TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #21
She only needs a transplant because of her psychopath parents.Yes. But no. They should have tried, but no surgery like that comes with a 100% guarantee. So probably she couldn't win.If she had died, should they have been held responsible?I know. I read it.because of a heart defect doctors say could have been fixed if her parents had simply trusted modern medicinefrom OP : The 20-year-old Idaho woman can only hope for organ transplants that could save her life, even though they may do little to stem the bitterness she feels toward her parents and the religious sect they belong to.The damage her parents did was before she was 18.
Seems to me, she can still get surgery and be ok.
And they didn't cause the damage, like you implied. They just relied on delusion to fix her.
This is why she will probably lose:
Under Idaho’s 1972 “Child Protective Act,” parents are immune from prosecution for any charges – including involuntary manslaughter and negligent homicide – if they depend exclusively on faith healing. The law states that “no child whose parent or guardian chooses for such child treatment by prayers through spiritual means alone shall be deemed for that reason alone to be neglected or lack parental care.”
So in Idaho, if you kill your kids all you have to say is it was what Jesus wanted and you can get off scot free.