$3 trillion per year to 2050 to reduce CO2 from the historic 7,000 PPM according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen

[EMH]

Bah Ha HA HA HA HA HA

Nice climate toddler.

Why can't you answer any basic climate questions?

Let's try the first one.

Why does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9+ times the ice of the other, the Arctic?

start the Jeopardy! music

 

[EMH]

What was the subject of your doctoral dissertation?

Just BS not PhD.

 

[otto105]

Why can't you answer any basic climate questions?

Let's try the first one.

Why does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9+ times the ice of the other, the Arctic?

start the Jeopardy! music

The basic question of the correlation of CO2 and temperature has been answered a century ago.

Climate toddler.

 

[EMH]

The basic question of the correlation of CO2 and temperature has been answered a century ago.

Climate toddler.

Once again, we have a science invalid who can parrot, but cannot answer the most basic climate questions....

If they cannot explain why one polar circle has more than 9 times the ice of the other, why should we believe anything they say about climate change?

 

[otto105]

Once again, we have a science invalid who can parrot, but cannot answer the most basic climate questions....

If they cannot explain why one polar circle has more than 9 times the ice of the other, why should we believe anything they say about climate change?

Hilarious climate toddler

Explain CO2 and temperature so we can laugh at your answer.

 

[EMH]

Hilarious climate toddler

Explain CO2 and temperature so we can laugh at your answer.

Thanks, and gladly.

Your THEORY is that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere.

We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temperatures, satellites and balloons. For decades, both of those showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2 in highly correlated fashion.

Hence, in the most basic part of science, you have a theory, the data refuted the theory so

THEORY REJECTED

but that's not how the Co2 FRAUD bilks America. It fudges data and lies, and gets completely sick and treasonous morons like you to cheer it...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling



and hence the correlation between Co2 and atmospheric temperature is

ABSOLUTE FUCKING ZERO like your integrity, patriotism, and science intellect

 

[Crick]

Thanks, and gladly.

Your THEORY is that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere.

We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temperatures, satellites and balloons. For decades, both of those showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2 in highly correlated fashion.

Hence, in the most basic part of science, you have a theory, the data refuted the theory so

THEORY REJECTED

but that's not how the Co2 FRAUD bilks America. It fudges data and lies, and gets completely sick and treasonous morons like you to cheer it...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling



and hence the correlation between Co2 and atmospheric temperature is

ABSOLUTE FUCKING ZERO like your integrity, patriotism, and science intellect

Have you ever seen a thermometer?

 

[EMH]

When beaten in debate, crock resorts to trolling/drive byes....

 

[Crick]

When beaten in debate, crock resorts to trolling/drive byes....

When beaten in debate, crock resorts to trolling/drive byes....

So, was that a yes or no about the thermometer? Some are circular dials and some are straight glass tubes. If you haven't I'm pretty sure we can find you a picture (a PHOTO - scientific PROOF) of one.

 

[otto105]

Thanks, and gladly.

Your THEORY is that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere.

We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temperatures, satellites and balloons. For decades, both of those showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2 in highly correlated fashion.

Hence, in the most basic part of science, you have a theory, the data refuted the theory so

THEORY REJECTED

but that's not how the Co2 FRAUD bilks America. It fudges data and lies, and gets completely sick and treasonous morons like you to cheer it...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling



and hence the correlation between Co2 and atmospheric temperature is

ABSOLUTE FUCKING ZERO like your integrity, patriotism, and science intellect

Bah Ha Ha Ha Ha Hs

Right on cue climate toddler. Pulls an article from 2005 which doesn’t even support his point.

What time do you start kindergarten?

 

[EMH]

Bah Ha Ha Ha Ha Hs

Right on cue climate toddler. Pulls an article from 2005 which doesn’t even support his point.

What time do you start kindergarten?

The article documents the following truth

We have 2 and only 2 measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons
Both showed NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE for decades before being FUDGED in 2005
There is NO EVIDENCE OTHER THAN FUDGE that Co2 warms anything

 

[otto105]

The article documents the following truth

We have 2 and only 2 measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons
Both showed NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE for decades before being FUDGED in 2005
There is NO EVIDENCE OTHER THAN FUDGE that Co2 warms anything

I would suggest everybody read the article presented by the climate toddler

 

[Dagosa]

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Saturday that the global transition to a low-carbon economy requires $3 trillion in new capital each year through 2050, far above current annual financing, but that filling the gap is the biggest economic opportunity of the 21st century

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/yellen-says-3-trillion-needed-annually-climate-financing-far-more-than-current-2024-07-27/

NEW PEER REVIEWED STUDY: CO2 HAS ZERO IMPACT ON CLIMATE CHANGE

New Peer Reviewed Study: CO2 has Zero Impact on Climate Change - The HighWire

New study shows CO2 has minimal effect on temperatures, questions climate crisis claims, and warns against hasty energy transitions.

thehighwire.com

Once again... those of you that continue to believe that the BIASED MSM is your source...
read the above link and if you have an 8.5 seconds attention span here is a summary!
Squirrel! Why attention spans seem to be shrinking and what we can do about it

A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have zero impact on the Earth’s global temperatures.
The study concludes that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for our planet due to an increase in CO2, there is serious doubt that this is, in fact, the case.

Instead, the study authors deduced that their research unequivocally means that the officially presented narrative that human activity is causing a detrimental CO2 increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a substantiated reality.
The study also confirms what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which is that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of policymakers” regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an agenda that has nothing to do with climate change. She insists that “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what human beings are doing.”
According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do really stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before we have something better to replace it with.” She believes the biggest climate risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the risk of rapidly getting rid of fossil fuels

New Peer Reviewed Study: CO2 has Zero Impact on Climate Change - The HighWire

New study shows CO2 has minimal effect on temperatures, questions climate crisis claims, and warns against hasty energy transitions.

thehighwire.com

Finally those of you that believe that a 1.5° C increase will destroy our world and it is caused by increasing CO2 parts per million PPM of 422.04 ppm daily average reading for atmospheric CO2 on the planet.
So what caused this?
"Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "

How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters

Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.

e360.yale.edu

That alone should cover the FEMA bill to repair Texas and Florida from the ravages of climate change. Two of the biggest denier states who suck of the tit of federal disaster aid.

 

[healthmyths]

That alone should cover the FEMA bill to repair Texas and Florida from the ravages of climate change. Two of the biggest denier states who suck of the tit of federal disaster aid.

YOU obviously didn't read closely...U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Saturday that the global transition to a low-carbon economy requires $3 trillion in new capital each year through 2050,
A) Had nothing to do with Texas and Florida
B) Had nothing to do with "ravages"!
Totally to convert from fossil fuels to solar, nuclear and wind. All of which will require trillions of money to build!
How stupid.
Again... please tell me where 4,000 ppm of CO2 that was in the atmosphere 500 million years ago existed?
Also tell me what harm 7,000 PPMs did to the environment?
You have no idea what I'm describing do you?
FACTS!!
why are we so worried about 422 ppm CO2 when 1/2 billion years ago the world was living successfully at 7,000 PPM!
Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "

How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters

Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.

e360.yale.edu

 

[otto105]

YOU obviously didn't read closely...U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Saturday that the global transition to a low-carbon economy requires $3 trillion in new capital each year through 2050,
A) Had nothing to do with Texas and Florida
B) Had nothing to do with "ravages"!
Totally to convert from fossil fuels to solar, nuclear and wind. All of which will require trillions of money to build!
How stupid.
Again... please tell me where 4,000 ppm of CO2 that was in the atmosphere 500 million years ago existed?
Also tell me what harm 7,000 PPMs did to the environment?
You have no idea what I'm describing do you?
FACTS!!
why are we so worried about 422 ppm CO2 when 1/2 billion years ago the world was living successfully at 7,000 PPM!
Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "

How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters

Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.

e360.yale.edu

Can you post the atmospheric composition from 500 million years ago and how our ancestors dealt with it.

Or not

 

[Crick]

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Saturday that the global transition to a low-carbon economy requires $3 trillion in new capital each year through 2050, far above current annual financing, but that filling the gap is the biggest economic opportunity of the 21st century

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/yellen-says-3-trillion-needed-annually-climate-financing-far-more-than-current-2024-07-27/

NEW PEER REVIEWED STUDY: CO2 HAS ZERO IMPACT ON CLIMATE CHANGE

New Peer Reviewed Study: CO2 has Zero Impact on Climate Change - The HighWire

New study shows CO2 has minimal effect on temperatures, questions climate crisis claims, and warns against hasty energy transitions.

thehighwire.com

Once again... those of you that continue to believe that the BIASED MSM is your source...
read the above link and if you have an 8.5 seconds attention span here is a summary!
Squirrel! Why attention spans seem to be shrinking and what we can do about it

A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have zero impact on the Earth’s global temperatures.
The study concludes that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for our planet due to an increase in CO2, there is serious doubt that this is, in fact, the case.

