Democracy: Syncretic In The Middle East

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
132,640
Reaction score
68,311
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1. Democracy: Democracy is a system of government in which the whole population or all eligible members of a state participate, typically through elected representatives.
AI Overview
The 22 Arab countries, which are members of the Arab League and span North Africa and the Middle East, are: Algeria, Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.


None are democracies.




2. Israel, a dedicated Jewish nation, is a democracy with 2 million Arab citizens.




3.If we have a 2-state solution, it would be a 23rd Arab non-democracy.
In 2005 Israel gave West Bank and Gaze to the Arabs.
2006 the elected a terrorist Hamas to rule.
2007 they did what they always do, began killing Jews and demanding the eradication of Israele




4. West Bank and Gaza have some 4 million Muslims. If Israel absorbed the territories, as it should (Judea and Sumaria), as a democracy, the Arab population would vote in an Arab nation.




5. Gaza and West Bank should become a protectorate of Israel, no votinig rights, no democracy.
A protectorate is a dependent territory or small country that receives diplomatic or military protection from a stronger state in exchange for submitting to its control, particularly regarding foreign relations.Google.
 

Attachments

  • 1775761891312.webp
    1775761891312.webp
    3 KB · Views: 50
Democracy - what Iran was before we, the United States, helped the pro Israel mass murdering dictator the Shah seize and hold power

Conservative foreign policy is non interventionalist. Iran is 180 degrees the opposite direction. Had we stayed out of it, instead of bending to the will of Zionist Fascism, that democracy might still be there.

Everything the Zionist Fascists spew out about Iran is 100% on them. All lies, 100% about israel, 0% about America.
 
Democracy - what Iran was before we, the United States, helped the pro Israel mass murdering dictator the Shah seize and hold power

Conservative foreign policy is non interventionalist. Iran is 180 degrees the opposite direction. Had we stayed out of it, instead of bending to the will of Zionist Fascism, that democracy might still be there.

Everything the Zionist Fascists spew out about Iran is 100% on them. All lies, 100% about israel, 0% about America.
I never mind teaching your sort the history that government school corrupted.



1. When the Iranian revolution came to power, with the help of Democratic President Jimmy Carter, the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years. Khomeini followed this by sending hundreds of thousands of Iranians to die in the Iran-Iraq war, as martyrdom was needed to resurrect the Islamic Empire. [/]
Paul Berman, Terror and Liberalism, p. 108
Irrigating the earth with human blood.

Peaceful?

2. Outlined by Dr. Hans-Peter Raddatz, Orientalist, this blood-lust was the explanation of Irans demand for a truce, when it was learned that Iraq planned to kill the waves of Iranians with Tabun and Sarin nerve gas, which would not cause blood to flow. Glazov, United in Hate, p. 107-108.

Peaceful??

3. We should by now have become used to the death cult that is thriving at the fringes of the Muslim world. This is the cult of people who are proud to declare, "You love life, but we love death." This is the cult that sent waves of defenseless children to be mowed down on the battlefields of the Iran-Iraq war, that trains kindergartners to become bombs, that fetishizes death, that sends people off joyfully to commit mass murder. Because the death cult is not really about the cause it purports to serve. It's about the sheer pleasure of killing and dying. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/07/opinion/07brooks.html


After reading this stuff, you really seem the idiot, don't you?
 
the Ayatollah Khomeini killed more human beings (about twenty thousand) in two weeks than had been killed by the Shah during his entire thirty-eight years




another Zionist Fascist Lie.

The Shah killed tens of thousands who supported democracy.

Her defense of the Shah is exemplary that she never wanted a free democratic Iran, just the opposite.
 
another Zionist Fascist Lie.

The Shah killed tens of thousands who supported democracy.

Her defense of the Shah is exemplary that she never wanted a free democratic Iran, just the opposite.
Everything I post is linked and documented.

So you are a government school grad, huh?
 
another Zionist Fascist Lie.

The Shah killed tens of thousands who supported democracy.

Her defense of the Shah is exemplary that she never wanted a free democratic Iran, just the opposite.
Comparative Killings: When including the 1979 revolution's immediate aftermath and subsequent purges, the Islamic Republic under Khomeini executed more people in a shorter timeframe than the Shah did in decades.
Google
 
Comparative Killings: When including the 1979 revolution's immediate aftermath and subsequent purges, the Islamic Republic under Khomeini executed more people in a shorter timeframe than the Shah did in decades.
Google



LOL!!!!

Google says so!!!
 
You’re fulla Shiite as usual, repeating Islamonazi propaganda.



Again, the Zionist Fascist Traitor insists, dictatorship over democracy, as long as the dictator is Pro Israel...


 
Again, the Zionist Fascist Traitor insists, dictatorship over democracy, as long as the dictator is Pro Israel...


Shadap you ignorant buffoon, you don’t even know what these terms mean, if you did you’d realize it best applies to your side and the animals you support.
 
Another moronic thread.

Iran once had a democracy.

