Powell says 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming

[Quasar44]

Skylar is clearly an interesting guy
He is a committed leftist but a patriot ??
Unusual??
Do you support Antifa and Blm ???

 

[Quasar44]

My hate of the left is far higher than Isis times the Nazis

Your hate of the US is obvious. Otherwise, why would you have made this statement: "It exposes how corrupt and what a banana republic the USA is?"

The hatred for the USA among conservatives is epidemic.

Yes , I utterly hate what the nation has become with the big tech censorships , fake Soviet news, corruption not seen since the Roman Empire!!

We must break it up

Nope. We won't be doing that.

Great nation collapse after a certain period of time and USA is a fake nation!!
We break up or we have a second CW and I die and you

No, we're not doing that.

Two problems with your analysis; 1) You're too blinded by your hatred of the USA to be rational 2) There's no need for our nation to split up.

You can’t have a nation where both sides have utter hate and contempt for the other side

And who says 'both sides have utter hate and contempt for each other'?

You may be projecting your own hate and contempt. Especially given how much you loathe the good ol' US of A.

The news is 24/7 hate of conservatives, Christianity and white males
My side is no different

Or....you're so mired in hate for the USA, that you see nothing but hatred. And of course, your own victimhood.

Patriots (conservatives) love the United States and our Constitution. Marxist like you hate the United States, our Constitution, our way of life, and democracy.

Aren't you the guy calling for mass executions of American citizens and civil war?

That doesn't sound like love the USA at all. But a seething hatred of the US and a desire to watch it burn.

We are calling for a massive breakup of the nation

 

[Quasar44]

No civil war as we all die

 

[miketx]

It exposes how corrupt and what a banana republic the USA is

Wow.....the conservative hatred of the US is really oozing out now.

I can promise you that Many Dems are going to wish T was back in office in 2 yrs !!
You can expect your state to collapse like California

California hasn't 'collapsed'. Remember.....you don't actually know what you're talking about.

Making your promises of the future a little underwhelming.

Everyone Is in mass exodus out of Illinois, New York and California

Then why is California the most populous state in the US? You know the US....the nation that you hate?

Again, your arguments are hamstrung by the fact that you just don't know what you're talking about.

You shit stains lie 24/7.

 

[Skylar]

Skylar is clearly an interesting guy
He is a committed leftist but a patriot ??
Unusual??
Do you support Antifa and Blm ???

No and yes.

 

[Skylar]

It exposes how corrupt and what a banana republic the USA is

Wow.....the conservative hatred of the US is really oozing out now.

I can promise you that Many Dems are going to wish T was back in office in 2 yrs !!
You can expect your state to collapse like California

California hasn't 'collapsed'. Remember.....you don't actually know what you're talking about.

Making your promises of the future a little underwhelming.

Everyone Is in mass exodus out of Illinois, New York and California

Then why is California the most populous state in the US? You know the US....the nation that you hate?

Again, your arguments are hamstrung by the fact that you just don't know what you're talking about.

You shit stains lie 24/7.

Is there some special OAN or NewMaxTv source you have on State populations you'd like to cite?

Because California is easily the most populous state in the union by any source I've been able to find.

Certainly more than Texas.

 

[HaShev]

Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.

www.newsmax.com

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.

"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.

"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."

Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.

Also today....from the judge that dismissed the Trump campaign's attempted injunction of the certification of the Pennsylvania election....

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

READ: Judge's order dismissing Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit | CNN Politics

Judge Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania dealt a death blow on Saturday to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's victory. Read Brann's order below.

www.cnn.com

The grand promises made by Powell on what evidence they have.......and the pathetic presentations void of that evidence in court, have nothing to do with other.

You can't even read your own post wording where the word "Rampant" is used then you conveniently lose sight of the word when saying no evidence of fraud (instead of saying no rampant evidence). THERE IS EVIDENCE, WHAT DO YOU THINK AFFIDAVITS TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES AND LITERAL VIDEO EVIDENCE IS.

Tossed out of court for being essentially worthless.

For example, Jesse Jacobs....the person cited in the disasterous pudding drip news conference. Her affidavit had already submitted and rejected by the courts for being too general and lacking specifics enough to be admissible...a week before Gulliani cited her.

