Another result of MAGA/Trumpism

jc456 and then at the same time became a traiter to Americans signing NAFTA that his buddy Bush drew up in his final days in office with both buchwacker and slick willie screwing all Americans having jobs shipped overseas. and smellybozo always trys to convince everybody at USMB NAFTA was Bushs doing seriously.:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
as always smellybozo,i OWN you that it was BOTH bush AND Clinton that signed NAFAT dumfuck fag. here is a crying towel in defeat.:itsok:

How did NAFTA originally affect American politics?​

NAFTA was a product of both the first Bush and the Clinton Administrations.

Ross Perot was a patriot,he was AGAINST NAFTA that was WHY the elite did not care whichever puppet Bush or Clinton got elected just as long as Perot did not. DNC paid shill sealybobo err smellybozo has been exposed for the traiter to America and and DNC shill he is. he cannot stand up against facts that BOTH parties are corrupt and one in the same and an independent patriot who does not run of the corrupt party of either like Perot,does not have a chance to get elected for not being part of the corrupt ONE PARTY SYSTEM,he has been chance of building a snowball in hell.



signing the GOP package was just to make it look like he was looking out for the people tr

ing to disguise his traiterous actions with the NAFTA signing him and his very good pal Bush were in favor of.

Trump's base. 1/4 Tuesday's debate made them reconsider their vote.

How about you?
 
The Adams quote is scrambled, Washington's mildly so.

Adams wrote that in a letter seven years before the Constitutional convention. Washington upon leaving office.

Our Founders did not anticipate there would be political parties, and yet they formed almost immediately during the 1787 Constitutional convention.

Washington is the only President who was not a member of a political party.

To me, it is a weird oversight our Founders did not anticipate or appreciate there would be parties.

I think a "loyal opposition" is the lifeblood of a democracy.
Loyal opposition my ass. You support the far Left agenda and will be voting foe Heels Up. Who th3 fuck are you kidding.
 
1726486126439.webp
 
You can tell just how scared shitless the Trumptards are after their Fuhrer's horrible debate performance.

They have turned the hate dial up to 11.
 
Joe and the Prog gang saved the special interests. You better hurry. 2030 and the end of the world is getting closer.
No, it saved the economy. Go read up. You are babbling about things you know nothing about.
 
And the unions are endorsing Kamala

teamsters-1-1.jpeg

Gutfeld: This hasn’t happened in three decades​

Sep 19, 2024




Teamsters Won’t Endorse Presidential Candidate—Ending Long Run Of Democratic Endorsements​


 
Did you see what I wrote in the previous post? America is great except in the last 40 years the middle class has stalled and the rich got richer than ever.

And it’s directly because of Republican policies. Try to take back those unwise tax breaks from the mega rich and which party cries? Wake up. You’re not rich enough to be a Republican. Sorry dems aren’t perfect. But I suspect you’d cry Commy! If they did any more.
Who is responsible for the repeal of Glass-Stegal?


". . . The other day, Bill Clinton was asked why politicians often pay lip service to the need to regulate finance and business, but nothing ever seems to happen. His response:

I'll tell you exactly why. I think that politicians—particularly now, in the aftermath of this crash—fear that anything they do will be held against them later if anything bad happens. Look at all the grief I got for signing the bill that ended Glass-Steagall. There's not a single, solitary example that it had anything to do with the financial crash. And in fact, a study done afterward said that the unified banks were actually slightly less likely to fail than either the commercial banks that overloaded on subprime mortgages, or the investment banks, like Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and others.

The former President and I lived through the Glass-Steagall debate. And his statement is flat wrong. The Graham-Leach-Bliley Act that President Clinton signed had everything to do with the crisis. . ."




Repeal of Glass-Steagall Caused the Financial Crisis​

The repeal of the law separating commercial and investment banking caused the 2008 financial crisis.
945330.jpg
 

teamsters-1-1.jpeg

Gutfeld: This hasn’t happened in three decades​

Sep 19, 2024




Teamsters Won’t Endorse Presidential Candidate—Ending Long Run Of Democratic Endorsements​




It's a brilliant move. It'll make Democrats support unions more.

But notice they didn't endorse Trump? So a LONG way to go before Trump wins over unions.

Unions won big last year and got Biden's support. Trump didn't support them. With Biden's support, the middle class (unions) are good for the next 20 years before automation takes over. We're having less kids so less people to worry about 20 years from now.

"Neither major candidate was able to make serious commitments to our union to ensure the interests of working people are always put before Big Business," Teamsters General President Sean O'Brien said in a statement.

