We are calling for a massive breakup of the nation
Your reply was once again an ad hominem smokescreen technique that did nothing for your case. How do you know the lawyers strategy isn't to use this judge's standard as precedence or evidence to use for a supreme court ruling. You are not seeing it in the bigger picture as a whole thus missing the future entrapment checkmate move. ;-)When you smokescreen to avoid answering especially when taking selective portions leaving out the whole issue= is an ad hominem response as was your insult.You lost your argument and validated mine, you used an ad hominem reply that used only 1 instance out of the many.You can't even read your own post wording where the word "Rampant" is used then you conveniently lose sight of the word when saying no evidence of fraud (instead of saying no rampant evidence). THERE IS EVIDENCE, WHAT DO YOU THINK AFFIDAVITS TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES AND LITERAL VIDEO EVIDENCE IS.
Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.www.newsmax.com
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.
"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.
"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."
Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.
Also today....from the judge that dismissed the Trump campaign's attempted injunction of the certification of the Pennsylvania election....
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."
READ: Judge's order dismissing Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit | CNN Politics
Judge Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania dealt a death blow on Saturday to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's victory. Read Brann's order below.www.cnn.com
The grand promises made by Powell on what evidence they have.......and the pathetic presentations void of that evidence in court, have nothing to do with other.
Tossed out of court for being essentially worthless.
For example, Jesse Jacobs....the person cited in the disasterous pudding drip news conference. Her affidavit had already submitted and rejected by the courts for being too general and lacking specifics enough to be admissible...a week before Gulliani cited her.
“Ms. Jacob’s information is generalized. It asserts behavior with no date, location or frequency or names of employees,” he wrote. “In addition, [she] offers no indication of whether she took steps to address the alleged misconduct or to [alert] any supervisor about the alleged voter fraud. Ms. Jacob only came forward after the unofficial results of the voting indicated former Vice President Biden was the winner in the state of Michigan.”
Michigan Judge Rejects Challenge to Detroit Election Results
Finding that two voters’ claims about election fraud lack credibility, a Michigan judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit demanding an audit of results in the Detroit area.www.courthousenews.com
But good luck with that 'checkmate move'.
Or.....the affidavits don't back the accusations. If you're claiming, for example, that Dominion Software hacked the election.......but your affidavits are that one of the pollworkers was wearing a black lives T shirt (an actual example), the affidavit doesn't match the claim.
You don't seem to get the level of incompetence involved in Trump's legal efforts.
I don't think 'ad hominem' means what you think it means. My evisceration of your argument was based on evidence. Or more specifically, the lack of it to support Trump's claims.
Jesse Jacobs' affidavit was already long rejected as being uselessly general with no specific evidence of any wrong doing a week before Gulliani cited her in his disasterous news conference.
And Judge Matthew Brann tossed Trump's lawsuit in Pennsylvania because it lacked evidence.
Failure after failure demonstrates neither skill nor success. Trump's legal team is quite awful at this.
I still don't think ad hominem means what you think it means. I'm not arguing that Trump is wrong because his counsel is terrible. I'm arguing that his counsel is incompetent because of the poor job they've done in court and their record of failure.
With examples. Gulliani citing the affidavit from a woman when that affidavit was *already* rejected for providing no specific evidence of wrong doing is incompetent.
Trump's lawyers submitting no evidence to support their allegations in the Pennsylvania injunction was incompetent. As their injunction failed miserably, the lawsuit being dismissed with prejudice. And this by a Republican judge.
Its the lack of evidence that renders Trump's legal effort a failure. And incompetence in his counsel to argue claims that they can't back up with evidence.
This was a legal finding by a Federal Judge. You can ignore it as 'subjective opinion'. But it doesn't change the fact that Trump's law suit was dismissed with prejudice.
Meaning he can't refile it with amendments. And the certification that he sought to prevent with the failed injunction attempt....is less than 24 hours away.
Your reply was once again an ad hominem smokescreen technique that did nothing for your case. How do you know the lawyers strategy isn't to use this judge's standard as precedence or evidence to use for a supreme court ruling. You are not seeing it in the bigger picture as a whole thus missing the future entrapment checkmate move. ;-)When you smokescreen to avoid answering especially when taking selective portions leaving out the whole issue= is an ad hominem response as was your insult.You lost your argument and validated mine, you used an ad hominem reply that used only 1 instance out of the many.You can't even read your own post wording where the word "Rampant" is used then you conveniently lose sight of the word when saying no evidence of fraud (instead of saying no rampant evidence). THERE IS EVIDENCE, WHAT DO YOU THINK AFFIDAVITS TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES AND LITERAL VIDEO EVIDENCE IS.Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.
"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.
"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."
Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.
Also today....from the judge that dismissed the Trump campaign's attempted injunction of the certification of the Pennsylvania election....
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."
READ: Judge's order dismissing Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit | CNN Politics
Judge Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania dealt a death blow on Saturday to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's victory. Read Brann's order below.
The grand promises made by Powell on what evidence they have.......and the pathetic presentations void of that evidence in court, have nothing to do with other.
Tossed out of court for being essentially worthless.
For example, Jesse Jacobs....the person cited in the disasterous pudding drip news conference. Her affidavit had already submitted and rejected by the courts for being too general and lacking specifics enough to be admissible...a week before Gulliani cited her.
“Ms. Jacob’s information is generalized. It asserts behavior with no date, location or frequency or names of employees,” he wrote. “In addition, [she] offers no indication of whether she took steps to address the alleged misconduct or to [alert] any supervisor about the alleged voter fraud. Ms. Jacob only came forward after the unofficial results of the voting indicated former Vice President Biden was the winner in the state of Michigan.”
Michigan Judge Rejects Challenge to Detroit Election Results
Finding that two voters’ claims about election fraud lack credibility, a Michigan judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit demanding an audit of results in the Detroit area.
But good luck with that 'checkmate move'.
Or.....the affidavits don't back the accusations. If you're claiming, for example, that Dominion Software hacked the election.......but your affidavits are that one of the pollworkers was wearing a black lives T shirt (an actual example), the affidavit doesn't match the claim.
You don't seem to get the level of incompetence involved in Trump's legal efforts.
I don't think 'ad hominem' means what you think it means. My evisceration of your argument was based on evidence. Or more specifically, the lack of it to support Trump's claims.
Jesse Jacobs' affidavit was already long rejected as being uselessly general with no specific evidence of any wrong doing a week before Gulliani cited her in his disasterous news conference.
And Judge Matthew Brann tossed Trump's lawsuit in Pennsylvania because it lacked evidence.
Failure after failure demonstrates neither skill nor success. Trump's legal team is quite awful at this.
I still don't think ad hominem means what you think it means. I'm not arguing that Trump is wrong because his counsel is terrible. I'm arguing that his counsel is incompetent because of the poor job they've done in court and their record of failure.
With examples. Gulliani citing the affidavit from a woman when that affidavit was *already* rejected for providing no specific evidence of wrong doing is incompetent.
Trump's lawyers submitting no evidence to support their allegations in the Pennsylvania injunction was incompetent. As their injunction failed miserably, the lawsuit being dismissed with prejudice. And this by a Republican judge.
Its the lack of evidence that renders Trump's legal effort a failure. And incompetence in his counsel to argue claims that they can't back up with evidence.
This was a legal finding by a Federal Judge. You can ignore it as 'subjective opinion'. But it doesn't change the fact that Trump's law suit was dismissed with prejudice.
Meaning he can't refile it with amendments. And the certification that he sought to prevent with the failed injunction attempt....is less than 24 hours away.
That's a fair statement.
Trump is the one trying to steal it.
No. Trump is insisting on the elctoral process which the Democrats are denying by going directly to the mass media with exit polls substituting for offical counts.
My great-grandmother might have spoken German, but the language would be scarcely recognizable in this day and age.