“Ms. Jacob’s information is generalized. It asserts behavior with no date, location or frequency or names of employees,” he wrote. “In addition, [she] offers no indication of whether she took steps to address the alleged misconduct or to [alert] any supervisor about the alleged voter fraud. Ms. Jacob only came forward after the unofficial results of the voting indicated former Vice President Biden was the winner in the state of Michigan.”

Michigan Judge Rejects Challenge to Detroit Election Results

Finding that two voters’ claims about election fraud lack credibility, a Michigan judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit demanding an audit of results in the Detroit area.

www.courthousenews.com

But good luck with that 'checkmate move'.

The subjective court opinion in corrupt PA is there isn't rampant proof not that there is no proof, which is liken to saying there is no flip flop or lying in politics, it's so absurd to say that you'd be the fraud or delusional in saying it. Obama the great liar said it, the Fake news said it that way too for sake of narrative political tactical spin that insults the intelligence of the viewers, which is what you are doing.
Why would you need such tactical spin if everything is legit and you are so sure will go your way? You are not scared of something are you?
Like a checkmate move you never saw coming?
;-)

Or.....the affidavits don't back the accusations. If you're claiming, for example, that Dominion Software hacked the election.......but your affidavits are that one of the pollworkers was wearing a black lives T shirt (an actual example), the affidavit doesn't match the claim.

You don't seem to get the level of incompetence involved in Trump's legal efforts.

You lost your argument and validated mine, you used an ad hominem reply that used only 1 instance out of the many.

I don't think 'ad hominem' means what you think it means. My evisceration of your argument was based on evidence. Or more specifically, the lack of it to support Trump's claims.

Jesse Jacobs' affidavit was already long rejected as being uselessly general with no specific evidence of any wrong doing a week before Gulliani cited her in his disasterous news conference.

And Judge Matthew Brann tossed Trump's lawsuit in Pennsylvania because it lacked evidence.

Failure after failure demonstrates neither skill nor success. Trump's legal team is quite awful at this.

When you smokescreen to avoid answering especially when taking selective portions leaving out the whole issue= is an ad hominem response as was your insult.

I still don't think ad hominem means what you think it means. I'm not arguing that Trump is wrong because his counsel is terrible. I'm arguing that his counsel is incompetent because of the poor job they've done in court and their record of failure.

With examples. Gulliani citing the affidavit from a woman when that affidavit was *already* rejected for providing no specific evidence of wrong doing is incompetent.

Trump's lawyers submitting no evidence to support their allegations in the Pennsylvania injunction was incompetent. As their injunction failed miserably, the lawsuit being dismissed with prejudice. And this by a Republican judge.

Its the lack of evidence that renders Trump's legal effort a failure. And incompetence in his counsel to argue claims that they can't back up with evidence.

Fact: CNN stated there was no evidence of fraud instead of saying not enough to change the lead or significant enough to matter.
They had a week or so prior done a story on the fraud with a politicians arrest rigging his own election. CNN lied plain and simple, like you lied plain and simple, by way of word play used for propaganda. When you use such tactics to pander to a race of people to "pull the wool over their head" you are comitting a racist act, by claiming you think they are dumb enough to buy your malarkey. You are insulting them by using them, pandering through insulting means.
If you really believed your own subjective opinions then you would not do it in such a coniving & racist manner.

This was a legal finding by a Federal Judge. You can ignore it as 'subjective opinion'. But it doesn't change the fact that Trump's law suit was dismissed with prejudice.

Meaning he can't refile it with amendments. And the certification that he sought to prevent with the failed injunction attempt....is less than 24 hours away.

Your reply was once again an ad hominem smokescreen technique that did nothing for your case. How do you know the lawyers strategy isn't to use this judge's standard as precedence or evidence to use for a supreme court ruling. You are not seeing it in the bigger picture as a whole thus missing the future entrapment checkmate move. ;-)

 

[Skylar]

Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.

www.newsmax.com

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.

"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.

"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."

Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.

Also today....from the judge that dismissed the Trump campaign's attempted injunction of the certification of the Pennsylvania election....

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

READ: Judge's order dismissing Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit | CNN Politics

Judge Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania dealt a death blow on Saturday to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's victory. Read Brann's order below.

www.cnn.com

The grand promises made by Powell on what evidence they have.......and the pathetic presentations void of that evidence in court, have nothing to do with other.

