Iranian woman, who has lived in US for 47 years, taken by Ice while gardening

I agree that it appears to be ridiculous,

Yes, and you are a purveyor of ridiculousness, because you have no clue of her inside workings. But those who took her? They do and no court can stop it.

And also, Garcia will never see his way out of incarceration ... in whatever country the US finally sends the pos to...

but I have read so many similar stories.

🎻
 
A half century student visa? All ICE agents are doing is cleaning up the mess left by other administrations. If she isn't a member of an Iranian sleeper cell she will probably be released even though she is technically illegally in the U.S.

Wrong.
She originally came here with a student visa, but then applied for political asylum, marriage sponsor, and anchor baby as well.

She is not "technically illegal" since all of those 3 conditions are easily proven true, and any one of them should be legally sufficient.
 
She followed all the rules, and has more right to be here than the Vietnamese boat people.
Nah. You have no proof.

If there is a Vietnamese that is working against America and living in America and not legal?

Out damned spot.

Yet there it isn't. - to misquote the bard. :deal:
 
How many people are vax damaged?

You assholes who demanded everyone get vaxxed do not care about them,

When you ADMIT you were wrong about the vax and you cry over each and every vax damaged person….I will cry over this woman.

That is a 2 way street. Too bad for her, BUT FOR THE GREATER GOOD, SHE HAS TO GO. JUST LIKE THE VAX,

That makes no sense.
The covid vax turned out to be bad, but it was not criminal for people to assume the vax would have been good like all previous vaxes were.
And the point is this woman harmed no one, so it is illegal to harm her by deporting her.
She met the requirements for citizenship and was illegally denied.
 
I agree that it appears to be ridiculous, but I have read so many similar stories of people being illegally deported even though they have US citizen spouses or children, that it likely is a true story.
I added to that post after you posted. There is more.
 
Nah. You have no proof.

If there is a Vietnamese that is working against America and living in America and not legal?

Out damned spot.

Yet there it isn't. - to misquote the bard. :deal:

No Vietnamese are getting deported even if they commit crimes.
This Iranian woman committed no crimes.
She is NOT "working against America".
She followed all the rules, so should be legal.
 
No Vietnamese are getting deported even if they commit crimes.
This Iranian woman committed no crimes.
She is NOT "working against America".
She followed all the rules, so should be legal.
Her first marriage was for convenience which immigration declared not worthy for immigration reasons.
 
No Vietnamese are getting deported even if they commit crimes.
Liar.

Specific Cases:

Examples include Tuan Phan, a Vietnamese refugee deported to South Sudan in 2025 despite expecting deportation to Vietnam, highlighting controversial third-country deportations.


c6c4a47b5456c60c5294f7928c60d9ff.webp



Another case involved a Vietnamese man in Los Angeles nearly deported to Libya in 2025. These cases show ICE targeting both illegal aliens and legal residents with revoked status due to crimes.
 
I added to that post after you posted. There is more.

Ok, so I think this is what you added:
{...
Also, what was this 'past marriage' of her that was fraudulent? The article does not say.

I don't buy her story. It's ultimately ridiculous. The Guardian story is a bunch of B.S.

Also:

"Milne was divorced from the nonimmigrant student she married prior to 1983. She then married a U.S. citizen but we found, in our above-said unpublished opinion, that she had admitted that it was a marriage of convenience. After another divorce, she married her current husband, a marriage that is uncontested as "bona fide." Her request for legal permanent resident status based on this marriage was denied under INA § 204(c) which precludes approval based on even an admittedly good-faith union if the petitioner had previously contracted an improper marriage."
...}

But even if her first marriage was just to become a citizen, that should not alter the second marriage that produced a US citizen child.
Clearly "INA § 204(c)" is not legal.
A previous bogus marriage does not alter the fact government does not have the authority to break up families by deporting a mother from their valid husband and child.
Laws are only valid when necessary to protect others, and this protects no one, but harms all 3 people.
 
If every one of you lefties sponsored one illegal, THEY COULD ALL STAY.

You could do it. Get to it.

You will not because you are NIMBY frauds and this is a political football.

Do the math. If each of you lefties sponsored an illegal, THEY COULD ALL STAY.
 

Get to work
 
If I was living in your basement for 47 years without you noticing, I should be allowed to stay!

🤡
 
Liar.

Specific Cases:

Examples include Tuan Phan, a Vietnamese refugee deported to South Sudan in 2025 despite expecting deportation to Vietnam, highlighting controversial third-country deportations.


View attachment 1129813


Another case involved a Vietnamese man in Los Angeles nearly deported to Libya in 2025. These cases show ICE targeting both illegal aliens and legal residents with revoked status due to crimes.

How is ICE now even illegally deporting Vietnamese, supposed to be any sort of excuse for deporting the Iranian woman?
The only difference is the Vietnamese boat people started arriving here in the US, about 3 years before the Iranian refugees.
The point is the US committed illegal acts that cause these people to become refugees who could no longer stay in their home country.
So the US should be honoring our commitment to them.

I brought up the Vietnamese to show why we should be accepting these refugees of our creation.
The fact ICE is now also deporting Vietnamese, only increases the criminality of ICE.
 
15th post
How is ICE now even illegally deporting Vietnamese, supposed to be any sort of excuse for deporting the Iranian woman?
The only difference is the Vietnamese boat people started arriving here in the US, about 3 years before the Iranian refugees.
The point is the US committed illegal acts that cause these people to become refugees who could no longer stay in their home country.
So the US should be honoring our commitment to them.

I brought up the Vietnamese to show why we should be accepting these refugees of our creation.
The fact ICE is now also deporting Vietnamese, only increases the criminality of ICE.
You really are a moron of the 'nth degree.

You're dumber than beale.
 
Ok, so I think this is what you added:
{...
Also, what was this 'past marriage' of her that was fraudulent? The article does not say.

I don't buy her story. It's ultimately ridiculous. The Guardian story is a bunch of B.S.

Also:

"Milne was divorced from the nonimmigrant student she married prior to 1983. She then married a U.S. citizen but we found, in our above-said unpublished opinion, that she had admitted that it was a marriage of convenience. After another divorce, she married her current husband, a marriage that is uncontested as "bona fide." Her request for legal permanent resident status based on this marriage was denied under INA § 204(c) which precludes approval based on even an admittedly good-faith union if the petitioner had previously contracted an improper marriage."
...}

But even if her first marriage was just to become a citizen, that should not alter the second marriage that produced a US citizen child.
Clearly "INA § 204(c)" is not legal.
A previous bogus marriage does not alter the fact government does not have the authority to break up families by deporting a mother from their valid husband and child.
Laws are only valid when necessary to protect others, and this protects no one, but harms all 3 people.
Apparently a marriage of convenience DOES impact an alien's attempt to become legal. It says that:

"this marriage was denied under INA § 204(c) which precludes approval based on even an admittedly good-faith union if the petitioner had previously contracted an improper marriage."
 
If I was living in your basement for 47 years without you noticing, I should be allowed to stay!

🤡

Wrong.
It is the fact she fits all the criteria.
She was forced to leave Iran due to the US angering Iran with the Shah, so meets the political asylum criteria.
She married a US citizen so meets the marriage criteria.
She had an anchor baby in the US, so meets that criteria.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom