hahah I said there wasn't any...you are the idiot that claimed the Courts ruled it Unconsitutionally vague! Not me....I said it was still good law....Let’s see the case law then.
Keep walking it back....walk on back...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
hahah I said there wasn't any...you are the idiot that claimed the Courts ruled it Unconsitutionally vague! Not me....I said it was still good law....Let’s see the case law then.
You claimed 793(f) is prosecuted.hahah I said there wasn't any...you are the idiot that claimed the Courts ruled it Unconsitutionally vague! Not me....I said it was still good law....
Keep walking it back....walk on back...
Of course it is, it's Federal law. You claimed it was found to be UnConstitutionally vague. Yet haven't provided us with the case that found that.You claimed 793(f) is prosecuted.
If that’s true, then there is case law.
You’re making contradictory claims.
I never claimed the courts declared it unconstitutionally vague. You lied.
… which democrats haven’t done over the past 6 years. And now that they/you don’t have complete control, they’re/you’re playing victimIt has been done for over two hundred years
It is called bipartisanship and compromise
Show me where I claimed the courts found it unconstitutional.Of course it is, it's Federal law. You claimed it was found to be UnConstitutionally vague. Yet haven't provided us with the case that found that.
Keep walking it back
Sure...Show me where I claimed the courts found it unconstitutional.
Gross negligence has never been prosecuted independently because it was unconstitutionally vague.
I thought you guys didn’t want Clinton be given special treatment?
Low level FBI agents don’t make prosecution decisions.
Patriotic heroes don’t leak to the press.
Comey was a lying sack of shit and his sorry ass should be in JAIL.Coney wasn’t a low level FBI agent, moron.
He has a JD from U of Chicago. He spent nearly 20 years as a prosecutor and eventually the DAG before becoming the director of the FBI.
An experienced prosecutor has a real opinion about cases. These low level FBI agents don’t even have law degrees.
Notice how that statement says nothing about the courts finding it unconditionally vague.It's amazing how you can lie so easily, you literally just said that yesterday....
the DOJ does not have that authority only the courts do retard.Notice how that statement says nothing about the courts finding it unconditionally vague.
The DoJ considers it unconstitutionally vague and so that’s why they never prosecute it, as I said.
Thanks for showing that you are either a liar or a moron.
The DoJ has the authority to decide who is charged with what.the DOJ does not have that authority only the courts do retard.
hahah the Courts are the only ones that can say it's unConstitutionally vague. The Courts decide that. Geez.Notice how that statement says nothing about the courts finding it unconditionally vague.
The DoJ considers it unconstitutionally vague and so that’s why they never prosecute it, as I said.
Thanks for showing that you are either a liar or a moron.
It was in the testimony that you brought up.hahah the Courts are the only ones that can say it's unConstitutionally vague. The Courts decide that. Geez.
Show me some memo from the DOJ saying that then....
With all due respect, Marener? Can you name another instance when the husband of someone accused of what Hillary was accused of, met secretly with a sitting Attorney General to work out a deal? Hillary was NEVER going to be treated like everyone else! She was caught red handed running the State Department through hidden servers to avoid Congressional oversight and her response to that was to attempt to destroy the evidence of what she'd been doing! Bill Clinton's meeting with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac in Arizona resulted in the DOJ's decision not to bring charges against Clinton with James Comey claiming that Hillary wasn't "sophisticated" enough to understand that she'd been doing something wrong...one of the most unbelievable things an FBI Director has EVER uttered!So 793(f). That’s something you should probably know. But sadly you’re the dumbest fake lawyer in the world.
793(f) is not prosecuted by the DoJ. There is no case law because they don’t prosecute it.
To charge Clinton with 793(f) would be treating her differently (worse) then anyone else. The right claims they want her treated like everyone else, therefore she wasn’t charged.
During the campaign, what did Trump say when asked if he would "...accept the results of the election?" What did he say? WHAT DID HE FUCKING SAY!It obviously is.
Bengazi WAS a witch hunt that proved nothing!hahah yeah because Bengazi had nothing to do with national security or foreign policy...hahahhah
He didn't do shit for 3 hours because that's how he planned it.He offered the National Guard the day BEFORE the riot, Billo! Try to keep up...will ya'!
No it would not!Yeah, because the Chinese Communist Party having something on the President's son that could land him in jail wouldn't create a national security issue! (eye roll) Just how naive are you, Billo?
So he offered the National Guard and that was part of his "plan"? LOL Really, Billo?He didn't do shit for 3 hours because that's how he planned it.
Wow, you really ARE that naive!No it would not!