Until:
1775840448410.webp


Few events in modern Middle Eastern history have left as deep a scar as the coup of August 1953 that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored. For many Iranians, the coup became the symbol of Western betrayal, setting the stage for decades of anti-imperialism and fueling the anger that erupted in the 1979 revolution.

Britain and America: From Rivalry to Collaboration

Initially, Britain sought to manage the crisis alone. British leaders hoped to topple Mosaddegh and reinstall a pliant government. They planned covert operations but lacked the ability to act without U.S. support.

The CIA, under Allen Dulles, and MI6 together devised a plan: Operation Ajax. Its aim was to depose Mosaddegh and strengthen the Shah. Kermit Roosevelt, a grandson of Theodore Roosevelt, was chosen to lead the covert operation in Tehran.

Legacy: Roots of Resentment

The coup’s consequences were profound.

Domestic Authoritarianism: The Shah, restored to power, ruled with increasing autocracy for the next 25 years. His reliance on Western backing and his creation of SAVAK deepened repression.

National Humiliation: The coup became a collective memory of betrayal. When revolution erupted in 1979, chants of “Death to America” and “Death to England” drew directly on the memory of 1953.

Cold War Geopolitics: For Washington, Iran became a key ally, hosting U.S. military bases and serving as a pillar of containment. Yet the very alliance sowed the seeds of future estrangement.

Oil Nationalism: Although Mosaddegh was defeated, the principle of oil sovereignty remained powerful. Later OPEC revolts against Western oil companies drew inspiration from Iran’s example.

Enduring Distrust: The coup poisoned U.S.–Iran relations. Even today, Iranian leaders cite 1953 as proof of American duplicity. For many Iranians, the coup explains why foreign influence must be resisted at all costs.

Conclusion

The coup of 1953 was a turning point in modern Iran. It crushed a democratic experiment, restored an autocratic Shah, and reasserted Western control over oil. For the United States and Britain, it was a Cold War victory; for Iranians, it was a national trauma. Its legacy shaped the revolutionary anger of 1979 and continues to color relations between Iran and the West.


Polichic is An example that shows us how low intelligence Asians are admitted into Ivy League institutions because of the same Affirmative Action and DEI that this dumb ho opposes.
 
So the 'democratic' nation of Israel has some 40% of its population that can't vote? Doesn't sound so democratic to me.
I believe I have made clear that lying scum like you is not welcome in my threads,Vermin.
 
1. Democracy: Democracy is a system of government in which the whole population or all eligible members of a state participate, typically through elected representatives.
AI Overview
The 22 Arab countries, which are members of the Arab League and span North Africa and the Middle East, are: Algeria, Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.


None are democracies.




2. Israel, a dedicated Jewish nation, is a democracy with 2 million Arab citizens.




3.If we have a 2-state solution, it would be a 23rd Arab non-democracy.
In 2005 Israel gave West Bank and Gaze to the Arabs.
2006 the elected a terrorist Hamas to rule.
2007 they did what they always do, began killing Jews and demanding the eradication of Israele




4. West Bank and Gaza have some 4 million Muslims. If Israel absorbed the territories, as it should (Judea and Sumaria), as a democracy, the Arab population would vote in an Arab nation.




5. Gaza and West Bank should become a protectorate of Israel, no votinig rights, no democracy.
A protectorate is a dependent territory or small country that receives diplomatic or military protection from a stronger state in exchange for submitting to its control, particularly regarding foreign relations.Google.
 
15th post
So the 'democratic' nation of Israel has some 40% of its population that can't vote? Doesn't sound so democratic to me.
It doesn't sound democratic to you because those in question are not citizens of Israel. Why would non-citizens have the right to vote? They are under the governing authority of the wanna-be State of Palestine. They can't vote because their government is not, in point of fact, a democracy and doesn't hold elections.

I'm going to say this again for those screaming apartheid AND occupation. Those are mutually exclusive terms. It can not be both apartheid (unequal treatment of citizens) and occupation (military control over someone else's sovereign citizens).

We are in this weird quasi-sort of State of Palestine because the Arabs continue to refuse to do the work of state creation and peace with neighbors.
 
It doesn't sound democratic to you because those in question are not citizens of Israel. Why would non-citizens have the right to vote? They are under the governing authority of the wanna-be State of Palestine. They can't vote because their government is not, in point of fact, a democracy and doesn't hold elections.

I'm going to say this again for those screaming apartheid AND occupation. Those are mutually exclusive terms. It can not be both apartheid (unequal treatment of citizens) and occupation (military control over someone else's sovereign citizens).

We are in this weird quasi-sort of State of Palestine because the Arabs continue to refuse to do the work of state creation and peace with neighbors.
I think if you are under the political authority of a democratic country, you deserve some say in how you are governed.
 
I think if you are under the political authority of a democratic country, you deserve some say in how you are governed.
How do you define "political authority" and "governed"?

This is not meant to be a trick question. This is me trying to understand your reasoning.
 
Back
Top Bottom