted "no" to Hillary. You went to a government school, didn't you?

Can't read? He didn't say Hillary got a majority. He said she got 3 million more votes than Trump.

Most people voted "no" to Hillary. That she's the people's choice is the stupid that you people are, angry little tot.

Is Stewie actually based on you?

 

[BluesLegend]

He said she got 3 million more votes than Trump.

Hillary got 4 million more votes than Trump in California. Trump whooped her ass by 1 million votes in the other 49 states.

 

[kaz]

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

Most illegals vote Democrap.
Most perverts vote Democrap
Most dead people vote Democrap.

There fixed it for you.

I like the guy in the *** S&M outfit calling someone crazy, LOL

LOL

Your homo-erotic fantasies are noted and laughed at.

You're the one in the queer sex suit

I'm glad I have that moron on iggy

Not many people openly admit they're a ***** like you just did. Kudos to you for your honesty.

Again, you chose the homosexual fantasy suit, not us

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is one of the core tenants of the country.

Tenants?

 

[BS Filter]

Elections have consequences.

If Trump wins and Republicans retain control of the Senate we can pack the court and Dems won't oppose it?

They will need the House also

If Dems take all three, why should they not use their power?

Because it would be stupid and appear to the centrists to be a open move to grasp political power at any cost. That would cost the Democrats in the next election in 2022.

You think appointing Barrett doesn't look like an open move to grasp political power?

It looks like another HUGE win for president Trump to me!

What did Trump do?

McConnell blocked Obama from filling seats and then packed the courts with young Conservatives

Didn't block anything. Just didn't call a vote. His right.

And it will be the Democrat's right to add more members to the court.

That is a horrible idea, no natter which side does it.
I can’t stress that enough.

McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea. Now that your party set the precedent, it's a little late for you to start whining about what your party set in motion.

McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea.

How many did he block?

Now that your party set the precedent,

You think 2015-2016 was the first time a Senate controlled by an opposing party has left some
court seats open at the end of a President's term? LOL!

They just don’t seem to get it.
Then they take their perceived slight, and think “well then we will do this!” And plan to do something incredibly stupid (pack the court.
Despite me saying repeatedly that I would be opposed to anyone doing it, and telling them it’s an absolutely horrible road to go down, they keep responding like bitter little partisans.
Hey clowns, ITS A HORRIBLE IDEA NO MATTER WHO DOES IT!!!

it's a demofk threat and only a demofk threat. stop with the both party shit. The GOP never ever did what the demofks do. never ever. The demofks created the nuclear option in the Senate. Not the republicans. Ending filibustering was the demofks, not the republicans, and now they are threatening this. It is always a threat from the demofks. Alwys

Mitch turned the filibuster from a rarely used tool to a constant 60 vote requirement

That’s how it works when the majority party won’t compromise with the minority party. The filibuster was designed to force compromise rather than one party rule.

Thats what happens when you have minority rule.

The Republicans exist on minority rule in the Senate, House, White House and now the Courts

Democrats are also a minority party, Sport. Your command of the English language is as bad as the government that educated you

Republicans are the minority party, Sport. The Senators who voted for ACB represent 13.5 million FEWER voters that the Senators who voted against her. Republicans have been the minority party for years, winning the House with consistently fewer votes than Democrats. Trump lost the popular vote.

The packing of the courts will be undone. There won't be enough Republicans left to stop them after this election.

You get more deranged every day. There is no "packing", even the Dems have dropped that stupid talking point. What is your obsession with the "popular vote"? It means nothing in the United States.

The will of the people does mean something in the U.S. They weren't capable of counting the popular vote, so the electoral college was in the constitution, but it was never meant to override the will of the people. Since 1864, the first year popular vote was recorded, that fluke has only appeared 5 times.

Sorry son, we don't elect Presidents by the "popular vote". Stop crying, it just is what it is.

We all know the procedures for a presidential election dumb ass, but The will of the people does mean something in the U.S. It is one of the core tenants of the country.

Tell us how many Presidents have been elected officially by the popular vote. Go ahead.

 

[Faun]

Everything in life has Consequences

Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster

Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans

Why not win the Senate and the White House and do it like Republicans did?

It can happen.

Then what about all those new precedents you lot set?

Like the judicial filibuster? No wait, that was you.
Ending the judicial filibuster? Oh, you again.

Why do you deliberately omit stuff?

Who ended the SCOTUS filibuster?

WHO blocked want was normally a pretty routine Presidential right to fill judicial vacancies in order to "save them" for their team (and no, I don't mean voting DOWN applicants).

WHO made up a new rule to prevent a president from filling a vacancy before an election?

and WHO reversed that rule 2 weeks before an election?

Those are MAJOR precedents and don't deny it. You know. If they weren't that made up rule would have held for 2020 instead of creating yet another precedent.

