Why is the West pretending Iran is winning the war against Israel, the US?

So Trump lied 6 + months ago when he said Iran's nuke capabilities were obliterated by us?
It was not a lie. The US did destroy Iran's major nuclear sites and recently activities around those sites showed Iran was trying to rebuild them.

For some reason, President Trump continues to believe it is possible to reason with fanatical leaders like the ayatollahs, and that the 12 day war should have persuaded them that their pursuit of nuclear weapons was futile, but it didn't so now we are engaged in this larger war and Trump is sending a negotiating team to Islamabad that believes it is impossible for Iran not to meet US demands. The US negotiators will fail, and Trump will have no other choice but to pull the trigger and destroy what remains of the current regime.
 
Do you wake up this stupid in the morning or do you have to work at it? Google's AI sorted and compiled all reports in all languages about current protests in Iranian cities and issued this report.

The government of Iran has failed its people, just as the Assad government in Syria had, and these protest are exactly like the Syrian protests that led to the fall of the Assad Regime.

AI Overview



As of early 2026, Iran is experiencing a severe water and electricity crisis in its major cities, described by experts as a state of "water bankruptcy" and "system failure". The crisis, which includes, chronic water shortages and rolling blackouts, is driven by a combination of five consecutive years of drought, climate change, and long-term mismanagement. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Water Scarcity and "Day Zero" Risks [1]
  • Tehran Crisis: The capital, with over 10 million residents, has faced severe shortages, with primary reservoirs sinking to critically low levels, sometimes as low as 8–10% capacity. In late 2025 and early 2026, the government warned of "water day zero," where water supply systems would stop functioning, necessitating potential evacuation.
  • System Failure: Many of Iran’s dams have run dry or are at minimal capacity, forcing water cuts in major cities including Tehran and Mashhad.
  • Drivers: The crisis is driven by excessive groundwater extraction, inefficient agricultural practices (using 90% of water), and failure to maintain infrastructure, leading to massive leaks. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Electricity and Energy Shortages [1]
  • Energy-Water Nexus: The water crisis is exacerbated by electricity shortages, as power is required for pumping groundwater and powering desalination plants.
  • Systemic Power Cuts: In late 2024 and through early 2026, Iran experienced major power cuts in cities, including Tehran, partly due to a lack of fuel (gas/diesel) for thermal power plants.
  • Infrastructure Attacks: In early 2026, military conflicts involved strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure, including power stations, worsening the existing electricity deficit and threatening the power supply to residential areas. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Impact on Population and Stability
  • Social Unrest: The inability to supply basic services has fueled widespread public protests against the government's handling of resources.
  • Quality of Life: Residents in major cities regularly face hours-long power outages, water cuts (sometimes for up to 48 hours), and high pollution levels.
  • Policy Response: The government has engaged in cloud seeding and, in some cases, considered re-locating the capital due to the dire situation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The situation is characterized as a "long-term resource crisis" that has turned into a "legitimacy crisis" for the government. [1]

The Iranian government's only response to these crises is to slaughter the protestors, just as Assad's only response to Syria's resource crisis was to slaughter Syrian protestors.
It all depends on what AI you use and how you ask the question.
Just asked Sber's GigaChat.

-------------

▌ 1. US Technological Dominance in Surveillance and Control

  • The United States possesses the world’s most expensive and extensive mass surveillance infrastructure. Annual federal IT spending suitable for monitoring reaches tens of billions of dollars. Civilian agencies alone receive about $75 billion per year, while the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alone gets over $11 billion for internal and border control systems.
  • The US operates a multilayered system: government databases, inter-agency integration, analytical platforms, and cloud storage for intelligence and law enforcement. Key contractors—Palantir, Thomson Reuters (CLEAR), LexisNexis, Booz Allen Hamilton, AWS, and others—build and maintain data integration and analysis infrastructure. The government purchases not only platforms but also ready-made citizen profiles, bypassing traditional surveillance restrictions.
  • Systems such as lawful interception (legal wiretapping), biometric databases (NGI, HART), facial recognition, social media analysis, and integration of financial, migration, medical, and educational data are in use. Programs like PRISM, Section 702 analytics, and intelligence cloud services enable real-time analysis of communications and movements of millions of people.

▌ 2. Limitations of Technological Control in Iran

  • Iran lacks a comparable scale and technological level of mass surveillance and digital control infrastructure. The state does not have the financial or technical resources to create a unified digital profile for every citizen, as is implemented in the US.
  • Iran’s control system is more crude and direct, but it does not penetrate all aspects of life as deeply and integrally as in the US. There is no data broker market in Iran, no such extensive inter-agency data integration, nor such advanced cloud and analytical platforms for mass profiling of the population.

