Question about WW2..

Bullcrap. Under governments freely chosen by democratic elections Eastern Europe would have been saved from both the Nazis and the Soviets who were actually worse than the Nazis. After all, Stalin had nothing to do with the post-war governments of West Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, the UK, France. All of western Europe had far better living conditions and economies than the countries under Stalin's Soviet Union.
Yes just think about six million Jews Stalin killed, oh wait! you complete arsehole. :shutupsmiley:
 
Bullcrap. Under governments freely chosen by democratic elections Eastern Europe would have been saved from both the Nazis and the Soviets who were actually worse than the Nazis. After all, Stalin had nothing to do with the post-war governments of West Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, the UK, France. All of western Europe had far better living conditions and economies than the countries under Stalin's Soviet Union.
Are you under the belief democracies don’t go to war?
 
lol It was Russia who was saved, by Churchill and FDR. Russians are famous for their delusions and idiotic propaganda narratives. It's still the 1950's in Moscow.
Wrong! it's still the 1950s in Washington, the Soviet Union isn't Russia and the Soviet Union went over thirty years ago but you clowns can't live without it, also i didn't see any US Marines at the battle of Kursk or Stalingrad, you are full of shit.
 
Of course they do, but during and after WWII the democracies did far better than the countries dominated by the USSR and PRC.
Yes they did but you made a ridiculous statement in your prior post, that had nothing to do with this point.

You claimed if Eastern European nations were democracies prior to WWII, they wouldn’t have suffered under Nazism or Soviet Communism. What proof do you have to support this theory?

You must know some of these nations where democracies, albeit in name only and mostly nonfunctional and corrupt.
 
lol It was Russia who was saved, by Churchill and FDR. Russians are famous for their delusions and idiotic propaganda narratives. It's still the 1950's in Moscow.
You might want to educate yourself on WWII, before posting.
 
You might want to educate yourself on WWII, before posting.
There are loads of books on the war. I remember reading an article a while back that not all are accurate and they had created certain myths about the war. I need to hunt that article out again.


My next WWII book purchase is the Psychology of Nazism by Daniel Pick.

The biggest pile of crap on USMB is when Nazism is dragged up.
 
There are loads of books on the war. I remember reading an article a while back that not all are accurate and they had created certain myths about the war. I need to hunt that article out again.


My next WWII book purchase is the Psychology of Nazism by Daniel Pick.

The biggest pile of crap on USMB is when Nazism is dragged up.
There was no myth about what the Red Army did to the Nazis, they were responsible for about 85% of Nazi casualties, and as Churchill said the Red army tore the Guts out of the Nazi war machine, end of story, i have two of the books by Antony Beevor on my shelf, D-Day and Arnhem both quite good, i believe he did one on Stallingrad.
 
Last edited:
There was no myth about what the Red Army did to the Nazis, they were responsible for about 85% of Nazi casualties, and as Churchill said the Red army tore the Guts out of the Nazi war machine, end of story.
The ghost army was interesting, never fired a shot!
 
I knew about them but never read a book about what they did in real detail.
When I travel for work, I'll sometimes tune into Radio 4. An American was talking about the ghost army and what they did. Very interesting although there's not a great deal about them. Just reading the Wikipedia link gives sufficient detail about them.

I need to read up on the Red Army.
 

Forum List

Back
Top