Ravi
Diamond Member
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The militia is supposed to exist to protect the right of the people to keep and bear arms. That in no way reads that people keep and bear arms in order to satisfy the requirements of the militia only.
Wuh? That's the screwiest interpretation I've ever seen. And your second sentence isn't what I said.