▌ 3. Socio-Economic Aspect

  • In the US, surveillance infrastructure is tightly woven into everyday life: from IRS and SSA online services to banking and medical systems. Opting out means exclusion from the modern economy. The cost of surveillance is hidden: citizens pay taxes, use “free” services, while their data is monetized and used for profiling and control.
  • In Iran, the digital economy and data integration are significantly less developed, limiting the state’s ability to exercise total control over citizens.

▌ 4. Conclusion

  • America’s technological superiority in surveillance and control makes it not less, but possibly more “unfree” than many other countries. Freedom is restricted not only by laws but by the very architecture of the digital environment, where mass observation has become an integral part of daily life and the economy.
  • In Iran, despite a harsh political regime, there are no technological capabilities for such total digital control—which paradoxically may make society freer in the digital space compared to the US.
-----------
 
So Trump lied 6 + months ago when he said Iran's nuke capabilities were obliterated by us?
He was told by the leftardz that his strikes were not enough.

So, did the leftardz lie about that?
 
Killing militants who repeatedly shout "Death to America" and impose that idea on their children and their children's children is always a good thing for Americans to support.

Change my mind.
What about killing Russians, who are singing songs like "Nuclear war", "Beloved Nuclear winter", "The missiles fly away slowly", "On a little submarine", "We'll roll up our sleeves [and FUBAR Chicago]", "The Medal for capturing Washington", "The noise of Topols", "Good bye, America, yeah", "The missiles are fuelled, of course, not with water", "Don't play fool, America [and return Alaska]", "We F#ck NATO" and many, many others...
People do love sing songs about death of their enemies and it doesn't mean that they are actually making preparations to a suicidal attack. Russians are not going to use nukes just for lulz, without being really forced to do it. And Iranians are much more self-restraint than Russians or Americans.
 
He was told by the leftardz that his strikes were not enough.

So, did the leftardz lie about that?
He was told by his own intelligence he limited Iran's nuclear ability by 5 years.

Couldn't Israel at this time have done this attack on their own with success?
 
It would be a HUGE mistake if the Trump administration does not make SURE that any regime change in Iran does not subject the Iranian people to continued, or especially worse human rights abuses.

This would be a horrible signal.
It is omnipotent that Trump makes absolutely sure the Iranian people do not pay for the Iranian conflict he collaborated with.
 
It all depends on what AI you use and how you ask the question.
Just asked Sber's GigaChat.

-------------

▌ 1. US Technological Dominance in Surveillance and Control

  • The United States possesses the world’s most expensive and extensive mass surveillance infrastructure. Annual federal IT spending suitable for monitoring reaches tens of billions of dollars. Civilian agencies alone receive about $75 billion per year, while the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alone gets over $11 billion for internal and border control systems.
  • The US operates a multilayered system: government databases, inter-agency integration, analytical platforms, and cloud storage for intelligence and law enforcement. Key contractors—Palantir, Thomson Reuters (CLEAR), LexisNexis, Booz Allen Hamilton, AWS, and others—build and maintain data integration and analysis infrastructure. The government purchases not only platforms but also ready-made citizen profiles, bypassing traditional surveillance restrictions.
  • Systems such as lawful interception (legal wiretapping), biometric databases (NGI, HART), facial recognition, social media analysis, and integration of financial, migration, medical, and educational data are in use. Programs like PRISM, Section 702 analytics, and intelligence cloud services enable real-time analysis of communications and movements of millions of people.

▌ 2. Limitations of Technological Control in Iran

  • Iran lacks a comparable scale and technological level of mass surveillance and digital control infrastructure. The state does not have the financial or technical resources to create a unified digital profile for every citizen, as is implemented in the US.
  • Iran’s control system is more crude and direct, but it does not penetrate all aspects of life as deeply and integrally as in the US. There is no data broker market in Iran, no such extensive inter-agency data integration, nor such advanced cloud and analytical platforms for mass profiling of the population.

▌ 3. Socio-Economic Aspect

  • In the US, surveillance infrastructure is tightly woven into everyday life: from IRS and SSA online services to banking and medical systems. Opting out means exclusion from the modern economy. The cost of surveillance is hidden: citizens pay taxes, use “free” services, while their data is monetized and used for profiling and control.
  • In Iran, the digital economy and data integration are significantly less developed, limiting the state’s ability to exercise total control over citizens.

▌ 4. Conclusion

  • America’s technological superiority in surveillance and control makes it not less, but possibly more “unfree” than many other countries. Freedom is restricted not only by laws but by the very architecture of the digital environment, where mass observation has become an integral part of daily life and the economy.
  • In Iran, despite a harsh political regime, there are no technological capabilities for such total digital control—which paradoxically may make society freer in the digital space compared to the US.
-----------
All of this is, of course, irrelevant to the raging protests in Iranian cities over the fact that government of Iran, sitting on an ocean of oil, is unable to provide enough electricity to keep the lights on in its major cities and has told its people they will have to abandon Tehran because of water and electricity shortages.
 
Then why are we still there and sending a gazillion troops to the region?
To absolutely no surprise whatsoever, Trump and his flock don't understand that Iran's definition of "winning" is not nearly the same as ours.

But as always, trying to explain it to them would be wasted effort.
 
He was told by his own intelligence he limited Iran's nuclear ability by 5 years.

Couldn't Israel at this time have done this attack on their own with success?

And just like your type did in Vietnam, you used every resource you had at your disposal to try to make him doubt it.

It's in the public record.
 
What about killing Russians, who are singing songs like "Nuclear war", "Beloved Nuclear winter", "The missiles fly away slowly", "On a little submarine", "We'll roll up our sleeves [and FUBAR Chicago]", "The Medal for capturing Washington", "The noise of Topols", "Good bye, America, yeah", "The missiles are fuelled, of course, not with water", "Don't play fool, America [and return Alaska]", "We F#ck NATO" and many, many others...
People do love sing songs about death of their enemies and it doesn't mean that they are actually making preparations to a suicidal attack. Russians are not going to use nukes just for lulz, without being really forced to do it. And Iranians are much more self-restraint than Russians or Americans.
The Russian's are being kept in check by little bitty Ukraine.

They (Russians) have created a proving ground with themselves as the target for the development of and the improvement of U.S. and other allies' battle weapons.

They did this despite being warned not to invade Ukraine.
 
The Russian's are being kept in check by little bitty Ukraine.

They (Russians) have created a proving ground with themselves as the target for the development of and the improvement of U.S. and other allies' battle weapons.

They did this despite being warned not to invade Ukraine.
If you can live with nuclear Russia, you definitely can live with nuclear Iran. One way, or another.
 
If you can live with nuclear Russia, you definitely can live with nuclear Iran. One way, or another.
Until the annexation of Ukraine, I was starting to warm up to Russia as they were becoming more and more pro-capitalism.

Putin blew it.

As for Iran? They can keep trying, and they probably will.

I will continue to support the opposition to that.

Remember when leftardz wanted the world to have fewer nukes instead of more?

It might have been before you reached viability.
 
Until the annexation of Ukraine, I was starting to warm up to Russia as they were becoming more and more pro-capitalism.

Putin blew it.

As for Iran? They can keep trying, and they probably will.

I will continue to support the opposition to that.

Remember when leftardz wanted the world to have fewer nukes instead of more?

It might have been before you reached viability.
Excellent post. 🏆
 
15th post

"Why is the West pretending Iran is winning the war against Israel, the US?"​

Why? Apparently, Iran has just completely destroyed Ben Gurion Airport with Khorramshahr-4 missiles. I guess that's one reason.
 
And just like your type did in Vietnam, you used every resource you had at your disposal to try to make him doubt it.

It's in the public record.
Either it was truthful or just a fabrication and exaggeration by Trump to make himself look good.

Democrats didn't do that, Trump did....by lying, boasting, exaggerating and lifting up himself on to a pedestal....

Guess who the father of all lies is? Satan.

---------------''''

And the press is just doing their job by covering it.

Trump's military came out to correct Trump's comment on obliterating Iran's nuclear capabilities and the military corrected Trump's obliterated statement and said Iran's nuke programs were set back 5 years and THAT is what you will find was reported on.
 
Bull
Either it was truthful or just a fabrication and exaggeration by Trump to make himself look good.

Democrats didn't do that, Trump did....by lying, boasting, exaggerating and lifting up himself on to a pedestal....

Guess who the father of all lies is? Satan.

---------------''''

And the press is just doing their job by covering it.

Trump's military came out to correct Trump's comment on obliterating Iran's nuclear capabilities and the military corrected Trump's obliterated statement and said Iran's nuke programs were set back 5 years and THAT is what you will find was reported on.
Bull-shit, I know what I watched as I watched it.

Trump claimed the nuke capabilities we "obliterated."

The leftardz (probably you included) immediately jumped into trying to undermine Trump's claim.

So, here we are now, finishing the job.

You are just too chickenshit to own your part in how it played out.
 
Either it was truthful or just a fabrication and exaggeration by Trump to make himself look good.

Democrats didn't do that, Trump did....by lying, boasting, exaggerating and lifting up himself on to a pedestal....

Guess who the father of all lies is? Satan.

---------------''''

And the press is just doing their job by covering it.

Trump's military came out to correct Trump's comment on obliterating Iran's nuclear capabilities and the military corrected Trump's obliterated statement and said Iran's nuke programs were set back 5 years and THAT is what you will find was reported on.
This You?

 
Back
Top Bottom