Question about WW2..

[Picaro]

You've got some issues here.

Red Ice is a white supremacy propaganda and conspiracy theory site, which mediabiasfactcheck rates as a Questionable Source and Low Factual Reporting. Their assessment is representative of popular opinion. The article you linked goes on to talk about the Illuminati as if it were accepted face.

Grau and his peer group think three Jews living in a castle in Switzerland are micro-managing the world's bowel movements via satellite.

 

[Stryder50]

Next question


Why did Hitler stop the successful invasion of France just before Dunkerk …. For so long as it took to let the English escape?

1> The armor divisions had run too far ahead of the foot walking infantry divisions supporting them and consolidating the gains.
2> Supply and fuel status was low and the support logisitcs had to catch up.
3> Concern that the armor was over extended geographically and the Allies might still counter attack.
4> Divine Providence.

 

[Grau]

No, Germany has not yet invaded the Soviet Union. But Hitler's geopolitical assessments were spot on, including that Churchill's refusal to negotiate a peace settlement would benefit America while ending the British Empire (which he did not want). Another interesting fact is that he originally wanted to resettle Europe's Jews in Madagascar, which was a French colony in Africa. That was one reason he left the French fleet independent to protect French colonial possessions.

P.S. I am not a Holocaust denier.

Thanks for the update.
I wrote earlier about Churchill 's deceptions to get the US into the war as well as Stalin's invasion plans for all of the West .

You can safely ignore the "Hollywood educated" sheeple who been brainwashed by decades of MSM rubbish about Irving and his alleged "Holocaust denial" , "anti Semitism" etc.

I don't deny that the Holocaust happened either but it's revealing that we need to clarify that in anticipation of the predictable slander that inconvenient facts incur.

Enjoy those inconvenient facts,

 

[irosie91]

Thanks for the update.
I wrote earlier about Churchill 's deceptions to get the US into the war as well as Stalin's invasion plans for all of the West .

You can safely ignore the "Hollywood educated" sheeple who been brainwashed by decades of MSM rubbish about Irving and his alleged "Holocaust denial" , "anti Semitism" etc.

I don't deny that the Holocaust happened either but it's revealing that we need to clarify that in anticipation of the predictable slander that inconvenient facts incur.

Enjoy those inconvenient facts,

what inconvenient "facts" ?

 

[irosie91]

Thanks for the update.
I wrote earlier about Churchill 's deceptions to get the US into the war as well as Stalin's invasion plans for all of the West .

You can safely ignore the "Hollywood educated" sheeple who been brainwashed by decades of MSM rubbish about Irving and his alleged "Holocaust denial" , "anti Semitism" etc.

I don't deny that the Holocaust happened either but it's revealing that we need to clarify that in anticipation of the predictable slander that inconvenient facts incur.

Enjoy those inconvenient facts,

still waiting for the inconvenient "facts"

 

[AZrailwhale]

1> The armor divisions had run too far ahead of the foot walking infantry divisions supporting them and consolidating the gains.
2> Supply and fuel status was low and the support logisitcs had to catch up.
3> Concern that the armor was over extended geographically and the Allies might still counter attack.
4> Divine Providence.

Plus Goering convinced Hitler he could destroy the RN and strand the BEF on the beach to be captured.

 

[Grau]

still waiting for the inconvenient "facts"

All you need to do is to read the "inconvenient facts" in my Post # 108 and attempt to refute something I've written.

I won't even call you any names.

How about that?

 

[irosie91]

All you need to do is to read the "inconvenient facts" in my Post # 108 and attempt to refute something I've written.

I won't even call you any names.

How about that?

nothing particularly "inconvenient" about your POST # 108----it, correctly, discusses the significant support that your beloved Saint, Nabi Adolf had and has in both Britain and the USA

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Berlin at the end of WW2.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Next question


Why did Hitler stop the successful invasion of France just before Dunkerk …. For so long as it took to let the English escape?

He thought the Brits would join him in fighting Stalin

 

[ShahdagMountains]

He thought the Brits would join him in fighting Stalin

The British knew for years that Germany was rearming in preparation for hostilities, yet kept it under wraps in secret files. Sleepwalking into WW 2; Stanley Baldwin and appeasement. They all thought Churchill was mad, till it was nearly too late.

There’s a TV movie about it: The Gathering Storm.

 

[Mushroom]

Some of us have known that for a long time yet the usual suspects continue with the bullshit that the Soviet Union collaborated with the Nazis.

Right, because the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact is all a lie, right?

 

[Mushroom]

Supply and fuel status was low and the support logisitcs had to catch up.

As impressive as the German Military was in WWII, technologically when it comes to logistics it was little changed from what Napoleon used over a century earlier.

Yes, they had tanks and armored personnel carriers. But most of their infantry was on foot. And most of their artillery, fuel, food, and supplies actually moved from location to location by horses.

