Zone1 Well regulated militia

It does not say "organized militia" but "well regulated militia".
And back then, the wording "well regulated" means practiced and fully functioning.
Like in a "well regulated" clock.
I agree.
 
where did it list only one??

"arms" is plural,,

When the 2nd amendment says:
{... “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” ...}
It only gave one justification for denying federal jurisdiction.
That an armed and practiced Militia is necessary for the security of a free republic.
But there obviously are other reasons as well.
They were mentioning how the defense of country would be dependent upon the ability to quickly call up an armed militia.
But you also want an armed population for crime, pirates, subversion, and lots of other reasons as well.
 
That is ridiculous since the "well regulated militia" is everyone in a republic.
And the fact a "well regulated militia" needs firearm access without federal interference is not the ONLY reason why the feds were banned any firearm jurisdiction by the 2nd amendment.
It is just ONE of the many reasons.
But the 2nd amendment only listed 1 because you only need 1.
1734153385887.webp


It says I have the right "to keep and bear arms' which means more than one.

SMILE



:)
 
I saw a comment on YouTube which sums it up -

In the UK one of the freedoms we don't have is the right to bear arms, and in all my 66 years I've never met a single person who actually wants that particular freedom, especially when we've seen the effects of that 'freedom' in America.
 
I saw a comment on YouTube which sums it up -

In the UK one of the freedoms we don't have is the right to bear arms, and in all my 66 years I've never met a single person who actually wants that particular freedom, especially when we've seen the effects of that 'freedom' in America.
You all wanted it damned badly in 1940 when the Germans were twenty miles away. You were begging for American arms then. No one has even contemplated invading the USA since 1812. I believe it was Yamamoto who said if Japan invaded the USA there would be a rifleman behind every blade of grass. Armed people are free people, disarmed people are subjects.
 
I saw a comment on YouTube which sums it up -

In the UK one of the freedoms we don't have is the right to bear arms, and in all my 66 years I've never met a single person who actually wants that particular freedom, especially when we've seen the effects of that 'freedom' in America.
Knife attacks way up to eh?
 
Knife attacks way up to eh?
Knife deaths per capita US 0.53 and UK 0.08


You win on those figures too. Countries with high gun ownership have high knife crime too.
 
15th post
Knife deaths per capita US 0.53 and UK 0.08


You win on those figures too. Countries with high gun ownership have high knife crime too.

Think so?

Knife attacks way up to eh?

Has knife crime increased in the UK?

Figures released by the Office For National Statistics today reveal that knife-enabled crime in England and Wales has risen by 4% in the year ending March 2024, with police recording 50,510 offences. This marks a significant 78% increase over the past decade.Jul 24, 2024



Knife crime in the UK has become an increasingly pressing concern, with recent data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealing a 7% rise in offences involving knives or sharp instruments in 2023 compared to the previous year. This increase reflects a troubling trend that has reignited national debate, particularly following the tragic deaths of three young girls in Southport—a horrific event that has shocked the nation and underscored the urgent need for effective solutions.

 
Back
Top Bottom