Iranian woman, who has lived in US for 47 years, taken by Ice while gardening

Apparently a marriage of convenience DOES impact an alien's attempt to become legal. It says that:

"this marriage was denied under INA § 204(c) which precludes approval based on even an admittedly good-faith union if the petitioner had previously contracted an improper marriage."

Yes I know what it says, but the point is that the 204(c) clause is not legal.
You can only punish people when they harm the right of others.
An improper marriage harms no one, so cannot be used to harm her.
And even if it did, the anchor baby still makes deportation illegal.
 
That would make sense if she had been guilty of some crime, but she wasn't.
It was the US who was guilty of destroying the democracy in Iran.
And then the US should have at least felt some responsibility for those Iranian refugees we created when the Shah we installed was defeated in 1979.
We didn’t destroy their democracy, they didn’t have one. They chose the Imam over the Sha. We don’t owe them a ******* thing.
 

Is gardening a euphamism got making bombs ? I cant say. But if Iran is the great Satan then this woman is worthy of protection.

Are the ICE goons just picking low hanging frruit while the real problems are elsewhere ?
Who can say.
STFU retarded britt
 
Yes I know what it says, but the point is that the 204(c) clause is not legal.
You can only punish people when they harm the right of others.
An improper marriage harms no one, so cannot be used to harm her.
And even if it did, the anchor baby still makes deportation illegal.
The woman can be deported. Claiming that the law is illegal is a desperate argument.
 
Just kicked the shit out of hamas, hezbollah, yemen and iran.

And here you are whining about things you have no proof of.. which is that she always met the requirements.

They are not immigration officials.

Maybe they should go too. :thup:
Which one of Israel's three war aims has been met?

David Hearst - Israel's failure to subdue Iran shows it can no longer dictate the regional order - Brave New Europe

"Israel sustained more damage from Iran’s missiles in 12 days than it did from two years of Hamas’s homegrown rockets, or indeed from months of war with Hezbollah.

"In 12 days, Israeli crews have come to grips with the sort of damage to apartment blocks that before only Israeli planes had inflicted on Gaza and Lebanon – and it’s been something of a shock.

"Strategic targets have been hit, including an oil refinery and a power station. Iran has also reported strikes on Israeli military facilities, although Israel’s strict censorship regime makes these assertions difficult to verify."

Greedy, racist Jews in Israel finally hit an enemy big enough to hit back, then went running to Trump begging for a ceasefire.
 
Wrong.
It is the fact she fits all the criteria.
She was forced to leave Iran due to the US angering Iran with the Shah, so meets the political asylum criteria.
She married a US citizen so meets the marriage criteria.
She had an anchor baby in the US, so meets that criteria.
Progressive love the huge and strong central government. There is a shady side though. In the WW 2 era our law enforcement, security, spy agencies, etc. were enacted into power and/or became much stronger. The CIA installed the Shah. When it comes to immigration here, like many other issues there are a few who can fall through the cracks. Progs have no problems using the megaphones when this happens. And we end up expanding agendas with huge resource increases for little improvement then repeat the process over and over.
 

Is gardening a euphamism got making bombs ? I cant say. But if Iran is the great Satan then this woman is worthy of protection.

Are the ICE goons just picking low hanging frruit while the real problems are elsewhere ?
Who can say.
was she here legally or illegally? that is the only issue that matters.
 

Is gardening a euphamism got making bombs ? I cant say. But if Iran is the great Satan then this woman is worthy of protection.

Are the ICE goons just picking low hanging frruit while the real problems are elsewhere ?
Who can say.
Great news. Thanks for posting. Yes, you're not even safe gardening anymore.
 
Shocking that the British could execute a person just for making valid radio sarcasm.
England is one of the most corrupt countries in the history of the planet, with its colonial imperialism, constant wars, fascism, racism, and aristocratic inequality.
The only country worse is the US.

You really are in "The Twilight Zone," aren't ya, lol. And so, executing an out, and out, traitor is a bad thing? But, impeaching and calling a patriotic President a FACIST is a good thing, right.......lol.

Sigh, consistency is certainly NOT your forte-)
 
Yes I know what it says, but the point is that the 204(c) clause is not legal.
You can only punish people when they harm the right of others.
An improper marriage harms no one, so cannot be used to harm her.
And even if it did, the anchor baby still makes deportation illegal.
An anchor baby does not give automatic legal status to the mother. A marriage of convenience can falsely harm other petitioners by cutting in line.
 
It's likely a fake story. Or the office couldn't close the file cabinet because of her thick and on growing file in it. Someone said this is only going to get worse because she doesn't want to make it better. Time to get rid of her.
 
15th post
GuemCtaXkAAdxFG


@ Elon Musk.

Here are 5 things I accomplished this week.

1. Obliterated Iran’s nuke program.
2. Defeated a Marxist Judicial Coup.
3. Became everyone’s Daddy.
4. Hit an all time S&P 500 high.
5. Deported Maryland Man again and 21K others.
 
Back
Top Bottom