He added, "We sought commitments from both [former president Donald] Trump and [Vice President Kamala] Harris not to interfere in critical union campaigns or core Teamsters industries—and to honor our members’ right to strike—but were unable to secure those pledges."

Kamala will honor their right to strike. What about Trump? Oh yea. He and Elon Musk broke the law recently threatening unions.

UAW hits Musk, Trump with federal labor charges over union-busting comments​

 
But notice they didn't endorse Trump?
Yeah, we all know the teamsters are corrupt and have been corrupt for decades and decades.

"The Deep State," is an intellectual notion that goes far beyond just government pal.
 
Yeah, we all know the teamsters are corrupt and have been corrupt for decades and decades.

"The Deep State," is an intellectual notion that goes far beyond just government pal.
I wonder what Trump promised them to have them do this. Kamala can solve this.

"We sought commitments from both not to interfere in critical union campaigns or core Teamsters industries and to honor our members’ right to strike but were unable to secure those pledges."

I believe Kamala will pledge this.
 
The whole point of moving jobs to China was to end unions in America. We still have work to do to get that done.
Thank god we are all having fewer kids or no kids at all. This and automations going to take jobs. But why do humans have to work? I mean ditch dig. AI robots can do that.

Unions, specifically auto unionsm, bought themselves 20 years. Good luck to your kids if they can’t afford college. All my nephews go to michigan state university. One’s going to law school now. It’s a changing world. When you look 20 years ahead what are your babies going to do? We might have automated AI robot plumbers.
 
Thank god we are all having fewer kids or no kids at all. This and automations going to take jobs. But why do humans have to work? I mean ditch dig. AI robots can do that.

Unions, specifically auto unionsm, bought themselves 20 years. Good luck to your kids if they can’t afford college. All my nephews go to michigan state university. One’s going to law school now. It’s a changing world. When you look 20 years ahead what are your babies going to do? We might have automated AI robot plumbers.
You have that reversed actually.

The jobs most likely to be outsourced to AI will be the jobs your nephews are going to college for.

1727014462550.webp


". . . Administrative jobs in particular are under the biggest threat from digitization and automation. These include career paths such as bank tellers and clerks, postal service clerks and ticket clerks—the three fields expected to decline the fastest in clerical or secretarial roles.

Other jobs expected to be affected are building caretakers and housekeepers, telemarketers, door-to-door sales workers, shop salespersons and client information and customer service workers. So, if you work in any type of data-entry role, AI may potentially change your job.. . . "


Here is the report from Goldman's.


1727014616002.webp



Most skilled trade jobs, like auto repair, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, etc., those will be the least affected.
 
We might have automated AI robot plumbers

You have it exactly backwards. AI is well ahead of robotics. An AI bot can easily out think a lawyer, but the dexterity needed for plumbing and other such jobs is much more difficult for technology to replace.

I say this as a pen pusher myself.
 
Trump wants to run the USA like a division of trump corp. and he will be guilty of tax evasion like his company already was found to be. His hotels hire illegals. He’s an illegal employer. And trump will profit personally all the way. He can’t be trusted.

We don’t need a revolution. The only problem is trump has too much money and you not enough

But he was POTUS and none of that happened
 
You have that reversed actually.

The jobs most likely to be outsourced to AI will be the jobs your nephews are going to college for.

View attachment 1016200

". . . Administrative jobs in particular are under the biggest threat from digitization and automation. These include career paths such as bank tellers and clerks, postal service clerks and ticket clerks—the three fields expected to decline the fastest in clerical or secretarial roles.

Other jobs expected to be affected are building caretakers and housekeepers, telemarketers, door-to-door sales workers, shop salespersons and client information and customer service workers. So, if you work in any type of data-entry role, AI may potentially change your job.. . . "


Here is the report from Goldman's.


View attachment 1016202


Most skilled trade jobs, like auto repair, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, etc., those will be the least affected.
AI lawyers?

Construction management?

They’ll do fine. Even if they don’t their parents and gandfather and me will all leave them money.

And by design my brother had his kids later in life because American capitalism is expensive. Put off having kids by ten years. So when my nephews retire at 65 my brother would be 95. My family is set
 
You have it exactly backwards. AI is well ahead of robotics. An AI bot can easily out think a lawyer, but the dexterity needed for plumbing and other such jobs is much more difficult for technology to replace.

I say this as a pen pusher myself.
I think you are on to something here

I never thought of it that way
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom