Common Sense & Mass Murder

[progressive hunter]

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED ,has no room for ambiguity,,,


you should just get out if you dont like this country,,,

"Shall not be infringed" doesn't exist in a vacuum. There's a qualifying clause that leaves plenty of ambiguity, particularly as there was no standing army, and the militiae of the day were instruments of the State. Modern activist judges chose to ignore the militia clause.

and yet you fail to post this clause,,,

Are you unaware of it?

enlighten me,,,

As soon as you tell me you're unaware of it.

figures,,,I knew one didnt exist,,,

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I'd never move to another country, even when people like you live here. You're just a temporary pimple on one's butt, and thus not relevant in the total life experience living in the United States.

"All that is required for evil men to prevail......."

The evil men ARE prevailing. Eventually, denying will no longer work. When the Day of reckoning arrives, the price will be enormous and insufferable.

 

[S.J.]

Most violent crime takes place in Democrat controlled cities. Perhaps we should be looking at Dem control instead of Gun control.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED ,has no room for ambiguity,,,

you should just get out if you dont like this country,,,

It seems you are out of touch with reality, since the shall not infringe includes more weapons than guns. Restrictions apply to deny or require a license to own an automatic firearm, fragmentation grenades, Surface to Air Missiles, these and other weapons of war are infringed by laws and regulations. Push button and gravity knives, and nunchocks are illegal in many states and communities too. A gun is just one of many "arms" and many of these arms are restricted or outlawed.

I'd never move to another country, even when people like you live here. You're just a temporary pimple on one's butt, and thus not relevant in the total life experience living in the United States.

It would appear we're quite permanent. Th

Gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. I see no need to reevaluate the second amendment.

Here's another 2nd Amendment Celebration now!

Walmart shooting: 2 people are dead and an officer is is wounded in Mississippi - CNN

We live in a country of over 330 million people. Bad shit is going to happen. It remains a fact that gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. The left's crusade against firearms is emotional hogwash.

400,000,000 guns/125,000,000+ gun owners vs 11,000 gun homicides = not even a blip.

Media magnify local events into national crises to jack up ratings. There is no national crisis.

Tell this ^^^ to the victims who survived Las Vegas and now Gilroy, the famllies of those killed by monsters whose right to own a gun murdered scores of innocent people in classrooms, at concerts, at food fairs, eating at McDonalds or attending church.

Puh-leeeezzz ...

 

[martybegan]

Gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. I see no need to reevaluate the second amendment.

I do. But I have both common sense and empathy.

you also have the elitst belief that as former law enforcement YOU will be able to keep your guns while WE will have to give them up.

You first, ****-waddle.

 

[joaquinmiller]

"Shall not be infringed" doesn't exist in a vacuum. There's a qualifying clause that leaves plenty of ambiguity, particularly as there was no standing army, and the militiae of the day were instruments of the State. Modern activist judges chose to ignore the militia clause.

and yet you fail to post this clause,,,

Are you unaware of it?

enlighten me,,,

As soon as you tell me you're unaware of it.

figures,,,I knew one didnt exist,,,

Look up the 2nd Amendment, then holler back.

 

[miketx]

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

I hope they catch the gun who did it, you sick lying idiot.

 

[miketx]

Gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. I see no need to reevaluate the second amendment.

Here's another 2nd Amendment Celebration now!

Walmart shooting: 2 people are dead and an officer is is wounded in Mississippi - CNN

Sick freaks celebrating murder. Liberals are all garbage.

 

[progressive hunter]

and yet you fail to post this clause,,,

Are you unaware of it?

enlighten me,,,

As soon as you tell me you're unaware of it.

figures,,,I knew one didnt exist,,,

Look up the 2nd Amendment, then holler back.

I have it right here,,,and it says nothing ON THIS TOPIC other than
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

 

[joaquinmiller]

Are you unaware of it?

enlighten me,,,

As soon as you tell me you're unaware of it.

figures,,,I knew one didnt exist,,,

Look up the 2nd Amendment, then holler back.

I have it right here,,,and it says nothing ON THIS TOPIC other than
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Nothing about a well-regulated militia? You must have a special copy.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

And what will you, in your apparent infinite wisdom, suggest "we" do to prevent gangs, narco-terrorists, jihadists and the legions of average street thugs from obtaining weapons by the shipment, illegally? Will you reply, upon discovery of certain thefts of military hardware finding its way on sale on the streets claim "that's a problem for the military to solve?" Or what about crates of guns purchased by Central and South American rebel forces decades ago mysteriously used in murders on the streets of our cities? Congratulations, you've identified the pin pricking American Society, while wholly ignoring the entire sword point. Of course, that's how accumulation of political currency in service of ideology always works.

I don't claim to have "infinite wisdom", though common sense on the issue of gun violence & gun regulations makes it seem I have wisdom.

Hate and fear are emotions, and they seem to be the emotions which rattled your cage to post your fears in this post.

 

[progressive hunter]

enlighten me,,,

As soon as you tell me you're unaware of it.

figures,,,I knew one didnt exist,,,

Look up the 2nd Amendment, then holler back.