You proved my point;Your reply was once again an ad hominem smokescreen technique that did nothing for your case. How do you know the lawyers strategy isn't to use this judge's standard as precedence or evidence to use for a supreme court ruling. You are not seeing it in the bigger picture as a whole thus missing the future entrapment checkmate move. ;-)When you smokescreen to avoid answering especially when taking selective portions leaving out the whole issue= is an ad hominem response as was your insult.You lost your argument and validated mine, you used an ad hominem reply that used only 1 instance out of the many.You can't even read your own post wording where the word "Rampant" is used then you conveniently lose sight of the word when saying no evidence of fraud (instead of saying no rampant evidence). THERE IS EVIDENCE, WHAT DO YOU THINK AFFIDAVITS TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES AND LITERAL VIDEO EVIDENCE IS.Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.
"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.
"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."
Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.
Also today....from the judge that dismissed the Trump campaign's attempted injunction of the certification of the Pennsylvania election....
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."
READ: Judge's order dismissing Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit | CNN Politics
Judge Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania dealt a death blow on Saturday to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's victory. Read Brann's order below.
The grand promises made by Powell on what evidence they have.......and the pathetic presentations void of that evidence in court, have nothing to do with other.
Tossed out of court for being essentially worthless.
For example, Jesse Jacobs....the person cited in the disasterous pudding drip news conference. Her affidavit had already submitted and rejected by the courts for being too general and lacking specifics enough to be admissible...a week before Gulliani cited her.
“Ms. Jacob’s information is generalized. It asserts behavior with no date, location or frequency or names of employees,” he wrote. “In addition, [she] offers no indication of whether she took steps to address the alleged misconduct or to [alert] any supervisor about the alleged voter fraud. Ms. Jacob only came forward after the unofficial results of the voting indicated former Vice President Biden was the winner in the state of Michigan.”
Michigan Judge Rejects Challenge to Detroit Election Results
Finding that two voters’ claims about election fraud lack credibility, a Michigan judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit demanding an audit of results in the Detroit area.
But good luck with that 'checkmate move'.
Or.....the affidavits don't back the accusations. If you're claiming, for example, that Dominion Software hacked the election.......but your affidavits are that one of the pollworkers was wearing a black lives T shirt (an actual example), the affidavit doesn't match the claim.
You don't seem to get the level of incompetence involved in Trump's legal efforts.
I don't think 'ad hominem' means what you think it means. My evisceration of your argument was based on evidence. Or more specifically, the lack of it to support Trump's claims.
Jesse Jacobs' affidavit was already long rejected as being uselessly general with no specific evidence of any wrong doing a week before Gulliani cited her in his disasterous news conference.
And Judge Matthew Brann tossed Trump's lawsuit in Pennsylvania because it lacked evidence.
Failure after failure demonstrates neither skill nor success. Trump's legal team is quite awful at this.
I still don't think ad hominem means what you think it means. I'm not arguing that Trump is wrong because his counsel is terrible. I'm arguing that his counsel is incompetent because of the poor job they've done in court and their record of failure.
With examples. Gulliani citing the affidavit from a woman when that affidavit was *already* rejected for providing no specific evidence of wrong doing is incompetent.
Trump's lawyers submitting no evidence to support their allegations in the Pennsylvania injunction was incompetent. As their injunction failed miserably, the lawsuit being dismissed with prejudice. And this by a Republican judge.
Its the lack of evidence that renders Trump's legal effort a failure. And incompetence in his counsel to argue claims that they can't back up with evidence.
This was a legal finding by a Federal Judge. You can ignore it as 'subjective opinion'. But it doesn't change the fact that Trump's law suit was dismissed with prejudice.
Meaning he can't refile it with amendments. And the certification that he sought to prevent with the failed injunction attempt....is less than 24 hours away.
Nope. My reply was once again a systematic citation of the failures of Trump's legal team....with concise explanations why their arguments failed.
They lack evidence.
But don't take my word for it. Life long republican Federal Judge Matthew Brann makes the same argument when he dismissed Trump's lawsuit with prejudice:
Ignore as you will. Certification of Pennsylvania's vote is tomorrow.
The MSM will likely not cover it or, if they do, they will do their best to denigrate Powell and trot out a line of so-called 'experts' to create a faux-objective, 'dog-and-pony show' analysis that will inevitably declare Biden the 'winner.' They have no interest in the truth or facts.Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.
"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.
"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."
Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.
Mine spoke Yiddish
So
