whatever are you talking about?
you are for the war on drugs but you are against a war on guns....yet the war on drugs has been a total failure for much the same reason a war on guns would be.
War on Drugs? Nixon 1971. He was a republican.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
whatever are you talking about?
you are for the war on drugs but you are against a war on guns....yet the war on drugs has been a total failure for much the same reason a war on guns would be.
No, but later amendments dueThe Bill of Rights doesn't guarantee the right to vote.
They can certainly apply for those rights back and they can show why they should have those rights back.And once they have done their sentence and paid their debt to society they should get those rights back. It is wrong to keep punishing people indefinitely.
Sure, 5th and 14th amendments " nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" = it clearly states the Govt can take those things, with proper due process, it does not say that the Govt has to give them backCan you point to where the constitution says a person can lose rights permanently after completing their punishment?
They can certainly apply for those rights back and they can show why they should have those rights back.
Nope. Neither one of them say you can permanently lose rights.Sure, 5th and 14th amendments " nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" = it clearly states the Govt can take those things, with proper due process, it does not say that the Govt has to give them back
Gets my voteWho’s for open borders and legalizing drug dealing while advocating we can own M1 Abrams?
Most felons don't come close to paying their debt to their victims, much less to society. We need "You broke it, you bought it" laws.And once they have done their sentence and paid their debt to society they should get those rights back. It is wrong to keep punishing people indefinitely.
i didn’t say it was indefiante…they are more then welcome to apply for their gun rights backYou and I will just have to disagree on the idea of indefinite punishments for citizens. I think they are wrong, you do not. I doubt either of us will change the others mind
Neither party wants to lock up people that might vote for them.War on Drugs? Nixon 1971. He was a republican.
they are still felonsNope. Neither one of them say you can permanently lose rights.
When a felon pays all their dues to society, what are they? a Citizen.
Shit man, this wasnt even a thing till the 60s. Then here comes Democrats and their gun grabbing asses. And you follow them right along wanting to persecute CITIZENS for crimes they MIGHT do.
Its called "thought crimes" and its tyrannical. And unconstitutional.
Neither party wants to lock up people that might vote for them.
It's all about the voters. You have to unpack the statement further.You do know that's crazy.
Georgia registered 300,000 new voters to stop Trump.It's all about the voters. You have to unpack the statement further.
Provisional data from CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics indicate that there were an estimated 100,306 drug overdose deaths in the United States during 12-month period ending in April 2021, an increase of 28.5% from the 78,056 deaths during the same period the year before.
Though mass shootings tend to get the most attention, they are not the cause of most firearm deaths in the U.S.
In 2020, 45,222 people died from gun-related injuries, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — about 124 people each day. Of those, 54% were suicides, and 43% were murders, according to a Pew Research Center analysis.
Lol, you obviously dont understand what the Constitution actually is.they are still felons
show me where the US Constution says they get them back after already taken?
I'm guessing there's some remorse there too.Georgia registered 300,000 new voters to stop Trump.
i didn’t say it was indefiante…they are more then welcome to apply for their gun rights back
i am saying nothing can be taken without due process of law. That’s what the Constitution says…yes even your first amendment rightsLol, you obviously dont understand what the Constitution actually is.
I guess, using your authoritarian interpretation of the Constitution, a jury/judge can take away someones first amendment rights. Or they could say from now on, they dont get jury trials. Or they could say i must quarter troops in time of peace.
True enlightenment, Mr. Authoritarian. Thanks.