Instead, the study authors deduced that their research unequivocally means that the officially presented narrative that human activity is causing a detrimental CO2 increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a substantiated reality.
The study also confirms what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which is that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of policymakers” regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an agenda that has nothing to do with climate change. She insists that “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what human beings are doing.”
According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do really stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before we have something better to replace it with.” She believes the biggest climate risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the risk of rapidly getting rid of fossil fuels

New Peer Reviewed Study: CO2 has Zero Impact on Climate Change - The HighWire

New study shows CO2 has minimal effect on temperatures, questions climate crisis claims, and warns against hasty energy transitions.

thehighwire.com

Finally those of you that believe that a 1.5° C increase will destroy our world and it is caused by increasing CO2 parts per million PPM of 422.04 ppm daily average reading for atmospheric CO2 on the planet.
So what caused this?
"Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "

How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters

Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.

e360.yale.edu

You claim this study was peer reviewed. Who reviewed it?

 

[Dagosa]

YOU obviously didn't read closely...U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Saturday that the global transition to a low-carbon economy requires $3 trillion in new capital each year through 2050,
A) Had nothing to do with Texas and Florida
B) Had nothing to do with "ravages"!
Totally to convert from fossil fuels to solar, nuclear and wind. All of which will require trillions of money to build!
How stupid.
Again... please tell me where 4,000 ppm of CO2 that was in the atmosphere 500 million years ago existed?
Also tell me what harm 7,000 PPMs did to the environment?
You have no idea what I'm describing do you?
FACTS!!
why are we so worried about 422 ppm CO2 when 1/2 billion years ago the world was living successfully at 7,000 PPM!
Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "

How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters

Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.

e360.yale.edu

Total babble…..that’s GLOBAL investment, not the United States. Go read something that isn’t from the head parrots, Fix News

Florida, Louisiana and Texas residents have received the lion's share of FEMA direct assistance since 2015, per newly gathered data. Why it matters:

 

[healthmyths]

Florida, Louisiana and Texas residents have received the lion's share of FEMA direct assistance since 2015,

AGAIN has nothing to do with"Direct Assistance"!

Yellen says $3T of fresh capital is needed annually to fight climate change​

The Treasury secretary called the shift to a low-carbon global economy
“the single greatest opportunity of the 21st century.”
Yellen added that the Treasury Department is playing a key role in supporting the transition to net zero in the U.S., a priority of the Biden administration. She credited the Inflation Reduction Act for driving hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in clean energy technologies.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/27/yellen-amazon-climate-change-00171522

WHERE does she address FEMA??? Where does she address Texas, Florida and Louisiana? NO WHERE!!
GEEZ what the hell are you writing about?

 

[healthmyths]

Can you post the atmospheric composition from 500 million years ago and how our ancestors dealt with it.

Or not

Around 500 million years ago, the Earth's atmosphere was primarily composed of a high concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2), with significantly less oxygen than today,
considered a "reducing" atmosphere;meaning it lacked free oxygen and likely contained other gases like methane and water vapor, with the exact composition still being studied by scientists due to the limitations of fossil evidence.

| EarthSky

earthsky.org

 

[Dagosa]

AGAIN has nothing to do with"Direct Assistance"!

Yellen says $3T of fresh capital is needed annually to fight climate change​

The Treasury secretary called the shift to a low-carbon global economy
“the single greatest opportunity of the 21st century.”
Yellen added that the Treasury Department is playing a key role in supporting the transition to net zero in the U.S., a priority of the Biden administration. She credited the Inflation Reduction Act for driving hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in clean energy technologies.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/27/yellen-amazon-climate-change-00171522

WHERE does she address FEMA??? Where does she address Texas, Florida and Louisiana? NO WHERE!!
GEEZ what the hell are you writing about?

You’re not much into math are you ? Read your own post. It’s a GLOBAL investment. The last time anyone looked, the worlds gdp was over 100 trillion in 2022 alone. . So the global investment has to be 3 trillion a year…Think we can afford 3 Trillion so save us from the world wide “ FEMA “ bills ? Bet your arse.
That’s hilarious. This Must be math from Fux News ?