You can't even read your own post wording where the word "Rampant" is used then you conveniently lose sight of the word when saying no evidence of fraud (instead of saying no rampant evidence). THERE IS EVIDENCE, WHAT DO YOU THINK AFFIDAVITS TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES AND LITERAL VIDEO EVIDENCE IS.

Tossed out of court for being essentially worthless.

For example, Jesse Jacobs....the person cited in the disasterous pudding drip news conference. Her affidavit had already submitted and rejected by the courts for being too general and lacking specifics enough to be admissible...a week before Gulliani cited her.

“Ms. Jacob’s information is generalized. It asserts behavior with no date, location or frequency or names of employees,” he wrote. “In addition, [she] offers no indication of whether she took steps to address the alleged misconduct or to [alert] any supervisor about the alleged voter fraud. Ms. Jacob only came forward after the unofficial results of the voting indicated former Vice President Biden was the winner in the state of Michigan.”

Michigan Judge Rejects Challenge to Detroit Election Results

Finding that two voters’ claims about election fraud lack credibility, a Michigan judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit demanding an audit of results in the Detroit area.

www.courthousenews.com

But good luck with that 'checkmate move'.

The subjective court opinion in corrupt PA is there isn't rampant proof not that there is no proof, which is liken to saying there is no flip flop or lying in politics, it's so absurd to say that you'd be the fraud or delusional in saying it. Obama the great liar said it, the Fake news said it that way too for sake of narrative political tactical spin that insults the intelligence of the viewers, which is what you are doing.
Why would you need such tactical spin if everything is legit and you are so sure will go your way? You are not scared of something are you?
Like a checkmate move you never saw coming?
;-)

Or.....the affidavits don't back the accusations. If you're claiming, for example, that Dominion Software hacked the election.......but your affidavits are that one of the pollworkers was wearing a black lives T shirt (an actual example), the affidavit doesn't match the claim.

You don't seem to get the level of incompetence involved in Trump's legal efforts.

You lost your argument and validated mine, you used an ad hominem reply that used only 1 instance out of the many.

I don't think 'ad hominem' means what you think it means. My evisceration of your argument was based on evidence. Or more specifically, the lack of it to support Trump's claims.

Jesse Jacobs' affidavit was already long rejected as being uselessly general with no specific evidence of any wrong doing a week before Gulliani cited her in his disasterous news conference.

And Judge Matthew Brann tossed Trump's lawsuit in Pennsylvania because it lacked evidence.

Failure after failure demonstrates neither skill nor success. Trump's legal team is quite awful at this.

When you smokescreen to avoid answering especially when taking selective portions leaving out the whole issue= is an ad hominem response as was your insult.

I still don't think ad hominem means what you think it means. I'm not arguing that Trump is wrong because his counsel is terrible. I'm arguing that his counsel is incompetent because of the poor job they've done in court and their record of failure.

With examples. Gulliani citing the affidavit from a woman when that affidavit was *already* rejected for providing no specific evidence of wrong doing is incompetent.

Trump's lawyers submitting no evidence to support their allegations in the Pennsylvania injunction was incompetent. As their injunction failed miserably, the lawsuit being dismissed with prejudice. And this by a Republican judge.

Its the lack of evidence that renders Trump's legal effort a failure. And incompetence in his counsel to argue claims that they can't back up with evidence.

Fact: CNN stated there was no evidence of fraud instead of saying not enough to change the lead or significant enough to matter.
They had a week or so prior done a story on the fraud with a politicians arrest rigging his own election. CNN lied plain and simple, like you lied plain and simple, by way of word play used for propaganda. When you use such tactics to pander to a race of people to "pull the wool over their head" you are comitting a racist act, by claiming you think they are dumb enough to buy your malarkey. You are insulting them by using them, pandering through insulting means.
If you really believed your own subjective opinions then you would not do it in such a coniving & racist manner.

This was a legal finding by a Federal Judge. You can ignore it as 'subjective opinion'. But it doesn't change the fact that Trump's law suit was dismissed with prejudice.

Meaning he can't refile it with amendments. And the certification that he sought to prevent with the failed injunction attempt....is less than 24 hours away.

Your reply was once again an ad hominem smokescreen technique that did nothing for your case. How do you know the lawyers strategy isn't to use this judge's standard as precedence or evidence to use for a supreme court ruling. You are not seeing it in the bigger picture as a whole thus missing the future entrapment checkmate move. ;-)

Nope. My reply was once again a systematic citation of the failures of Trump's legal team....with concise explanations why their arguments failed.