SO why shouldn't the Dems pack the court given YOUR behavior?

It's very simple. Win the Senate and the White House. Duh!

So you'll be fine with it if they win it and do that? There has already been a lot of whining from you guys about the possibility.

Bad ideas are still bad ideas.

You can't name anything they did out of order or against the constitutional process.

Yet, the Rs did something wrong.

You not liking it doesn't make it wrong.

Coyote also can't list a single time Democrats didn't confirm a Democrat scotus pick and waited for an election as she demands the Republicans do

Dems never refused to fill a seat in an election year (10 months away) and then filled a seat days before the election when it favored them

Exactly...Kaz seems to miss that. The Dems didn’t invent and disinvent new rules.

Coyote: "The Dems didn’t invent and disinvent new rules."



Democrats
- Said no Republican nominations with a Democrat Senate in an election year (Biden)
- Created the judicial filibuster under W
- Created the administration nomination filibuster under W
- Created the SCOTUS filibuster under W
- Were the only party to try to filibuster SCOTUS nominations - Rehnquist (chief), Alito and Gorsuch - The only times it was ever attempted were by Democrats
- Changed the rules to implement Obamacare despite losing their filibuster proof majority because of Scott Brown
- Eliminated the judicial filibuster under O
- Eliminated the administration nomination filibuster under O

Republicans
- Eliminated the SCOTUS filibuster under Trump

"Said no Republican nominations with a Democrat Senate in an election year (Biden)"

That's as far as I got to see you're just kazzing again.

As you yourself showed when you posted Biden's quote, Biden never said that.

I didn't say it was a quote, government educated failure

Quoting, Paraphrasing, & Summarizing | UAGC Writing Center

writingcenter.ashford.edu

And you must've been home schooled as I didn't say that was a quote. I said the Biden quote you posted reveals he never said there would be "no Republican nominations with a Democrat Senate in an election year." Sadly, you're a pathological kazzer, so you're kazzing again.

OK, angry little tyke. Being a butt hole really appeals to you, huh?

You poor thing, you still kazzed. Biden never said, "no Republican nominations with a Democrat Senate in an election year."

 

[Faun]

Most Americans overwhelmingly vote Democratic

Most illegals vote Democrap.
Most perverts vote Democrap
Most dead people vote Democrap.

There fixed it for you.

I like the guy in the *** S&M outfit calling someone crazy, LOL

LOL

Your homo-erotic fantasies are noted and laughed at.

You're the one in the queer sex suit

I am? I'm wearing shorts and a t-shirt. That's your idea of a "queer sex suit??"

 

[jc456]

Everything in life has Consequences

Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster

Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans

Why not win the Senate and the White House and do it like Republicans did?

It can happen.

Then what about all those new precedents you lot set?

Like the judicial filibuster? No wait, that was you.
Ending the judicial filibuster? Oh, you again.

Why do you deliberately omit stuff?

Who ended the SCOTUS filibuster?

WHO blocked want was normally a pretty routine Presidential right to fill judicial vacancies in order to "save them" for their team (and no, I don't mean voting DOWN applicants).

WHO made up a new rule to prevent a president from filling a vacancy before an election?

and WHO reversed that rule 2 weeks before an election?

Those are MAJOR precedents and don't deny it. You know. If they weren't that made up rule would have held for 2020 instead of creating yet another precedent.

SO why shouldn't the Dems pack the court given YOUR behavior?

It's very simple. Win the Senate and the White House. Duh!

So you'll be fine with it if they win it and do that? There has already been a lot of whining from you guys about the possibility.

Bad ideas are still bad ideas.

You can't name anything they did out of order or against the constitutional process.

Yet, the Rs did something wrong.

You not liking it doesn't make it wrong.

Coyote also can't list a single time Democrats didn't confirm a Democrat scotus pick and waited for an election as she demands the Republicans do

Dems never refused to fill a seat in an election year (10 months away) and then filled a seat days before the election when it favored them

They never had the chance. If the roles were reversed there is no doubt Chucky would to exactly what Mitch is doing.............so grow the **** up and accept reality for once in your pathetic life.

OK

And if the roles were reversed, Mitch would not hesitate to pack the court

Agree?

Stacking the court isn't what you think it is. You think that you stack the court, you win, it's over.

You only win until Republicans are back in charge, then they stack it back. Then you do. Then they do ...

This isn't the permanent takeover of the court you idiots think it is. You really don't grasp that, do you? You think the court is yours now

this is what cracks me up the most - they think if they do something clever the right will go "darn it, foiled by their genius" when in fact, they threaten to do something stupid, they do it also. stop doing stupid shit and making stupid threats and this gets a whole lot better for all of us.

Well, they create these scenarios creating a reaction by necessity, and then protest the reaction and say...see the opposition is creating a divide in the country.
Uh, no. They created the division!