Johns Hopkins: More gun control needed to prevent second civil war

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2021
41,172
57,947
3,488
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia

A recent report by the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, which is part of Johns Hopkins (Michael) Bloomberg School of Public Health, conflates private gun ownership with armed insurrection in order to advocate for expanded gun control.

The 32-page study, which is titled “Defending Democracy: Addressing the Danger of Armed Insurrection,” not only revisits and revises the Jan. 6th protest – even though no protesters were armed and the only casualty was 35-year-old Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed by Capitol Police – it resurrects actual armed insurrections from American history, such as Shays’ Rebellion of 1786, the Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 and the American Civil War.

The three authors, who are all attorneys with a history of paid anti-gun activism, clumsily raise the insurrection boogeyman to push for additional regulations for carrying firearms, tactical training prohibitions, additional gun-free zones, expanded Red Flag laws and the repeal of state preemption statutes, which has long been a major goal of the gun ban industry. Preemption laws prevent local jurisdictions from enacting their own gun-control regulations, which would result in a patchwork of gun-free zones.

The medical community and everyone in it needs to shut the fuck up on guns, politics, and law.

Study your damn medical shit and be ready to serve people in health care only.

It’s only a “second civil war” if the government wins again. Otherwise it would be the second revolutionary war. ;)
 
He understand what he needs to do. Rescind the 2nd. Good luck with that.
I didn't read the link but if the title is accurate...then he doesn't understand that "gun control" is unconstitutional while procedurally rescinding the 2nd amendment is not...and perhaps while they're looking into revising the constitution they could pare down parts of the first amendment that seem to some, to allow the media to incite unconstitutional/violent behavior.
 
I didn't read the link but if the title is accurate...then he doesn't understand that "gun control" is unconstitutional while procedurally rescinding the 2nd amendment is not...and perhaps while they're looking into revising the constitution they could pare down parts of the first amendment that seem to some, to allow the media to incite unconstitutional/violent behavior.
The SAF is very grounded in the law and they are where the rubber meets the road as far as the legal end of our 2A rights fight.....When they put out something (rare) it's always worth reading.
 
A recent report by the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, which is part of Johns Hopkins (Michael) Bloomberg School of Public Health, conflates private gun ownership with armed insurrection in order to advocate for expanded gun control.
And thus, further demonstrating the validity of, and the necessity for, the 2nd Amendment.
 

A recent report by the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, which is part of Johns Hopkins (Michael) Bloomberg School of Public Health, conflates private gun ownership with armed insurrection in order to advocate for expanded gun control.

The 32-page study, which is titled “Defending Democracy: Addressing the Danger of Armed Insurrection,” not only revisits and revises the Jan. 6th protest – even though no protesters were armed and the only casualty was 35-year-old Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed by Capitol Police – it resurrects actual armed insurrections from American history, such as Shays’ Rebellion of 1786, the Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 and the American Civil War.

The three authors, who are all attorneys with a history of paid anti-gun activism, clumsily raise the insurrection boogeyman to push for additional regulations for carrying firearms, tactical training prohibitions, additional gun-free zones, expanded Red Flag laws and the repeal of state preemption statutes, which has long been a major goal of the gun ban industry. Preemption laws prevent local jurisdictions from enacting their own gun-control regulations, which would result in a patchwork of gun-free zones.

The medical community and everyone in it needs to shut the fuck up on guns, politics, and law.

Study your damn medical shit and be ready to serve people in health care only.

It’s only a “second civil war” if the government wins again. Otherwise it would be the second revolutionary war. ;)

And hitler disarmed the Jews in Germany to keep them from causing trouble too.......then he murdered 6 million of them....
 
He understand what he needs to do. Rescind the 2nd. Good luck with that.
In other words, be quiet and don’t talk against gun violence. Just fix the injured and shut your mouth.
Gunaholic fools really don’t get it. There is what they call, liability. At some point, any armed insurrectionist just won’t be give health and liability insurance dufus. The private sector and capitalism like it has stated already, will simple price them out of coverage. Try to keep a job of any worth having while carrying a gun around while serving customers…..
 
In other words, be quiet and don’t talk against gun violence. Just fix the injured and shut your mouth.
Gunaholic fools really don’t get it. There is what they call, liability. At some point, any armed insurrectionist just won’t be give health and liability insurance dufus. The private sector and capitalism like it has stated already, will simple price them out of coverage. Try to keep a job of any worth having while carrying a gun around while serving customers…..


No, you don't get it.

We don't have a gun problem...we have a political party, the democrat party, that refuses to keep the most violent and dangerous criminals locked up. They keep releasing them over and over again...

The two gang bangers in Kansas City? You will find out they have long histories of crime and violence and should not have been roaming free that day....but they were released by democrat party prosectuors and judges in the democrat party city of KC........

Moron......we have over 22 million Americans carrying guns legally for self defense......and they are not the ones shooting anyone, and they carry their guns with them even at their jobs when they can.....

You are an idiot and a fool.....

the governments of Europe did exactly what you asshats want to do...they registered and then banned and confiscated guns over a 19 year period...then, over 6 years, the governments of Europe murdered 20 million innocent men, women and children...

Not war dead.....innocent victims rounded up, marched into forests and camps and murdered....

After giving up their guns.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., over our entire 247 year history...gun murder? Around 2,470,000....and the vast majority of those murdered are criminals murdered by other criminals...

Gun control Europe.......

6 years, 20 million murdered

Gun murder in the U.S. over 247 years......

2,470,000.....

Can you tell us which murder number is bigger.....

Can you tell us how many hundreds of years it will take us to catch up to Europe?

You dumb ass....

On Top of that, Americans use their legal guns 1.1 million times a year, on average, to stop rapes, robberies, murders, beatings and stabbings.......according to the Centers for Disease Control.....lives saved that you would allow to end...

You are an idiot.
 

A recent report by the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, which is part of Johns Hopkins (Michael) Bloomberg School of Public Health, conflates private gun ownership with armed insurrection in order to advocate for expanded gun control.

The 32-page study, which is titled “Defending Democracy: Addressing the Danger of Armed Insurrection,” not only revisits and revises the Jan. 6th protest – even though no protesters were armed and the only casualty was 35-year-old Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed by Capitol Police – it resurrects actual armed insurrections from American history, such as Shays’ Rebellion of 1786, the Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 and the American Civil War.

The three authors, who are all attorneys with a history of paid anti-gun activism, clumsily raise the insurrection boogeyman to push for additional regulations for carrying firearms, tactical training prohibitions, additional gun-free zones, expanded Red Flag laws and the repeal of state preemption statutes, which has long been a major goal of the gun ban industry. Preemption laws prevent local jurisdictions from enacting their own gun-control regulations, which would result in a patchwork of gun-free zones.

The medical community and everyone in it needs to shut the fuck up on guns, politics, and law.

Study your damn medical shit and be ready to serve people in health care only.

It’s only a “second civil war” if the government wins again. Otherwise it would be the second revolutionary war. ;)
In a government of the People, by the People, and for the People... Why would a government that faithfully serves the will of said People, fear Civil War? That doesn't make much sense...
 

Forum List

Back
Top