They lack evidence.

But don't take my word for it. Life long republican Federal Judge Matthew Brann makes the same argument when he dismissed Trump's lawsuit with prejudice:

One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence

Ignore as you will. Certification of Pennsylvania's vote is tomorrow.

 

[beagle9]

She hasn't committed to anyone since - I think she's a lesbo.

She's most likely committed to the case in court she's representing in court at the moment.
Married or dating or not, that's another sort of commitment.

Well without any evidence she's got her work cut out.
However, if she should pull it off I will take back all I said about her and apologise.
You must admit though she does look a few pence short of a shilling - something about the eyes!

That's a fair statement.

 

[NoNukes]

You stole a presidential election
There is no USA
USA is Venezuela

Trump is the one trying to steal it.

 

[justinacolmena]

Trump is the one trying to steal it.

No. Trump is insisting on the elctoral process which the Democrats are denying by going directly to the mass media with exit polls substituting for offical counts.

 

[dblack]

Trump should ditch Ghouliani and put this guy in charge of his lawsuit circus:

 

[Skylar]

Trump is the one trying to steal it.

No. Trump is insisting on the elctoral process which the Democrats are denying by going directly to the mass media with exit polls substituting for offical counts.

Actually, on. Trump insisted that we stop the count when there were millions of votes left uncounted.

Now that Trump lost, he's insisting that every voter in the State of Pennsylvania be thrown out. All 7 million of them.

 

[justinacolmena]

State of Pennsylvania

My great-grandmother might have spoken German, but the language would be scarcely recognizable in this day and age.

 

[HaShev]

Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.

www.newsmax.com

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.

"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.

"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."

Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.

Also today....from the judge that dismissed the Trump campaign's attempted injunction of the certification of the Pennsylvania election....

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

READ: Judge's order dismissing Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit | CNN Politics

Judge Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania dealt a death blow on Saturday to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's victory. Read Brann's order below.

www.cnn.com

The grand promises made by Powell on what evidence they have.......and the pathetic presentations void of that evidence in court, have nothing to do with other.

You can't even read your own post wording where the word "Rampant" is used then you conveniently lose sight of the word when saying no evidence of fraud (instead of saying no rampant evidence). THERE IS EVIDENCE, WHAT DO YOU THINK AFFIDAVITS TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES AND LITERAL VIDEO EVIDENCE IS.

Tossed out of court for being essentially worthless.

For example, Jesse Jacobs....the person cited in the disasterous pudding drip news conference. Her affidavit had already submitted and rejected by the courts for being too general and lacking specifics enough to be admissible...a week before Gulliani cited her.

“Ms. Jacob’s information is generalized. It asserts behavior with no date, location or frequency or names of employees,” he wrote. “In addition, [she] offers no indication of whether she took steps to address the alleged misconduct or to [alert] any supervisor about the alleged voter fraud. Ms. Jacob only came forward after the unofficial results of the voting indicated former Vice President Biden was the winner in the state of Michigan.”

Michigan Judge Rejects Challenge to Detroit Election Results

Finding that two voters’ claims about election fraud lack credibility, a Michigan judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit demanding an audit of results in the Detroit area.

www.courthousenews.com

But good luck with that 'checkmate move'.

The subjective court opinion in corrupt PA is there isn't rampant proof not that there is no proof, which is liken to saying there is no flip flop or lying in politics, it's so absurd to say that you'd be the fraud or delusional in saying it. Obama the great liar said it, the Fake news said it that way too for sake of narrative political tactical spin that insults the intelligence of the viewers, which is what you are doing.
Why would you need such tactical spin if everything is legit and you are so sure will go your way? You are not scared of something are you?
Like a checkmate move you never saw coming?
;-)

Or.....the affidavits don't back the accusations. If you're claiming, for example, that Dominion Software hacked the election.......but your affidavits are that one of the pollworkers was wearing a black lives T shirt (an actual example), the affidavit doesn't match the claim.

You don't seem to get the level of incompetence involved in Trump's legal efforts.

You lost your argument and validated mine, you used an ad hominem reply that used only 1 instance out of the many.

I don't think 'ad hominem' means what you think it means. My evisceration of your argument was based on evidence. Or more specifically, the lack of it to support Trump's claims.

