Otis Mayfield
Diamond Member
- Sep 17, 2021
- 4,904
- 4,832
- 1,893
Even people who share “fake news” stories typically never read (or even click on) them. That is, people are not sharing the content because they read the stories, grew convinced of their factual accuracy, and are genuinely trying to inform others. Instead, people typically share these stories based on their headlines, for a whole host of social reasons, while recognizing them to be of questionable accuracy (see here, here, here, here and here for more on this).
No, America is not on the brink of a civil war | Musa al-Gharbi
So, there's this study (first link) that says when you make a post, like we do here on USMB, people will only read the title. Often, they won't click on your link or read the article.
So, a catchy title is everything. The link can lead to lies, misinformation or whatever, nobody will read it.
Often, the poster knows the source is questionable. The poster is only interested in the title too.
I'm sure there's one or two of you who read everything, but you are very much the exception.
Do you believe this?
No, America is not on the brink of a civil war | Musa al-Gharbi
So, there's this study (first link) that says when you make a post, like we do here on USMB, people will only read the title. Often, they won't click on your link or read the article.
So, a catchy title is everything. The link can lead to lies, misinformation or whatever, nobody will read it.
Often, the poster knows the source is questionable. The poster is only interested in the title too.
I'm sure there's one or two of you who read everything, but you are very much the exception.
Do you believe this?