I have it right here,,,and it says nothing ON THIS TOPIC other than
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Nothing about a well-regulated militia? You must have a special copy.

thats a different subject and a qualifier for why shall not be infringed was needed,,,

and it says nothing about regs or restrictions

 

[progressive hunter]

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

And what will you, in your apparent infinite wisdom, suggest "we" do to prevent gangs, narco-terrorists, jihadists and the legions of average street thugs from obtaining weapons by the shipment, illegally? Will you reply, upon discovery of certain thefts of military hardware finding its way on sale on the streets claim "that's a problem for the military to solve?" Or what about crates of guns purchased by Central and South American rebel forces decades ago mysteriously used in murders on the streets of our cities? Congratulations, you've identified the pin pricking American Society, while wholly ignoring the entire sword point. Of course, that's how accumulation of political currency in service of ideology always works.

I don't claim to have "infinite wisdom", though common sense on the issue of gun violence & gun regulations makes it seem I have wisdom.

Hate and fear are emotions, and they seem to be the emotions which rattled your cage to post your fears in this post.

not when you consider the fact that guns save more lives than they take,,,


its time you
GET THE **** OUT!!!

 

[captkaos]

Gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. I see no need to reevaluate the second amendment.

Here's another 2nd Amendment Celebration now!

Walmart shooting: 2 people are dead and an officer is is wounded in Mississippi - CNN

We live in a country of over 330 million people. Bad shit is going to happen. It remains a fact that gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. The left's crusade against firearms is emotional hogwash.

400,000,000 guns/125,000,000+ gun owners vs 11,000 gun homicides = not even a blip.

Media magnify local events into national crises to jack up ratings. There is no national crisis.

60 shootings in a weekend in Detroit a while back. Never heard a word about who was doing all the shooting. Probably a bunch of psycho white guys! in a city with a 60% black population. Probably not ! And who were the victims ? I'm guessing not white folks correct me if I'm wrong!

 

[Wry Catcher]

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED ,has no room for ambiguity,,,

you should just get out if you dont like this country,,,

It seems you are out of touch with reality, since the shall not infringe includes more weapons than guns. Restrictions apply to deny or require a license to own an automatic firearm, fragmentation grenades, Surface to Air Missiles, these and other weapons of war are infringed by laws and regulations. Push button and gravity knives, and nunchocks are illegal in many states and communities too. A gun is just one of many "arms" and many of these arms are restricted or outlawed.

I'd never move to another country, even when people like you live here. You're just a temporary pimple on one's butt, and thus not relevant in the total life experience living in the United States.

those are infringments and those that imposed them should be shot for treason

Wow, is that a threat? Simply making that post should put you in sights of Law Enforcement.

 

[Wry Catcher]

You realize of course that the communities that have some of the strictest gun laws have the most fun violence. Also the places with the less strict laws are safer. You know that right?

No.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life.

Spoken like a true fascist Commie

"Murdered By a GUN"

I'm an educated Democrat, socially liberal, fiscally responsible, not a fascist, not a "Commie" and in touch with reality, something you keep proving you are not.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. I see no need to reevaluate the second amendment.

Here's another 2nd Amendment Celebration now!

Walmart shooting: 2 people are dead and an officer is is wounded in Mississippi - CNN

We live in a country of over 330 million people. Bad shit is going to happen. It remains a fact that gun crime has been dropping since the 80s. The left's crusade against firearms is emotional hogwash.

400,000,000 guns/125,000,000+ gun owners vs 11,000 gun homicides = not even a blip.

Media magnify local events into national crises to jack up ratings. There is no national crisis.

60 shootings in a weekend in Detroit a while back. Never heard a word about who was doing all the shooting. Probably a bunch of psycho white guys! in a city with a 60% black population. Probably not ! And who were the victims ? I'm guessing not white folks correct me if I'm wrong!

They're you stats, you need to prove them. BTW, it matters not, you post is both off topic and clearly brands you as a racist.

 

[joaquinmiller]

As soon as you tell me you're unaware of it.

figures,,,I knew one didnt exist,,,

Look up the 2nd Amendment, then holler back.

I have it right here,,,and it says nothing ON THIS TOPIC other than
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Nothing about a well-regulated militia? You must have a special copy.

thats a different subject and a qualifier for why shall not be infringed was needed,,,

and it says nothing about regs or restrictions

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

It's part of the same sentence and you claim it's a different subject? Do you think it's there because there wasn't room elsewhere?

 

[progressive hunter]

figures,,,I knew one didnt exist,,,

Look up the 2nd Amendment, then holler back.

I have it right here,,,and it says nothing ON THIS TOPIC other than
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Nothing about a well-regulated militia? You must have a special copy.

thats a different subject and a qualifier for why shall not be infringed was needed,,,

and it says nothing about regs or restrictions

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

It's part of the same sentence and you claim it's a different subject? Do you think it's there because there wasn't room elsewhere?

we were talking about the right to bare arms not why a militia was necessary,,,

please try and keep up,,,

you said there was a clause that allowed for regs and restrictions,,,so where is it???