Jesse Jacobs' affidavit was already long rejected as being uselessly general with no specific evidence of any wrong doing a week before Gulliani cited her in his disasterous news conference.

And Judge Matthew Brann tossed Trump's lawsuit in Pennsylvania because it lacked evidence.

Failure after failure demonstrates neither skill nor success. Trump's legal team is quite awful at this.

When you smokescreen to avoid answering especially when taking selective portions leaving out the whole issue= is an ad hominem response as was your insult.

I still don't think ad hominem means what you think it means. I'm not arguing that Trump is wrong because his counsel is terrible. I'm arguing that his counsel is incompetent because of the poor job they've done in court and their record of failure.

With examples. Gulliani citing the affidavit from a woman when that affidavit was *already* rejected for providing no specific evidence of wrong doing is incompetent.

Trump's lawyers submitting no evidence to support their allegations in the Pennsylvania injunction was incompetent. As their injunction failed miserably, the lawsuit being dismissed with prejudice. And this by a Republican judge.

Its the lack of evidence that renders Trump's legal effort a failure. And incompetence in his counsel to argue claims that they can't back up with evidence.

Fact: CNN stated there was no evidence of fraud instead of saying not enough to change the lead or significant enough to matter.
They had a week or so prior done a story on the fraud with a politicians arrest rigging his own election. CNN lied plain and simple, like you lied plain and simple, by way of word play used for propaganda. When you use such tactics to pander to a race of people to "pull the wool over their head" you are comitting a racist act, by claiming you think they are dumb enough to buy your malarkey. You are insulting them by using them, pandering through insulting means.
If you really believed your own subjective opinions then you would not do it in such a coniving & racist manner.

This was a legal finding by a Federal Judge. You can ignore it as 'subjective opinion'. But it doesn't change the fact that Trump's law suit was dismissed with prejudice.

Meaning he can't refile it with amendments. And the certification that he sought to prevent with the failed injunction attempt....is less than 24 hours away.

Your reply was once again an ad hominem smokescreen technique that did nothing for your case. How do you know the lawyers strategy isn't to use this judge's standard as precedence or evidence to use for a supreme court ruling. You are not seeing it in the bigger picture as a whole thus missing the future entrapment checkmate move. ;-)

Nope. My reply was once again a systematic citation of the failures of Trump's legal team....with concise explanations why their arguments failed.

They lack evidence.

But don't take my word for it. Life long republican Federal Judge Matthew Brann makes the same argument when he dismissed Trump's lawsuit with prejudice:

One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence

Ignore as you will. Certification of Pennsylvania's vote is tomorrow.

You proved my point;
1)you don't know the evidence put forth, and you are using subjective opinion.
2)your opinion would change if you went to vote and someone told you that you already voted and were prevented your right to vote.
3) you comitted fraud to argue there is no fraud.
4)your argument keeps using 1 selective argument that is subjective and does not refute the charges, especially since mose people would never know their vote was stolen or rejected. Example the person purposely told to vote in the wrong district, or the ones told not to sign their walk in ballot. Once they leave they never know the attendant rejects their ballot to be witness or report the fraud which you claim doesn't exist.
5)which brings us to your belief in zombies, because you believe dead people can vote is not fraud thus they must be zombies. So how long have you believed zombies are real?
6)an illegitimate "lawless" party can't argue about the kaw that which they never follow, nor elect someone as their candidate that committed 2 now 3 counts of treason. If you believed and actually followed the law then you'd know he would be impeachable day 1 for his participation in treasonous acts, abuses, and corruption.
7)do you obey the law? If not then how can you argue about court cases if laws don't apply in your wonderland to anyone, and your candidate is above the law?

 

[airplanemechanic]

My hate of the left is far higher than Isis times the Nazis

Your hate of the US is obvious. Otherwise, why would you have made this statement: "It exposes how corrupt and what a banana republic the USA is?"

The hatred for the USA among conservatives is epidemic.

Yes , I utterly hate what the nation has become with the big tech censorships , fake Soviet news, corruption not seen since the Roman Empire!!

We must break it up

Nope. We won't be doing that.

Great nation collapse after a certain period of time and USA is a fake nation!!
We break up or we have a second CW and I die and you

No, we're not doing that.

Two problems with your analysis; 1) You're too blinded by your hatred of the USA to be rational 2) There's no need for our nation to split up.

You can’t have a nation where both sides have utter hate and contempt for the other side

And who says 'both sides have utter hate and contempt for each other'?

