mamooth
Diamond Member
I was being sarcastic...
No, you weren't. You were just making crazy stuff up. To qualify as sarcasm, something has to be close to reality. Fantasies are not sarcasm.
You are in the climate kook club supporting bizarre far into the future climate modeling scenarios,
See? Nobody ever said a climate model could predict daily weather. You just made that up. Your story is isn't attached to reality. Did you make up such a dumb story because you were clueless, or was it deliberate dishonesty?
They are the following, untestable, unverifiable and pseudoscience junk
No, that's denialism, and it's trivially easy to prove.
Name some realistic hard data that could falsify your denier beliefs. Do it right here.
<crickets>
I've asked this question many times. No denier ever answers. They can't, because there is literally no data that could falsify their beliefs. That places their beliefs firmly in the category of pseudoscience or religion.
You are a confirmed hater of The Scientific Method paradigm.
In stark contrast to you goofy cult religious beliefs, AGW theory is falsifiable in many ways, putting it in the category of hard science. I suspect that's why you hate it so much. You type hates the age of reason, and seeks to drag us back to the dark ages.