How about Saudi then that is an Islamic state, with many racist laws and naziesque traditions. How many more Islamic states are racist and follow the teachings of NAZISM .
Or are you saying that islam is not civilised so has no place in modern society
Not going to get a response from the Racist Pro Palestinian . What about Abbas saying No Israelis Allowed. ? Meanwhile Israel does have Arabs . Consider the source.
Cor, you are demanding.
Do you have any idea how many posts there is on this site before I stumble over yours?
Or do you imagine I sit with finger poised, but just refusing to respond, rather than doing something more useful?
Ok.
Listen up.
Any state that claims to be exclusively for one religion is a Bad Thing.
Islamic states are not necessarily as you claim, exclusively for Islamic people. Just like Christian states are not necessarily exclusively for Christian people.
Israel is demanding to be recognised as a Jewish State, when it is not even prepared to define what it means by that. "First recognise it, then we will tell you what you have agreed to" is their attitude.
Has anyone ever asked you to sign a blank cheque, and told you they would fill in the amount later? What did / would you say?
Israel does not even ITSELF recognise Israel as a Jewish state. Bibi is trying to get some legislation through now, to do that.
Israel does not demand that Britain, the US, Russia or ANY OTHER STATE recognises Israel as a Jewish state.
Now, why should Palestine be the first, when no one has even bothered to define what it means?
BTW, Palestine has formally recognised Israel and agreed to its right to exist multiple times.
Has Israel recognised Palestine and agreed to its right to exist yet? Or do they still keep trying steal bits, until there is nothing left?
O.K. Listen up
Tell us why we should recognize a " palestinian state" but not a Jewish one.
How Many Muslim Countries Are There in the World? - Ask.com
There are 57 recognized Arab/ Muslim Countries. Why can't there be a Jewish State?
Tell us why Abbas states NO ISRAELIS ALLOWED! Don't you find that racist? Of course you don't
Your " claim" that Islamic States have more then one religion is laughable. Look at what is going on in the Muslim World with Christians who practice their religion. In the " civilized" Arab World like Saudi Arabia Christians can't practice their religions freely.
In the Jewish State of Israel there are other religions. These are practiced freely
You claim that Palestine has recognized Israel?

Not true
Is the Arab Peace Plan Really About Peace? « Commentary Magazine
Is the Arab Peace Plan Really About Peace?
Jonathan S. Tobin | @tobincommentary
05.01.2013 - 12:00 PM
Secretary of State John Kerry hailed the idea of reviving the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative put forward yesterday in Washington by a delegation from the Arab League. Kerry, who reportedly is hoping to host a multi-party peace conference this spring, was pleased that Qatars foreign minister had suggested that the proposal might be modified from its original take-it-or-leave-it demand that Israel return to the 1967 lines to one that allowed for a mutually-agreed minor swap of land that would modify the border.
This is progress of a sort, and should not be entirely dismissed. But before those advocating for more Israeli concessions in response to the proposal get too excited, its important to remember why this initiative flopped the first time around: its not really a peace proposal.
While the Arab Peace Initiative continues to be cited by Israels critics as proof that the Jewish state really does have partners, this idea has always been more about polishing the image of the Arab world in the United States than anything else. Conceived in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks when the Arab states, and in particular Saudi Arabia, were viewed with disgust by most Americans, the initiative was part of an effort to rehabilitate their image. But despite the fact that New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman (who claimed it stemmed from a conversation he had with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah) and others in the foreign policy community promoted the idea, it fizzled. Why? Because it was not an invitation to negotiate, but a diktat. Even worse, it contained a vital poison pill: the return of Palestinian refugees to Israel that would, in effect, mean the end of the Jewish state, not peace with it.
While the initiative does not specifically mention the so-called right of return by which the descendants of the Arab refugees of 1948 would be allowed to enter Israel, Prince Abdullah made this clear when he said this on the day the Arab League adopted the proposal:
I propose that the Arab summit put forward a clear and unanimous initiative addressed to the United Nations security council based on two basic issues: normal relations and security for Israel in exchange for full withdrawal from all occupied Arab territories, recognition of an independent Palestinian state with al-Quds al-Sharif as its capital, and the return of refugees.
Tell us please what the Palestinians are doing to " negotiate"
Israel isn't trying to " streal" anything. They are not going to go back to Borders that were never recognized in the first place ( the same way you claim Israel has never demanded they be recognized as a Jewish State which is a lie ) give up E. Jerusalem where their most religious sites are and allow " Right of Return" which would eventually annex Israel to Palestine
Declaration of Establishment of State of Israel
Your " claim" that Israel was not established to be a Jewish State is also a lie.
Freedom of Religion in Saudi Arabia
His example of " Freedom of Religion"

Can you imagine if this was Israel???