You may be projecting your own hate and contempt. Especially given how much you loathe the good ol' US of A.

The news is 24/7 hate of conservatives, Christianity and white males
My side is no different

Or....you're so mired in hate for the USA, that you see nothing but hatred. And of course, your own victimhood.

Typical leftie, accusing the other side of exactly what you are guilty of.

You always accuse the right of "hating America" yet it is YOU who votes for a candidate who says they want to "fundamentally change America."

Sounds to me as if YOUR SIDE hates America. We're fine with it just as it is, we don't need to change it.

 

[Skylar]

My hate of the left is far higher than Isis times the Nazis

Your hate of the US is obvious. Otherwise, why would you have made this statement: "It exposes how corrupt and what a banana republic the USA is?"

The hatred for the USA among conservatives is epidemic.

Yes , I utterly hate what the nation has become with the big tech censorships , fake Soviet news, corruption not seen since the Roman Empire!!

We must break it up

Nope. We won't be doing that.

Great nation collapse after a certain period of time and USA is a fake nation!!
We break up or we have a second CW and I die and you

No, we're not doing that.

Two problems with your analysis; 1) You're too blinded by your hatred of the USA to be rational 2) There's no need for our nation to split up.

You can’t have a nation where both sides have utter hate and contempt for the other side

And who says 'both sides have utter hate and contempt for each other'?

You may be projecting your own hate and contempt. Especially given how much you loathe the good ol' US of A.

The news is 24/7 hate of conservatives, Christianity and white males
My side is no different

Or....you're so mired in hate for the USA, that you see nothing but hatred. And of course, your own victimhood.

Typical leftie, accusing the other side of exactly what you are guilty of.

You always accuse the right of "hating America" yet it is YOU who votes for a candidate who says they want to "fundamentally change America."

Sounds to me as if YOUR SIDE hates America. We're fine with it just as it is, we don't need to change it.

Dems believe in a more perfect union.

We're making America great again.

 

[Leo123]

Sidney Powell: 'Biblical' Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case.

www.newsmax.com

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a "biblical" voter fraud case this week.

"We've got tons of evidence; it's so much, it's hard to pull it all together," Powell told Saturday night's "The Count" co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.

"Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical."

Looking forward to seeing what she does. I'm betting the GOP is deep into this cheating as well. They never wanted Trump to begin with. He's been battling this by himself with no help from them.

The MSM will likely not cover it or, if they do, they will do their best to denigrate Powell and trot out a line of so-called 'experts' to create a faux-objective, 'dog-and-pony show' analysis that will inevitably declare Biden the 'winner.' They have no interest in the truth or facts.

 

[Quasar44]

State of Pennsylvania

My great-grandmother might have spoken German, but the language would be scarcely recognizable in this day and age.

Mine spoke Yiddish

 

[Quasar44]

My hate of the left is far higher than Isis times the Nazis

Your hate of the US is obvious. Otherwise, why would you have made this statement: "It exposes how corrupt and what a banana republic the USA is?"

The hatred for the USA among conservatives is epidemic.

Yes , I utterly hate what the nation has become with the big tech censorships , fake Soviet news, corruption not seen since the Roman Empire!!

We must break it up

Nope. We won't be doing that.

Great nation collapse after a certain period of time and USA is a fake nation!!
We break up or we have a second CW and I die and you

No, we're not doing that.

Two problems with your analysis; 1) You're too blinded by your hatred of the USA to be rational 2) There's no need for our nation to split up.

You can’t have a nation where both sides have utter hate and contempt for the other side

And who says 'both sides have utter hate and contempt for each other'?

You may be projecting your own hate and contempt. Especially given how much you loathe the good ol' US of A.

The news is 24/7 hate of conservatives, Christianity and white males
My side is no different

Or....you're so mired in hate for the USA, that you see nothing but hatred. And of course, your own victimhood.

Typical leftie, accusing the other side of exactly what you are guilty of.

You always accuse the right of "hating America" yet it is YOU who votes for a candidate who says they want to "fundamentally change America."

Sounds to me as if YOUR SIDE hates America. We're fine with it just as it is, we don't need to change it.

Dems believe in a more perfect union.

We're making America great again.

So
You want the following :
Defunding of cops
Zero borders
No ice
More taxes
Trillions in green deals
End of coal
????