That caused them problems in France, as well as later in the Soviet Union. Horses are slow and actually high maintenance when trying to move huge amounts of material to and through a war zone. And they move much slower than tanks or even foot infantry. That is why they were shocked when they realized the US Army did not use horses at all. They had so many trucks of good quality that they moved all of their material via trucks, at speeds and distances that they could not even begin to imagine.

Especially when it comes to fuel, as you can only haul it for a certain distance before you get diminishing returns. Because if you are moving it in a truck, that truck itself is using fuel. That is not a problem with horse drawn fuel tankers, but they are slow and can carry less fuel. Their only advantage is they do not consume it. The Allies completely avoided that as in their plans they decided to rely on pipelines. And once an area was secure, they quickly started to lay pipelines so they would not even need trucks to move the fuel towards the front.

And for the final distance from the pipeline head to the front, not using tanker trucks as much as simply using five gallon "jerry cans". Not quite as efficient, but with the benefit that they could move fuel with any truck, not just ones designed for fuel. Had to rush forward 3/2 of a load of food and ammo? No problem, top off the load with jerry cans of fuel and off you go.

 

[Deadstick]

Right, because the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact is all a lie, right?

No it happened and i have explained many times why, but in case you missed it i will repeat it, Britain and other western Countries after being asked by the Soviets to have a pact against Germany in case of aggression by Germany refused, so the Soviets were left with little option but to play for time as far as Germany was concerned, otherwise over two million Nazi troops would have occupied all of Poland and been right on the border of the Soviet union long before Barbarossa, those Western Countries were probably hoping the Nazis would attack the Soviet Union rather than Europe, are you clear now?

 

[Deadstick]

The British knew for years that Germany was rearming in preparation for hostilities, yet kept it under wraps in secret files. Sleepwalking into WW 2; Stanley Baldwin and appeasement. They all thought Churchill was mad, till it was nearly too late.

There’s a TV movie about it: The Gathering Storm.

There were people among the elite in Britain who would have been more than happy to do a deal with Hitler before the war, we could very easily have ended up on the wrong side if that scum had prevailed.

 

[Deadstick]

The British knew for years that Germany was rearming in preparation for hostilities, yet kept it under wraps in secret files. Sleepwalking into WW 2; Stanley Baldwin and appeasement. They all thought Churchill was mad, till it was nearly too late.

There’s a TV movie about it: The Gathering Storm.

Indeed because they had shares in the German arms Companies, the Germans were not even supposed to have an air force yet we stood by while they built one.

 

[irosie91]

There were people among the elite in Britain who would have been more than happy to do a deal with Hitler before the war, we could very easily have ended up on the wrong side if that scum had prevailed.

who is "we" ----are you british? ---if so and you consider islamo nazism
to be "wrong" then your statement is MORE THAN CORRECT----there are now, even more islamo nazis in limey land

 

[Mushroom]

No it happened and i have explained many times why, but in case you missed it i will repeat it, Britain and other western Countries after being asked by the Soviets to have a pact against Germany in case of aggression by Germany refused, so the Soviets were left with little option but to play for time as far as Germany was concerned, otherwise over two million Nazi troops would have occupied all of Poland and been right on the border of the Soviet union long before Barbarossa, those Western Countries were probably hoping the Nazis would attack the Soviet Union rather than Europe, are you clear now?

Right, sure. They did not agree to carve up and petition Poland and Eastern Europe between the two of them agreed upon in a secret military pact.

The same way they never allowed secret German Army bases in the Soviet Union, or cooperation's between Junkers and Tupolev with secret factories outside of Moscow. Or the secret German Artillery School near Rostov-on-Don. Or the secret Kama Tank School at Kazan.

Nope, no secret agreements there, Nothing to see.

 

[Deadstick]

Right, sure. They did not agree to carve up and petition Poland and Eastern Europe between the two of them agreed upon in a secret military pact.

The same way they never allowed secret German Army bases in the Soviet Union, or cooperation's between Junkers and Tupolev with secret factories outside of Moscow. Or the secret German Artillery School near Rostov-on-Don. Or the secret Kama Tank School at Kazan.

Nope, no secret agreements there, Nothing to see.

Cool story.

 

[Mushroom]

Cool story.

Are you denying that the Molotov-Von Ribbentrop Pact was real?

Are you denying that the Kama Tank School was real?

Are you denying that the German Artillery School at Rostov=on=Don is real?

Come on now, use your big boy words. Are all of those I mentioned real, or not?

Want to know what I find particularly fascinating? The Soviet Union actually had a pretty good propaganda system. They knew to never lie, just shade things a bit. But it's particularly funny that modern Russia is so incredibly bad at it. They and their trolls actually do outright lie, and never seem to be able to provide facts to back up their claims.